Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Al-'Adalah Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman KEADILAN PROGRESIF JAWI : Journal of Southeast Asia Islamic Contemporary Issues JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN El Izdiwaj Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law
Faisal Faisal
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman

 1 
SEJARAH PENGELOLAAN ZAKAT DI DUNIA MUSLIM DAN INDONESIA (Pendekatan Teori Investigasi-Sejarah Charles Peirce dan Defisit Kebenaran Lieven Boeve) Faisal Faisal
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 11, No 2 (2011): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.629 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v11i2.612

Abstract

Throughout the history of human life, poverty is a “plot of story” that could never be erased, and the history of human life is inevitably not free from the history of how people try various ways to overcome this problem. Alms giving (zakat) is one solution that Islam called upon to remove poverty and economic inequalities. Classical as well as Modern Islamic World has enacted various laws and run variety of alms (zakat) management patterns in order to alleviate such poverty. This article covers the application of such charity in the long history of alms giving, since the classical age of Islam to the realities of current application in modern   times   in   some   Islamic   countries,   with   main   focus,   the application  of  alms  in  Indonesia.  By  using  historical  investigation theory of Charles Peirce and truth deficit of Lieven Boeve, the authors  found  a  number  of  polarization  on  the  practices  of  alms withdrawal and its management in Indonesia which further led to a deficit or a reduction in the role and function of such alms itself, which once reached the golden age in the heyday of Islam. This happens due to many factors, including the ineffectiveness of the implementation of the Law of alms (zakat), the lack of trust in the institution of zakat, and the lack of awareness of those compulsory Muslims to give alm. Overcoming such a deficit, it needs integral and solid steps of thestate and society in the spirit of recontectualization of zakat.
Criticism of Reason against the Blasphemy of Ijma as a Source of Islamic Law Moh. Bahrudin; Faisal Faisal; Hanif Hanif
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 22, No 1 (2022): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (669.38 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v22i1.12527

Abstract

The study and critique of reasoning against the blasphemy of ijmak aims to place the position of ijmak proportionally and rationally, in accordance with the initial objectives of the ijmak theory formulated in the early days of Islam so that there are no misperceptions about the blasphemy of ijmak. Indeed, ijmak as a source of Islamic law requires the existence of evidence based on the Qur'an and Hadith, it cannot stand alone independently. However, furthermore, ijmak only becomes a support for the status quo of the fiqh laws produced by the cleric contained in fiqh books. This research is intended to look at the blasphemy of ijmak as a source of Islamic law. The method used is descriptive method. Conclusions are drawn by using deductive thinking. Research shows that ijmak can be used as evidence, has validity and authority, although it still requires evidence from the Qur'an or Sunnah. Not all ijmak is qath'i and therefore not all ijmak must be followed. The blasphemy quality of ijmak is qath'i if it is supported by texts that are qath'i or related to matters that are 'ulima min al-din bi al-dharurah. The quality of ijmak is zhanni if it is only supported by zhanni's argument or in matters for which there is no explicit text in the syarak text.
Co-Authors Asriani Asriani Dani Amran Hakim Fathul Mu’in Hanif Hanif Is Susanto Miswanto Moh Bahrudin Moh. Mukri