Musyarri, Fazal Akmal
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

EVALUASI YURIDIS SISTEM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM DAN IUS CONSTITUENDUM PERADILAN KHUSUS PEMILIHAN UMUM Ulya, Nurul Ula; Musyarri, Fazal Akmal
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (423.477 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2508

Abstract

The General Election Judicial System in Indonesia currently runs partially in Indonesia because the institutional structure that plays a role in handling General Election cases consists of elusive anatomy. Some of these institutions include the Constitutional Court, the Election Supervisory Body, the Administrative Court and the District Court which have different portions of authority and lack synergy in their representation. This can lead to miscoordination and overlapping of authority. Therefore, the formation of a Special Election Judicial body is an alternative solution that can be done to maintain the implementation of a democratic General Election up to the stage of case resolution.
REFORMULASI PENGATURAN MENGENAI FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Ulya, Nurul Ula; Musyarri, Fazal Akmal
Arena Hukum Vol 13, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01303.5

Abstract

 ABSTRACTFinancial Technology, one of the disruptive innovations that restructures aspects of the financial industry and influences people's lifestyles, needs to be balanced with the fulfillment of accommodative legal development. Efforts to develop Financial Technology has caused the technical and service problems. These problems can be minimized by the construction of a legal component both in terms of substance which to date has been deemed inadequate, as well as the institutional aspect of authority, namely the OJK which is considered to be incapable in accommodating the legal aspects of Financial Technology. As a normative juridical research using legislation and conceptual approaches, the focus of the author here is to annotate legal buildings that cannot guarantee legal protection in the development of Financial Technology in an ideal manner. What needs to be underlined is that the development of Financial Technology should require Technology Ethics considerations that can affect Indonesia's readiness in facing the Disruptive Era. This is where the idea of Technology Ethics needs to be penetrated in legal convergence to create a more ideal legal order. ABSTRAKFinancial Technology, salah satu inovasi disruptif yang merestrukturisasi aspek industri keuangan dan mempengaruhi gaya hidup masyarakat, perlu diimbangi dengan pemenuhan pembangunan hukum yang akomodatif. Upaya pengembangan Financial Technology menghadapi problematika teknis maupun layanan. Hal tersebut dapat diminimalisasi dengan konstruksi komponen hukum baik dari segi substansi yang belum memadai, maupun segi kelembagaan yang berwenang yaitu OJK yang dianggap belum kapabel dalam mengakomodir aspek hukum Financial Technology. Sebagai penelitian yuridis normatif dan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta konseptual, fokus penulis disini adalah memberi anotasi terhadap bangunan hukum yang belum dapat memberi jaminan perlindungan hukum dalam pengembangan Financial Technology secara ideal. Perlu digarisbawahi bahwa pengembangan Financial Technology seharusnya memerlukan pertimbangan Etika Teknologi yang dapat mempengaruhi kesiapan Indonesia dalam menyongsong Disruptive Era. Disinilah gagasan Etika Teknologi dipenetrasikan dalam konvergensi hukum sehingga diharapkan dapat menciptakan tatanan hukum yang lebih ideal.
Contoh Penerapan Penetapan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (Studi Kasus Imajiner Amalea v. Ritania atas Malachi Gap) Munir, Misbachul; Elsyam, Churun Ain Nabila; Musyarri, Fazal Akmal; Sihotang, Nenny; Afriyanti, Puput Brenda; Siregar, Zipora Nadya A.
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): International Law Theme
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Law of the Sea divides the maritime territorial boundary of a country into several parts, one of which is the Exclusive Economic Zone or which is often referred to as EEZ. The Exclusive Economic Zone is a zone with a maximum distance of 200 miles in which resources can be utilized but cannot be controlled by a country due to purposes such as shipping and aviation navigation which are generally required. However, due to the nature of its free use, it can lead to conflicts between countries because this is like dominoes that have a correlation with one another. In this paper, it will be described in relation to examples of implementing EEZ conflict resolution in imaginary cases or fictional cases of the State of Amalea and the State of Ritania as a simulation of the settlement of the EEZ determination based on the UNCLOS 1982 sea law. This simulation has fictional factual dynamics that are interesting from a legal perspective with a settlement that is conventional namely the consensus of the parties. Referring to the 1982 UNCLOS, the use of marine aspects needs to be considered so as not to disturb other countries.