Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) UIR LAW REVIEW Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Danel Aditia Situngkir
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Ratifikasi Statuta Roma Bagi Indonesia Danel Aditia Situngkir
UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9.114 KB) | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1548

Abstract

Kehadiran Pengadilan Internasional permanen merupakan realisasi dari upaya masyarakat internasional untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia dari kejahatan-kejahatan luar biasa terhadap kemanusiaan. Pengadilan yang didirikan berdasarkan Statuta Roma tersebut telah diratifikasi oleh 123 negara. Indonesia tidak termasuk negara yang meratifikasi statuta roma tersebut yang telah mulai berlaku sejak 1 Juli 2002. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas pada tulisan ini adalah yurisdiksi Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dibandingkan dengan Pengadilan Ham di Indonesia dan urgensi statuta roma dalam kaitan dengan kedaulatan bagi indonesia. Metode Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan yang kemudian dianalisa sebagai suatu isu hukum untuk membahas urgensi ratifikasi statuta roma bagi indonesia. Dari pembahasan disimpulkan bahwa Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional lebih lengkap dari Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia dan urgensi ratifikasi statuta roma jika dikaitkan dengan kedaulatan negara tidak perlu dikhawatirkan karena mahkamah hanya untuk melengkapi sebagaimana prinsip komplementaris dalam statuta roma.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA INDIVIDU DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INTERNASIONAL Danel Aditia Situngkir
JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Vol 19 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.974 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v19i1.834

Abstract

The debate about the whereabouts of individuals as the subject of international law over time seems to get an answer. This is because after the first and second world wars, the international community's attention to human rights is increasing. The desire to bring the responsible perpetrators into account before the criminal court is increasing. Efforts to eliminate immunity against perpetrators for crimes committed encourage the establishment of international criminal tribunals ranging from the ad hoc nature to the permanent criminal court. Encouraging individuals as the holders of rights and obligations in international criminal law is getting stronger. It becomes more interesting because the individuals held accountable are citizens who actually have the sovereignty to enforce the law to their citizens. This paper will discuss the existence of individuals as subjects of international law and the effort to hold individuals accountable through international court mechanisms. Based on legal theory, legal principles, sources of international law and international treaties, the existence of individuals in international law can be seen from the granting of rights and obligations in international treaties. The Adhoc and Permanent International Criminal Court is established to demand the accountability of serious crimes against humanity. The existence of individuals as subjects of international law in the future will remain a polemic in its application. Keywords: Responsibility, Individual, International Criminal Law.
TERIKATNYA NEGARA DALAM PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL Danel Aditia Situngkir
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.885 KB) | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2018.v2.i2.p167-180

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of the binding of the state in international agreements. The more complex the relations between international legal subjects making international customs can no longer be used to resolve the various problems that arise. In modern international relations, the existence of international treaties is mandatory. The issues discussed in this paper are the role of the state in international treaties and how the state is bound in international treaties. Both of these issues are examined with normative juridical approaches based on legal theory, legal principles, international law sources and international agreements. From the discussion it was concluded that the role of the state in international agreements will influence the actions of the state against international agreements. The binding of the state in international agreements is caused by the actions of the state and the contents of international agreements. a third country may be bound by the contents of an international treaty if the norm set forth therein is part of the jus cogens.
Co-Authors