Purwandary, Eny
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Natas,Nitis, Netes:Vaccine being Supermoom Purwandary, Eny; Kusumadewi, Icha
KONSELING RELIGI Vol 11, No 2 (2020): December 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/kr.v11i2.8729

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to see the effectiveness of the method of natas, nitis, netes as a vaccine to be supermoom in inclusive school children in Surakarta.  This study used an experimental design with a randomized matched two group design posttest only. Data collected by dividing two groups, namely the control group and the group that was given treatment with 50 participants each. Participants in this study were mothers who had children attending inclusive elementary schools with specific learning difficulties. The results of this study were the methods of natas, nitis, and netes were effective as vaccines to become supermoom.
The factors related to teacher attitudes toward inclusive schools Kusumadewi, Icha; Purwandary, Eny; Karyani, Usmi
Konselor Inpress
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/0202094109083-0-00

Abstract

This study discusses factors related to teacher attitudes toward inclusive schools. The variables studied were self efficacy (X1) and understanding of children with special needs (X2) as an independent variables  then  teacher attitude to school of inclusion as a dependent variable (Y). Data processing methods in hypothesis testing using multiple regression statistical analysis with participants in this study were teachers from inclusive schools (N=500). The results of this study indicate that there is relationship between self-efication and understanding of children with special needs toward teacher attitude to school of inclusion (p <α; 0.000 <0.05), with the effect of a contribution of 0.93 (93%). Therefore, in this study Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted