Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bahtera Indonesia; Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Bébasan
Tisnasari, Sundawati
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS KESALAHAN BERBAHASA PADA SURAT RESMI ORGANISASI KELUARGA BESAR MAHASISWA FKIP UNTIRTA TAHUN 2018 (ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE ERRORS IN THE OFFICIAL LETTER OF THE STUDENT FAMILY ORGANIZATION FKIP UNTIRTA IN 2018) Tisnasari, Sundawati
BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Vol 7, No 1 (2020): BÉBASAN EDISI JUNI 2020
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/bebasan.v7i1.80

Abstract

This scientific article examines language errors in the official letter of the 2018 KBM FKIP UNTIRTA organization on PUEBI (Indonesian Spelling General Guidelines) and official letter provisions. The process of collecting data is done by referring to the technique and the technique of recording the collected data is classified according to the topic of the study. The data analysis technique is descriptive qualitative. The conclusions of this study are First, there were errors of 77 errors with the distribution of errors using PUEBI (General Indonesian Spelling Guidelines) as many as 59 errors and TKSR (Provisions for Official Letter Structure) as many as 18 errors; Second, the type of PUEBI error that dominates, namely capital letter usage errors; The three organizations that made mistakes were dominated by LSIP UKM (Student Activity Unit of the Circleof Islamic Studies and Education). Keywords: language error analysis, PUEBI, official letter structure provisionsArtikel ilmiah ini mengkaji kesalahan berbahasa pada surat resmi organisasi KBM FKIP UNTIRTA tahun 2018 pada tinjauan PUEBI (Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia ) dan ketentuan surat resmi. Proses pengumpulan data di lakukan dengan teknik simak dan teknik catat data yang terkumpul diklasifikasikan berdasarkan topik kajian. Teknik analisis data bersifat deskriftif kualitatif. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah Pertama, terdapat kesalahan sebanyak 77 buah kesalahan dengan pembagian kesalahan penggunaan PUEBI (Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia) sebanyak 59 kesalahan dan TKSR (Ketentuan Struktur Surat Resmi) sebanyak 18 buah kesalahan; Kedua, Jenis kesalahan PUEBI yang mendominasi, yaitu kesalahan pemakaian huruf besar; Ketiga organisasi yang melakukan kesalahan didominasi oleh UKM LSIP (Unit Kegiatan Mahasiswa Lingkar Studi Islam dan Pendidikan). Kata Kunci:analisis kesalahan berbahasa, PUEBI, ketentuan struktur surat resmi
ANALISIS BENTUK PENYIASATAN STRUKTUR PADA NOVEL RUMAH TANPA JENDELA KARYA ASMA NADIA Kapsah, Kapsah; Husnul Mawadah, Ade; Tisnasari, Sundawati
Bahtera Indonesia Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/bi.v5i1.66

Abstract

This study analyzes the novel using a statistical approach. The research method is a qualitative-descriptive method. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of structuring that is contained in the novel House without Windows by Asma Nadia. As for data collected through library research research techniques, see techniques and note techniques. The data used in this study are excerpts from the novel that are the source of the data. The source of the data in this study is the novel House without Windows by Asma Nadia. In addition, the data obtained are classified based on their shape in order to facilitate the analysis. Data analyzed are data that have been tested for validity by validators who are experts in their fields. Referring to the knife analysis of the stylistic approach, we found a form of structural alignment. So, it can be concluded that the form of structuring data obtained from the novel House without Window by Asma Nadia 55 data with detailed data, 9 data repetition, 4 data parallelism, 7 data anaphora, 9 data antithesis, 7 data alliteration, climax as much as 1 data, asindeton as much as 13 data, rhetorical questions as much as 4 data, and polisidenton as much as 1 data. While the least data found was polysindeton and climax data, and no anticlimactic data was found.
Co-Authors Husnul Mawadah, Ade Kapsah, Kapsah