Kholid, Abd.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

METODOLOGI TAFSIR " TRANSFORMATIF-HUMANISTIK " (TELAAH PEMIKIRAN TAFSIR HASSAN HANAFI) Kholid, Abd.
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 8, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (448.027 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v8i2.1374

Abstract

Dengan karakter penafsiran yang realis, tematis, temporal,transformatif dan eksperimental, metodologi tafsir yang ditawarkanH{assan H{anafi menunjukkan bingkai pembaruan pemikirannyasekaligus tampak digiring untuk melegitimasi proyek pembaruannyayang bercorak kiri. Keberpihakan ini menyebabkan H{assan H{anafimenolak pretensi objektivistik sebagaimana yang lazim ditemukan dalampenafsiran al-Qur?a>n modern. Dengan karakter di atas H{assan H{anafiingin menegaskan subjektivitas dan kepentingan (ideologis) yangmenjadi tujuan penafsirannya. Dengan demikian penilaian AminAbdullah bahwa H{assan H{anafi telah menghindarkan diri daripenafsiran yang subjektif dan menjadikan teks sebagai sekedar justifikasidan dalih bagi kepentingan penafsir, perlu dipertimbangkan, sebabkenyataannya H{assan H{anafi terjebak dengan problem-problem sosialyang bernuansa pembebasan, problem-problem yang memang selaludihadapi dalam kehidupannya
Rereading the Indonesian Interpretation of the Qur’an on Awliyā’: The Cases of Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab Kholid, Abd.; Bakar, Abu; Muktafi, Muktafi; Zamzami, Mukhammad
QIJIS Vol 9, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : IAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/qijis.v9i1.7567

Abstract

There are some problems with interpreting the verses contained in the Koran to the understanding of the contemporary Islamic age, especially regarding the issue of non-Muslim leaders. The majority of Muslim scholars argue that their religion prohibits selecting a non-Muslim leader in a normal situation. Meanwhile, few of them allow such leaders in reasonable conditions based on the argument that the prohibition in the Qur’ān and the Sunna is no longer applicable in the present life. Therefore, this paper re-analyzed the meaning of awliyā’ from the interpretation of Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab with Jorge J.E. Gracia’s hermeneutics perspective. The result suggested that the prohibition to appoint a non-Muslim as the leader is applicable only in situations where such a person shows real hostility toward Islam and makes the religion their enemy. It also applies to Muslims that violate the commands of God and His messenger because the main requirements of being a leader are the ability to create justice and foster prosperity.