Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika
Mochamad Basarah
Fakultas Hukum UNISBA
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Prospektif Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia Basarah, Mochamad
Syiar Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2007): Syiar Madani
Publisher : LPPM Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengadilan selain dapat dilihat sebagai lembaga penegakan hukum, juga merupakan lembaga ekonomi dan politik. merupakan simbol harapan masyarakat terhadap keadilan. Pengadilan sebagai lembaga penegakan hukum memiliki fungsi penting sebagai simbol negara hukum. Sangat banyak kasus yang terdapat dalam mahkamah agung sehingga perlu dicari solusi untuk mengatasinya melalui klasifikasi kasus, sehingga dapat diselesaikan melalui pengadilan tertentu
PELAKSANAAN ASAS KETERTIBAN UMUM DI PENGADILAN NASIONAL TERHADAP PUTUSAN BADAN ARBITRASE ASING (LUAR NEGERI) Basarah, Mochamad
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 22, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (526.498 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v22i1.3

Abstract

New York convention was designed to give international value to decision of arbitration and also has regulated two items in arbitration mechanism, that is to say recognition of arbitration clause, and also recognition and implementation of arbitration decision. National court of justice related to this mechanism will adapt itself to convention regulations. This case is possible to appear although every party has chosen substantive law from different countries to regulate their agreements, because court of justice can refuse arbitration decision if it is assumed to violate against public order.Keywords: New York Convention ­ Principle of Public Order ­  National Court of
BEBERAPA PANDANGAN HISTORIS DAN PRAKTIK PELAKSANAAN DOKTRIN REBUS SIC STANTIBUS DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Basarah, Mochamad
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 24, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (590.493 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v24i1.15

Abstract

By rebus sic stantibus, the countries with their efforts could demand their rights back. Differences in terminology can thus blurthe differencesand the similarities in theimplementation. The International Law Commission has rejected the usage of the terminology of rebus sic stantibus. They prefer using the terminology of the doctrine of fundamental changes on equality and justice reasons, and getting rid of the terminology of rebus sic stantibus as it is assumed to cause unintended effects. This doctrine, in fact has been performed, primarily after the end of the war between the allies and Germany. A conditional change can be expressed, although it can not properly be predicted before. It depends on the intention and the hopes of the concerned parties, and intended change characteristic as well which may appear from suspension and restriction of doctrine implementation according to the circumstances of that time.Keywords: Rebus sic stantibus - International Law -Implementation
Co-Authors