Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Unnes Law Journal
Auria Patria Dilaga
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaruh Keterangan Ahli terhadap Keyakinan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dilaga, Auria Patria
Pandecta Vol 8, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fakta apa yang terungkap ketika keterangan ahli disampaikan dalam sidang perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kedudukan keterangan ahli dalam mempengaruhi keyakinan hakim dalam putusan perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah yuridis sosiologis dengan metode pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa fakta yang terungkap ketika keterangan ahli disampaikan di persidangan adalah terkait dengan keahlian khusus yang dimilikinya sehingga mendapatkan persesuian dengan alat bukti yang lain untuk membantu hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara. Adapun kedudukan keterangan ahli sama halnya dengan alat bukti lain, namun memiliki fungsi dalam menjadikan terang perkara karena ahli yang dihadapkan disidang pengadilan memberikan keterangan dari keahliannya sehingga hakim memperoleh pemahaman dari perkara secara utuh. This study is intended to determine what the facts are revealed when expert testimony presented in the trial of corruption cases and to find out how the experts position to influence the judge in the decision of conviction corruption cases. This is a juridical -sociological research in which using the qualitative approach. The results of this research shows that facts revealed when expert testimony presented at the hearing was related to its particular expertise so get persesuian with other evidence to assist the judge in settling cases. In addition the position of experts as well as other evidence, but it has a function in making light of the case as presented expert testimony from the trial court gave the judge his expertise gained an understanding of the whole case.
Pengaruh Keterangan Ahli terhadap Keyakinan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dilaga, Auria Patria
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v8i1.2357

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fakta apa yang terungkap ketika keterangan ahli disampaikan dalam sidang perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kedudukan keterangan ahli dalam mempengaruhi keyakinan hakim dalam putusan perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah yuridis sosiologis dengan metode pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa fakta yang terungkap ketika keterangan ahli disampaikan di persidangan adalah terkait dengan keahlian khusus yang dimilikinya sehingga mendapatkan persesuian dengan alat bukti yang lain untuk membantu hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara. Adapun kedudukan keterangan ahli sama halnya dengan alat bukti lain, namun memiliki fungsi dalam menjadikan terang perkara karena ahli yang dihadapkan disidang pengadilan memberikan keterangan dari keahliannya sehingga hakim memperoleh pemahaman dari perkara secara utuh. This study is intended to determine what the facts are revealed when expert testimony presented in the trial of corruption cases and to find out how the experts position to influence the judge in the decision of conviction corruption cases. This is a juridical -sociological research in which using the qualitative approach. The results of this research shows that facts revealed when expert testimony presented at the hearing was related to its particular expertise so get persesuian with other evidence to assist the judge in settling cases. In addition the position of experts as well as other evidence, but it has a function in making light of the case as presented expert testimony from the trial court gave the judge his expertise gained an understanding of the whole case.
Politics of Law on Protection to Folklore in a Regional Autonomy Perspective: Rights for Indigenous People Dilaga, Auria Patria
JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 2 No 1 (2017): The Various Aspects of Human Rights in Indonesia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (450.015 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v2i01.16634

Abstract

The study of political law on protection of folklore with the perspective of regional autonomy is expected to be realized ideal protection. The problem in this research is why folklore needs to be protected in the perspective of regional autonomy and how the political law of folklore protection in the regional autonomy perspective. This research approach method using normative juridical approach method. The result of this research is folklore needs to be protected because it is part of the wealth of the Republic of Indonesia. Folklore needs to be protected in the perspective of regional autonomy because it is a work that was born and developed and preserved in their respective regions. The politics of law of folklore protection in the perspective of regional autonomy is by making technical implementation policy up to the level of local regulations for the benefit of folklore protection, one of them with the policy of inventory. The conclusions and suggestions in the research are folklore is a human work that must be protected especially in the perspective of regional autonomy and it is advisable to immediately pass a regulation on the protection of folklore.
Pengaruh Keterangan Ahli Terhadap Keyakinan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dilaga, Auria Patria
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.293 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2897

Abstract

The purpose of study to determine what the facts are revealed when expert testimony presented in the trial of corruption cases and to find out how the experts position to influence the judge in the decision of conviction corruption cases. Research in writing is a juridical sociological method is a qualitative approach. With the data source is primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are: 1) The study of literature, 2) Observation, 3) Interview. The results of this research are: 1) The fact revealed when expert testimony presented at the hearing was related to its particular expertise so get persesuian with other evidence to assist the judge in settling cases. 2) Position the experts as well as other evidence, but it has a function in making light of the case as presented expert testimony from the trial court gave the judge his expertise gained an understanding of the whole case. The conclusions of this research are: 1) The fact that is expressed in the form of expert opinions that can help judges resolve cases duntuk because experts have different skills and competencies delivered testimony also differed among the experts. 2) Position the experts in corruption cases be generalized to other evidence, but the Criminal Code has the role of expert testimony to clarify or make light of a case.
Politics of Law on Protection to Folklore in a Regional Autonomy Perspective: Rights for Indigenous People Dilaga, Auria Patria
JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 2 No 1 (2017): The Various Aspects of Human Rights in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v2i01.16634

Abstract

The study of political law on protection of folklore with the perspective of regional autonomy is expected to be realized ideal protection. The problem in this research is why folklore needs to be protected in the perspective of regional autonomy and how the political law of folklore protection in the regional autonomy perspective. This research approach method using normative juridical approach method. The result of this research is folklore needs to be protected because it is part of the wealth of the Republic of Indonesia. Folklore needs to be protected in the perspective of regional autonomy because it is a work that was born and developed and preserved in their respective regions. The politics of law of folklore protection in the perspective of regional autonomy is by making technical implementation policy up to the level of local regulations for the benefit of folklore protection, one of them with the policy of inventory. The conclusions and suggestions in the research are folklore is a human work that must be protected especially in the perspective of regional autonomy and it is advisable to immediately pass a regulation on the protection of folklore.
Co-Authors