Khairil Akbar
Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Akbar, Khairil; Pasha Karim, Zahlul; Fadlullah, Nyak; Siddiq Armia, Muhammad
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719

Abstract

DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.
Kontestasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menyelesaikan Polemik Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh Karim, Zahlul Pasha; Akbar, Khairil; Makinara, Ihdi Karim
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i2.13876

Abstract

Abstract: This article tries to trace the steps of the House of Representatives which revoked two articles in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Governance, namely Article 57 and Article 60 paragraph (1), (2) and (4), which relate to the Aceh election institution through Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Later, the Constitutional Court's action was annulled by the Constitutional Court because it violated the formal procedure for amending the Aceh Governance Law. The research method was carried out normatively with two problem formulations, why did the House of Representative revoke two articles of the Aceh Governance Law related to election management institutions in Aceh without complying with and even violating the procedures regulated by the Aceh Governance Law as a special law? Why did the Constitutional Court annulled the revocation of the two articles and consider them unconstitutional? The result showed that the revocation of the two articles was carried out by the House of Representative for several reasons, namely removing the dualism of the election supervisory agency in Aceh and tidying up the structure of the election management body in Indonesia to comply with the provisions of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In 1945 and strengthening election administration institutions in the face of simultaneous elections in 2019. Meanwhile, the steps were taken by the Constitutional Court to cancel the revocation of the two articles and judge them as unconstitutional because the House of Representative did not conduct consultations and asked the Aceh People's Representative Council for consideration in the revocation process.Keywords: Aceh Election Commission; Election Supervisory Committee; Aceh Governance Law; Election Law.Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan menelusuri langkah DPR yang mencabut dua pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh (UUPA), yakni Pasal 57 dan Pasal 60 ayat (1), (2) dan (4), yang berhubungan dengan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Belakangan, pencabutan itu dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi karena dinilai inkonstitusional. Metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif dengan dua rumusan masalah, mengapa DPR mencabut dua pasal UUPA terkait lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh tanpa mematuhi tata cara yang telah diatur oleh UUPA sebagai undang-undang khusus? Mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional? Adapun metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, teori, dan historis. Hasilnya diperoleh bahwa pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dilakukan DPR karena beberapa alasan, yakni menghapus dualisme lembaga pengawas pemilu di Aceh dan menertibkan struktur lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia agar sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 22E ayat (5) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sementara langkah Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional dikarenakan DPR tidak melakukan konsultasi dan meminta pertimbangan DPRA dalam proses pencabutan.Kata Kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Lembaga Pemilu Aceh; Undang-undang Pemilu.
Sengkarut Pola Hubungan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus Mutiara Fahmi; Zahlul Pasha; Khairil Akbar
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): April
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2020.10.1.1-31

Abstract

This article seeks to analize the pattern of relations and authority of election agencies in special autonomous regions in Indonesia. The difference in the pattern of relations between election agencies in the special sutonomy region coincided with the implementation of asymmetric decentralization policies in Indonesia. As a result, differences in authority and specificity that is owned by one region with other regions. Whereas the Indonesian constitution based on Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that all regulations relating to the electoral institutions in Indonesia apply nationally. The research method used is normative and empirical. This study found similarities and differences in the pattern of relationships and authority of election agencies in the special sutonomy Region. The similarity is that the election agencies in this Special Autonomous Region has lost certain duties and authorities that affect the pattern of their relationship. The difference lies in the lost duties and authority. In DKI Jakarta, the duties and responsibilities of the election organizers in the Regency/City are only in the context of assisting the Election organizing tasks in the Province. The duties and authority of the election organizers in DIY are reduced in the case of the Governor General Election. While in Aceh, the task of supervision is divided between two organizing agencies, namely the Aceh Panwaslih and the Aceh Province Panwaslih. In the future, this pattern of relations and authority will become a source of conflict and dispute. While in Papua Province, the election organize did not hold general elections due to the implementation of the noken system in some of these areas. Artikel ini berupaya menganalisis pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otonomi khusus di Indonesia. Perbedaan pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otsus muncul bersamaan dengan implementasi kebijakan desentralisasi asimetris di Indonesia. Akibatnya, muncul perbedaan kewenangan dan kekhususan yang dimiliki oleh satu daerah dengan daerah lain. Padahal konstitusi Indonesia berdasarkan Pasal 22E ayat (5) UUD NRI 1945 menyebutkan bahwa segala peraturan yang terkait dengan lembaga pemilihan umum di Indonesia berlaku secara nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif dan empiris. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya kesamaan dan perbedaan pola hubungan dan kewenangan lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus. Kesamaannya adalah, lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus ini sama-sama kehilangan tugas dan kewenangan tertentu yang memengaruhi pola hubungan mereka. Perbedaannya terletak pada tugas dan kewenangan yang hilang. Di DKI Jakarta, tugas dan kewengan penyelenggara Pemilu di Kabupaten/Kota hanya dalam rangka membantu tugas penyelenggara Pemilu di Provinsi. Tugas dan kewenangan penyelenggara Pemilu di DIY diciutkan dalam hal Pemilukada Gubernur. Sedang di Aceh, tugas pengawasan dibagi kepada dua lembaga penyelenggara, yakni Panwaslih Aceh dan Panwaslih Provinsi Aceh. Ke depan, pola hubungan dan kewenangan ini menjadi sumber konflik dan sengketa. Sementara di Provinsi Papua, lembaga penyelenggara pemilu tidak melaksanakan pemilihan umum akibat penerapan sistem noken di beberapa daerah tersebut.
Politik Hukum Pembentukan Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh Khairil Akbar
Lex Renaissance Vol 2 No 2 (2017): JULI 2017
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss2.art11

Abstract

The signing of Memorandum of Understanding in Helsinki between the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Republic of Indonesia (RI) is a sign of peace for the conflict in Aceh. Among the points of agreement is the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (KKR) in Aceh. This study aims to investigate and explain the basis for KKR establishment as well as the concept of Aceh KKR. To answer this, the author uses a juridical-normative approach with the library research method. We find that the formation of KKR in Aceh is based on Article 229 of Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Government. However, based on the a quo Law, Aceh KKR is referred to as part of National KKR, while National KKR has yet to be established until today. In addition, the institutional concept of Aceh KKR is independent and non-structural with the aim of strengthening peace, helping to achieve reconciliation between perpetrators of human rights violations and victims, and recommending comprehensive reparation for victims of human rights violations. Aceh KKR is based on Islam, Acehnese, independence, impartiality, non-discrimination, democratization, justice and equality, as well as legal certainty.Keywords: Commission; truth; reconciliation; Aceh; human rights