Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Islamic Law Studies Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KEABSAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI SENGKETANYA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ANTAR TATA HUKUM INDONESIA Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna
Journal of Islamic Law Studies Vol. 4, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkawinan merupakan suatu hal yang sangat sakral dalam beberapa kebudayaan. Beberapa tahun belakangan isu perkawinan beda agama menjadi isu yang kembali hangat dibicarakan, terutama sejak adanya Permohonan Pengujian Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974 kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Nomor Perkara 68/PUU-XII/2014 yang mana seolah Pasal 2 ayat (1) ini dianggap melarang perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. Pertanyaan yang akan timbul terkait hal tersebut adalah apakah benar perkawinan beda agama merupakan hal yang dilarang di Indonesia? Lalu bagaimana dengan legitimasi praktik perkawinan beda agama yang sudah terjadi? Kompetensi Absolut peradilan manakah yang berwenang mengadili terkait sengketa perkawinan beda agama? Tulisan ini mencoba menganalisis dan menjawab pertanyaan- pertanyaan tersebut dalam konteks hukum perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan praktik peradilan kontemporer di Indonesia.
MENINJAU KEDUDUKAN PELAKU RIDDAH DAN HUKUMAN MATI BAGI PELAKU RIDDAH BERDASARKAN HUKUM ISLAM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM SUDUT PANDANG ISLAM Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna; Raouf, Nadim
Journal of Islamic Law Studies Vol. 4, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Riddah is an act of apostasy in Islamic faith. Some texts of the hadits (sayings of The Prophet PBUH) indicate that the apostate shall be punished with death sentence. Beside, the apostate will also lose some of his/her rights according to Islamic Sharia. But there is also a principle of Freedom of Religion in quranic text as we read in Surah Albaqarah (chapter 2) verse 256 which says: “There is no compulsion in religion”. This also indicates that the Freedom of Religion in Islamic perspective is guaranteed, and cannot be taken. Thus this writing tries to elaborate the two which are the Freedom of Religion principle and Capital Punishment / Jarimah for apostasy from the perspective of Human Right especially from the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” which was declared in Cairo, Egypt in 1990.
MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.
Co-Authors Raouf, Nadim