Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.218
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF AL-ADZKA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN GURU MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara QUALITY Auladuna Ta'allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama EDUHUMANIORA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Ibtida'iy : Jurnal Prodi PGMI Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Basicedu El Midad : Jurnal Jurusan PGMI FONDATIA DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education AIUA Journal of Islamic Education Akademika: Jurnal Keagamaan dan Pendidikan Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam Waniambey: Journal of Islamic Education An-Nur : Jurnal Studi Islam Jurnal Basicedu Attaqwa:Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam
Andi Prastowo
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ta'allum:%20Jurnal%20Pendidikan%20Islam

 1 
EVALUASI KURIKULUM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB UNTUK PERBAIKAN MUTU AKADEMIK DI MI MAMBAUL MA’ARIF Uswatun Chasanah; Andi Prastowo
Ta'allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 9 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299

Abstract

Abstract: The research was conducted to find out the form of instruments used in the evaluation of the Arabic language learning curriculum in MI. This study uses a case study method at MI Mambaul Ma'arif. The research subject of the teacher of Arabic subjects. Data collection techniques with interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique is carried out by inductive analysis techniques. The results revealed that there are four types of curriculum evaluation, namely formative evaluation, summative evaluation, input evaluation, and product evaluation. The instrument forms used are test and nontest. Test instruments are classified into nen types, and twelve types of non-test types. The selection of instrument forms must be following the needs and characteristics of the learners. And teachers have no difficulty in making and implementing these forms of instruments when conducting evaluations either in the form of tests or nontests. If the results shown have not reached the minimum standard, it is necessary to provide follow-up in the form of remedial activities. And if it has reached the minimum standard, enrichment activities may be given.
EVALUASI KURIKULUM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB UNTUK PERBAIKAN MUTU AKADEMIK DI MI MAMBAUL MA’ARIF Uswatun Chasanah; Andi Prastowo
Ta'allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 9 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan (FTIK) UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299

Abstract

Abstract: The research was conducted to find out the form of instruments used in the evaluation of the Arabic language learning curriculum in MI. This study uses a case study method at MI Mambaul Ma'arif. The research subject of the teacher of Arabic subjects. Data collection techniques with interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique is carried out by inductive analysis techniques. The results revealed that there are four types of curriculum evaluation, namely formative evaluation, summative evaluation, input evaluation, and product evaluation. The instrument forms used are test and nontest. Test instruments are classified into nen types, and twelve types of non-test types. The selection of instrument forms must be following the needs and characteristics of the learners. And teachers have no difficulty in making and implementing these forms of instruments when conducting evaluations either in the form of tests or nontests. If the results shown have not reached the minimum standard, it is necessary to provide follow-up in the form of remedial activities. And if it has reached the minimum standard, enrichment activities may be given.
Co-Authors Ahmad Khawani Ani Khoirotun Nisa Badratun Nafis Baroroh , R. Umi Deni Setiawan Desi Asmarita Effiana Cahya Ningrum Emha Dzia’ul Haq Fatiya Sakinah Finy Fitriani Indri Mahmudah Khafidhotul Baroroh Lusiana Lusiana Maulidyah Safruddin Maya Rahma Sarita Mei Akbar Velayati Muhammad Iqbal Nashrulloh Muhammad Najib Nafizaturrahmi Nafizaturrahmi Naila Husna Ramadhana Rahma Annisa Rahmah Desfitria Ravi Dwi Ramandhika Rif'atul Ajizah Salwa Atika Sari Sarjono Sarjono Sunedi Sunedi Uswatun Chasanah Winda Nur Febrianti Zahratul Fitria Zainal Asrin Nasution