Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majalah Patologi Indonesia
Sarwanti
Unknown Affiliation
Health Professions Public Health

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran CD44 pada Progresivitas Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Sarwanti; Marini Stephanie; Ria Kodariah
Majalah Patologi Indonesia Vol 29 No 2 (2020): MPI
Publisher : Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Indonesia (IAPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1315.613 KB) | DOI: 10.55816/mpi.v29i2.415

Abstract

Non alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) is part of a group of conditions called Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases(NAFLD) where it is a chronic disease, which defined after elimination other causes of fatty liver, such as excessivealcohol consumption and other causes of chronic liver diseases. NASH is fatty liver disease which characterized byballooning of hepatocyte and lobular inflammation with or without fibrosis. Histopathology diagnose on NASH can bedefined by performing liver biopsy. The purpose of liver biopsy is to define level and degree of the disease. Cluster ofDifferentiation (CD) 44 is a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor which located on the surface of macrophage cells,lymphocytes and endothelial cells. In studies which conducted on mice and humans, showed that CD44 playsimportant role in the progression of NASH. CD44 regulates inflammation of adipose tissue and liver. CD44 ispresumed as a marker which increase macrophage infiltration and other inflammatory cells on liver. This processleads to ultimate increment on insulin resistance and fatty liver. Deficiency was discovered on mice which injectedwith methionine and choline deficiency diet (MCDD). CD44 is associated with preventive method to prevent livercomplication by reducing macrophage or monocyte and as well as neutrophil accumulation in liver which wasevaluated through reducing numbers of inflammatory focus, expression of inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosisfactor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL) -1B and nitric oxide synthesis (iNOS), and pro-inflammatory types of macrophage. Inobese patients, number of CD44 is predicted to be increasing.
Akurasi Diagnostik dan Analisis Gambaran Sitomorfologi Sikatan Bilier dan Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Pankreas Berdasarkan The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System Sarwanti; Marini Stephanie
Majalah Patologi Indonesia Vol 31 No 2 (2022): MPI
Publisher : Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Indonesia (IAPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.514 KB) | DOI: 10.55816/mpi.v31i2.505

Abstract

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the pancreas and biliary brushes is a minimally invasive method ofcytology sampling. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of examination of biliary brushcytology and EUS-FNA pancreas based on the System of standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobilliary cytology(STNPC) as well as cytology characteristics of pancreatic malignancy.MethodsA search of the biliary brush preparation and EUS-FNA pancreatic in 2017-2020 was carried out in the Archives section of the Department ofAnatomical Pathology FKUI / RSCM. 506 cases of biliary brush cytology and EUS-FNA pancreatic, conducted a search of histopathologicalpreparations and re-categorized based on STNPC.ResultsCytological cases of biliary brushing and pancreatic EUS-FNA paired with histopathology in 2017-2020 151 cases, 85 cases of biliarybrushing and 66 cases of pancreatic EUS-FNA, were re-categorized based on STNPC with results of biliary brushing 27 non-diagnosticcases, 24 atypical cases, 7 suspicious for malignancy (SFM) cases and 17 malignant cases. Meanwhile, for pancreatic EUS-FNA cytology16 non-diagnostic cases, 2 negative cases, 16 atypical cases, 3 other neoplasms, 4 SFM cases and 25 malignant cases. Twenty sevencases of false negative biliary brushes on non-diagnostic and atypical preparations and 4 cases of false negative on pancreatic EUS-FNA onnon-diagnostic and atypical preparations. Biliary brushing diagnostic test results: sensitivity 82.35%, specificity 100%, positive predictivevalue (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 84.21% and accuracy 90.9%. In pancreatic EUS-FNA: sensitivity 84.21%, specificity100%, PPV 100%, NPV 986.67% and accuracy 92.86%.ConclusionCytological diagnosis of biliary brushing and pancreatic EUS-FNA has good specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, but definitive diagnosisrequires histopathological examination
Akurasi Diagnostik dan Analisis Gambaran Sitomorfologi Sikatan Bilier dan Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Pankreas Berdasarkan The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System Sarwanti; Marini Stephanie
Majalah Patologi Indonesia Vol. 31 No. 2 (2022): MPI
Publisher : Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Indonesia (IAPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55816/mpi.v31i2.505

Abstract

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the pancreas and biliary brushes is a minimally invasive method ofcytology sampling. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of examination of biliary brushcytology and EUS-FNA pancreas based on the System of standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobilliary cytology(STNPC) as well as cytology characteristics of pancreatic malignancy.MethodsA search of the biliary brush preparation and EUS-FNA pancreatic in 2017-2020 was carried out in the Archives section of the Department ofAnatomical Pathology FKUI / RSCM. 506 cases of biliary brush cytology and EUS-FNA pancreatic, conducted a search of histopathologicalpreparations and re-categorized based on STNPC.ResultsCytological cases of biliary brushing and pancreatic EUS-FNA paired with histopathology in 2017-2020 151 cases, 85 cases of biliarybrushing and 66 cases of pancreatic EUS-FNA, were re-categorized based on STNPC with results of biliary brushing 27 non-diagnosticcases, 24 atypical cases, 7 suspicious for malignancy (SFM) cases and 17 malignant cases. Meanwhile, for pancreatic EUS-FNA cytology16 non-diagnostic cases, 2 negative cases, 16 atypical cases, 3 other neoplasms, 4 SFM cases and 25 malignant cases. Twenty sevencases of false negative biliary brushes on non-diagnostic and atypical preparations and 4 cases of false negative on pancreatic EUS-FNA onnon-diagnostic and atypical preparations. Biliary brushing diagnostic test results: sensitivity 82.35%, specificity 100%, positive predictivevalue (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 84.21% and accuracy 90.9%. In pancreatic EUS-FNA: sensitivity 84.21%, specificity100%, PPV 100%, NPV 986.67% and accuracy 92.86%.ConclusionCytological diagnosis of biliary brushing and pancreatic EUS-FNA has good specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, but definitive diagnosisrequires histopathological examination
Co-Authors Marini Stephanie Ria Kodariah Ria Kodariah