Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Politik Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Sorik, Sutan
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Review Buku : Menimbang Demokrasi Dua Dekade Reformasi Sorik, Sutan
Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4642.39 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v16i2.836

Abstract

Tulisan ini mengulas buku yang ditulis oleh lima belas orang peneliti di Pusat Penelitian Politik Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (P2P LIPI) dengan editor Syamsuddin Haris, tentang menimbang demokrasi dua dekade reformasi. Ulasan berfokus pada empat hal, yaitu tentang reformasi menuju sistem demokrasi, reformasi sistem perwakilan, pemilu, dan kepartaian, reformasi sektor kemanan, reformasi hubungan pusat-daerah, desentralisasi, dan politik lokal.Kata kunci: Menimbang Demokrasi, Dua Dekade Reformasi
REKONSTRUKSI RELASI ANTAR LEMBAGA LEGISLASI DI INDONESIA Sorik, Sutan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 51, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study discusses the reconstruction of relations between legislative institutions in Indonesia. This study aims to find the ideal relations of the Regional Representative Council(DPD), the House of Representatives (DPR), and the President in the formation of laws in Indonesia, as an effort to produce laws that have efficacy and usefulness. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research. From the analysis found that the authority of the DPD is constitutionally only optional and has no imperative power, which then has implications for the relations between the DPD and the DPR and the President in shaping the law. The DPD in the formation of the law is onlyused as a complementary legislative body. This shows that there are inconsistencies and incoherence with the aim of democratizing legislative institutions, the principles of popular sovereignty, check and and balances, and the bicameral system. The results of this study recommend purification of the relations between DPD, DPR and the President. Revitalizing the position, role, authority and power ofthe DPD to have original power.
PERDEBATAN TEORITIS TERHADAP PERLUASAN RUANG LINGKUP KEUANGAN NEGARA DI INDONESIA Sorik, Sutan; Dwiatmoko, Anang
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 52, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The focus of this research is the expansion of the scope of state finance which currently still presents cross-thinking. The existence of a coherent understanding regarding the application of the financial legal status of a legal entity, whether it is related to state finances, regional finances, state-owned enterprises (BUMN) finances, regional-owned enterprises (BUMD) finances, or private finances is the background why this happens. In the development of the expansion of the scope of state finances, it became even stronger when the Constitutional Court also issued several decisions in response to requests for judicial review, starting from the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 77/PUU-IX/2011, Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 48/PUU-IX/2013, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-IX/2013. The elasticity of state finances with the concept through a narrow area and also a broad spectrum for the status of state finances will depend on how the parties interpret and use the meaning of state finances themselves. The opening of a broad interpretation of state finances is not only a matter of audit authority but also a problem that is increasingly widespread. The type of research used is normative juridical research. The research method is qualitative. The results of the study found that there was no unified opinion regarding state finances, whether based on theory, laws and regulations, or the decision of the Constitutional Court.
Co-Authors Dwiatmoko, Anang