Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Presumption of Innocent v. Presumption of Guilt dalam Hak Asasi Manusia Mada Apriandi Zuhir; Nurhidayatuloh Nurhidayatuloh; Annisa Fitri Arum; Nyimas Olivia; Fatimatuz Zuhro; Faiq Tobroni
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 26 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2019
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (496.371 KB) | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v26i2.539

Abstract

Asas presumption of guilt menjadi semakin menarik untuk dibahas sebagai respon dari ketidakpuasan asas presumption of innocent untuk diterapkan dalam kasus-kasus tertentu. Apalagi asas presumption of innocent hadir bukan tanpa dasar dan asas ini muncul sebagai amanah Deklarasi HAM Universal sebagai hak fundamental manusia. Namun demikian bagimana jika asas ini dihadapkan dengan kasus-kasus yang luar biasa seperti kasus terorisme dan kepabeanan. Hal ini menjadi persoalan oleh karena di satu sisi hal ini merupakan hak fundamental, namun di sisi lain ada hal luar biasa yang menjadi persoalan apabila asas ini tetap diterapkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan case law dengan analisis deskriptif kualitatif, yakni dengan menghadirkan putusan-putusan Pengadilan HAM Eropa yang pernah membahas persoalan tentang presumption of guilt. Paling tidak ada satu kasus penting yang putusannya dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam membahas soal presumption of guilt ini yakni kasus Salabiaku v. France. Kasus ini menjadi rujukan yang mengikat oleh hakim-hakim di Pengadilan HAM Eropa dan telah dikutip oleh hakim-hakim di penadilan lain. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalam keadaan tertentu presumption of guiltdapat diterapkan dengan catatan negara harus membatasi penerapan prinsip ini dengan cara yang reasonable dengan mempertimbangkan apa resiko yang dipertaruhkan dan apa implikasinya jika asas ini tidak diterapka
NUSYŪZ DALAM TINJAUAN PRINSIP HAM Faiq Tobroni
Al-Maslahah : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 16, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah (Syari'ah Faculty )

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/al-maslahah.v16i1.1783

Abstract

This paper aims to use human rights principles to reconsider nusyūz's arrangements in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesian. This goal will be achieved by answering two questions, namely: what are the problems arising from the regulation of nusyūz? and why does the regulation need to be reviewed? This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature approach. Data obtained through documentation. This study found that the Compilation of Islamic Law actually narrowed the adoption of nusyūz only to wives, resulting in unequal relations which is gender biased. Shar'i arguments to expand the enactment of nusyūz can be obtained through a combination of An-Nisa 'Verses 34 and 128. In addition, it can be felt as a special paradigm of equality according to the human rights principles brought under Law 1/1974 and Law 32/2004. The concept of nusyūz which only applies to wives alone is a denial of the principle of equality in the concept of human rights, and also has weaknesses when juxtaposed with the concept of equality of husband and wife relations (Law 1/1974) and the concept of criminal liability that applies to both when doing violence (Law 32/2004).
ALASAN HARGA DIRI PADA PRAKTEK CAROK (TINJAUAN HAM DAN HUKUM ISLAM) Bagis Syarof; Faiq Tobroni
TAHKIM Vol 16, No 1 (2020): TAHKIM
Publisher : IAIN Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33477/thk.v16i1.1453

Abstract

Conflicts between humans often occur. The solution also varies. Some times it is done through a good conversation, or it can be with a fight, and even through legal channels. There is something interesting about one of the tribes in Indonesia, namely Madura. When experiencing conflict with other people, they take the solution through carok (fight with sickles). The common cause of carok is conflict related to the throne, wealth and women. The enemies are considered to lower their self-esteem, when it has disturbed these three things. As a consequence, carok becomes a solution to restore self-esteem that is lowered. This paper is the result of qualitative research with literature approach. This study questions how the reasons for self-esteem in the practice of carok in terms of Islamic law and human rights? As a finding, the authors conclude that although Islamic law and human rights do justify the protection of self-esteem for everyone, the reasons for self-defense through carok are not justified in Islamic law because they violate qishos law and are also not justified in human rights because they are not under national law. Keywords: carok, islamic law, human rights.
Penanganan Covid-19 Dan Pengembangan Hukum Ham Konteks Indonesia: - Faiq Tobroni
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 2 (2020): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/ijh.v17i2.2294

Abstract

In dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic, the Indonesian government uses Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) as an option to accelerate the handling of Covid-19. There is a narrative struggle regarding the limitation of human rights behind the policy of implementing the PSBB. The research uses a form of normative juridical legal research. Retrieving data through documentation, and data analysis through reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The narrative struggle that occurs regarding the protection of rights in handling Covid-19 is shown by the tug-of-war between the interests of health and the rights of community activities, where the policy of limitation has implications for the fulfillment of life's needs. The implementation of PSBB in Indonesia must be done optimally by improving domestic human rights legal instruments by incorporating public health and safety factors as the legality of human rights restrictions.