Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ)
Willy Talentaniko
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Antinomi Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Muhammad Taufiq Hafid; Willy Talentaniko; Yudi Pratama Tanjung
Amsir Law Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36746/alj.v2i1.27

Abstract

Government Regulation a Substitute for laws (Perppu) is president right to regulate something in terms of compelling urgency. Perppu issued by the president must be immediately determined by the House of Representatives to be declared rejected or accepted. Article 24 C Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945 stipulates that authority of Constitutional Court is to only examine the law against Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945, not the Perppu. However, Constitutional Court through decision No. 138 / PUU-VII / 2009 states that the Constitutional Court has authority to examine Perppu against Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945. The Perppu made by president make a new legal norms that give rise to new legal status, new legal relationships and new legal consequences. Constitutional Court interprets that norms contained in Perppu are as binding as norms in the law. In conducting tests, Constitutional Court does not distinguish between formal and material laws.
Co-Authors Muhammad Taufiq Hafid Yudi Pratama Tanjung