Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Ade Adhari
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanegara
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016) Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (441.543 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1715

Abstract

This paper reveals fundamental questions about the implications of the school of positivism for science and law enforcement in the Constitutional Court. The study results show First, at the level of jurisprudence, this school understands its adherents that jurisprudence as “a normological understanding of the meaning of positive law (normological apprehension of the meaning of positive law)”. The development of jurisprudence is then carried out through the activities of studying, researching and teaching various positive laws, “which in the end the development of jurisprudence is more towards” dogmatic jurisprudence “. Second, at the level of law enforcement in the Constitutional Court, the implication of judges is to base the process of law enforcement as stipulated in the positive norms of statutory regulations. Upholding the law becomes synonymous with enforcing positive rules. Judges as legal bearers are practically proficient in reading and sounding positive law in their legal decisions. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 related to the existence of adultery in the Criminal Code is one of the decisions that have a strong influence from this school.
Konstitusionalitas Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Hak Ulayat Rumpon di Provinsi Lampung Ahmad Redi; Yuwono Prianto; Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (544.187 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1431

Abstract

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.
Sinergitas Kabinet Presidensiil Multipartai pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (443.455 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1828

Abstract

Implement the simultaneous election in Indonesia has supported by the multiparty system. The multiparty system has an impact on the President’s leadership. In the formation of the cabinet, the President must accommodate political party coalition interest. One form of that accommodations occurs of the minister which came from the coalition political party. Different from the minister's interest background has an impact on the different policies each minister especially on COVID-19 handler in Indonesia. The research method is normative research with a case approach and concept approach. This research used secondary data that used primary, secondary, and tertiary materials. This research shows that the presidential cabinet in Indonesia is a cabinet which forms by multi-party coalitions. On multiparty coalition implementation of Kabinet Indonesia Maju 2019-2024, there were several times, the minister has different policy among the minister or with local governments such as the case of the ban on taking passengers for online biking and prohibition against homecoming. Different policies among the minister or with local government can be minimized by the President’s political leadership.
Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016) Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (441.543 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1715

Abstract

This paper reveals fundamental questions about the implications of the school of positivism for science and law enforcement in the Constitutional Court. The study results show First, at the level of jurisprudence, this school understands its adherents that jurisprudence as “a normological understanding of the meaning of positive law (normological apprehension of the meaning of positive law)”. The development of jurisprudence is then carried out through the activities of studying, researching and teaching various positive laws, “which in the end the development of jurisprudence is more towards” dogmatic jurisprudence “. Second, at the level of law enforcement in the Constitutional Court, the implication of judges is to base the process of law enforcement as stipulated in the positive norms of statutory regulations. Upholding the law becomes synonymous with enforcing positive rules. Judges as legal bearers are practically proficient in reading and sounding positive law in their legal decisions. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 related to the existence of adultery in the Criminal Code is one of the decisions that have a strong influence from this school.
Konstitusionalitas Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Hak Ulayat Rumpon di Provinsi Lampung Ahmad Redi; Yuwono Prianto; Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (544.187 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1431

Abstract

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.
Sinergitas Kabinet Presidensiil Multipartai pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (443.455 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1828

Abstract

Implement the simultaneous election in Indonesia has supported by the multiparty system. The multiparty system has an impact on the President’s leadership. In the formation of the cabinet, the President must accommodate political party coalition interest. One form of that accommodations occurs of the minister which came from the coalition political party. Different from the minister's interest background has an impact on the different policies each minister especially on COVID-19 handler in Indonesia. The research method is normative research with a case approach and concept approach. This research used secondary data that used primary, secondary, and tertiary materials. This research shows that the presidential cabinet in Indonesia is a cabinet which forms by multi-party coalitions. On multiparty coalition implementation of Kabinet Indonesia Maju 2019-2024, there were several times, the minister has different policy among the minister or with local governments such as the case of the ban on taking passengers for online biking and prohibition against homecoming. Different policies among the minister or with local government can be minimized by the President’s political leadership.
Co-Authors Ahmad Redi Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Yuwono Prianto