Articles
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN PADA KASUS TINDAK PIDANA ANAK DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SURAKARTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Wulandari Putri Hutami]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 10, No 3: 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i3.70243
<![CDATA[Artikel ini dibuat bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 1 angka 6 huruf a Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana serta problematika pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan dalam mengeksekusi kasus tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Jenis dan sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah studi kepustakaan dan wawancara hanya sebagai pelengkap yang merupakan bahan nonhukum dalam bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme yang bersifat deduktif atau deduksi silogisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta telah sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 1 angka 6 huurf a Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Jaksa di Kejaksaan Negeri Surakarta selaku eksekutor pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta mendapati sejumlah problematika pada pelaksanaan eksekusi pidana penjara dan pidana pelatihan kerja yang mana terjadi penolakan pada Lembaga bimbingan Karir yang telah diputusan oleh hakim. Untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut Anak ditempatkan di Rutan Kelas 1 Kota Surakarta dan di tempatkan di YPAN Bhina Putera Kota Surakarta.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS UPAYA PEMBUKTIAN PENUNTUT UMUM ATAS PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA EKSPLOITASI TERHADAP ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 93/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Spt) ]]>
<![CDATA[Welcome Immanuel Pakpahan]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 10, No 2: 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i2.67621
<![CDATA[Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian upaya pembuktian perkara eksploitasi terhadap anak dibawah umur oleh Penuntut Umum dengan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan penelitian hukum ini adalah pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah metode silogisme dengan menggunakan pola pikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa upaya pembuktian perkara eksploitasi terhadap anak dibawah umur oleh Penuntut Umum yang termuat dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sampit Nomor 93/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Spt telah sesuai dengan Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP karena Penuntut Umum di persidangan telah menghadirkan alat-alat bukti yang sah yaitu keterangan saksi dan keterangan terdakwa, serta barang bukti sebagai penunjang alat bukti.Kata kunci: Alat Bukti; Eksploitasi Terhadap Anak; PembuktianAbstrct: This study aims to determine the suitability of efforts to prove cases of exploitation of minors by the Public Prosecutor with Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The type of research used is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach is a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is literature study. The legal material analysis technique used in writing this law is the syllogism method using a deductive mindset. The results of this study indicate that efforts to prove cases of exploitation of minors by the Public Prosecutor as contained in the Sampit District Court Decision Number 93/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Spt have been in accordance with Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code because the Public Prosecutor at trial has present valid evidence, namely witness testimony and the defendant's statement, as well as evidence as supporting evidence.Keywords: Evidence; Exploitation of Children; Evidence]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH CELAH PEMENUHAN PIDANA DENDA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM BAGI PENGEDAR NARKOTIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiwik Diah Muliasih]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71603
<![CDATA[The severity of the crimes imposed in narcotics crimes is in fact unable to eradicate its circulation and illicit trafficking. The purpose ofthe study was to examine the loopholes in the fulfillment of criminal fines for narcotics dealers in Decision Number: 19/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg. Themethod usedis normative legal research. The results of the research study show that the sentence imposedinaquocaseis in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law in the Criminal Procedure Code. Nevertheless, the sentencing ruling that was handed down still seems to leave a loophole in sentencing, namely when the concept of imposing a finewith a substitute prison sentence causes a bad formulation because the purpose of the conviction is notappleto apple. In this case, the purpose of the fine is to deprive him of wealth while the penalty of imprisonment is aimed at depriving him of liberty. Such criticisms in particular can be observedin the lens of theoretical legal development and practical legal development.Keywords: Dealers; Fine; Narcotics Crimes]]>
<![CDATA[KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM BANDING DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DENGAN PASAL 241 KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Neiska Aulia Marcela Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72296
<![CDATA[This research examines the problem whether the considerations of the panel of appellate judges that giving verdict of upheld the previous court’s decision to the defendant in case number : 237/Pid/2022/PT SMG in accordance with article 241 of The Criminal Procedure Code. Based on the result of the research and discussion it was concluded that the considerations of the panel of judges of appeal who examined and decided on the case in case number : 237/Pid/2022/PT SMG were accordance with article 241 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judges stated that they strengthened the Klaten District Court Verdict Number : 41/Pid.B/2022/PN Kln which stated that the defendant Eko Prayitno bin Nyamin had been legally and convincingly proven guilty of commiting an act of fraud joinly.Keywords: Considerations of The Panel of Judges of Appeal, Criminal Acts of Fraud, Judge’s Decision]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BEBAS AKIBAT PENGABAIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 992KPID2020) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ditria Fridyaswari Twenthina]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72840
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine the suitability of the Supreme Court's considerations in canceling the acquittal by Judex Factie in the rape case against Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The type of legal research in this article is normative legal research with a case approach. The technique used in collecting legal materials in this research is literature study. This study uses an analytical technique with the nature of deduction using the syllogistic method, which begins with proposing a major premise, followed by proposing a minor premise in the form of legal facts and conclusions will be drawn from these two premises. Based on this research, it was found that the Judex Factie judge at the Oelamasi District Court was proven not to have applied a rule of law or a rule of law was not applied as it should. So that the consideration of the Supreme Court in canceling the acquittal by Judex Factie in the rape case was correct and in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.Keywords: Supreme Court; Consideration; Visum et Repertum]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KESEHATAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 14/PID.SUS/2021/PN PTI) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ana Pristiwijayani]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73101
<![CDATA[Abstract: The research conducted by the author aims to determine the consider of judges in a rule deciding criminal cases by deliberately producing or distributing pharmaceutical preparations without a marketing license and the consider (verdict study Number: 14/Pid.Sus/2022 / PN Pti). This type of legal research is normative legal research and prescriptive and applied. The research approach uses a case approach. Legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is the study of literature. The analysis used is syllogism deduction. Based on the results of the study showed that, first, the position of pharmacologists compared to other evidence is the same as long as the conditions as valid evidence are met. Second, the consideration of the District Court judge in examining and deciding the criminal case by the defendant Ahmad Nur Muchlisin is following Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has met at least two valid pieces of evidence, and the pharmacologist's statement does not have a binding evidentiary force value. Keywords: Health Crimes; Trihexyphenidyl; Evidence; Judge’s Consideration]]>
<![CDATA[PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI PIDANA PENJARA KEPADA ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN (Putusan Nomor: 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr) ]]>
<![CDATA[Charista Eforina Waruwu]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.60237
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine the suitability of the judge's decision in imposing prison sentences on children who are perpetrators of abuse based on the provisions of Article 354 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code and the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach is a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials used in writing this law is the syllogism method using deductive thinking patterns. The results of this study indicate that the judge's decision in the Enrekang District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr has given a decision that is not in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 79 Paragraph (2) of the Child Criminal Protection System Act. because the Judge did not give consideration that refers to Article 354 of the Criminal Code.Keywords: Judge's Decision, Persecution, Child Defendant]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI FAKTOR PENENTU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 208/PID.B/2022/PN BDG ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Bagus Anggoro Bangun]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.78474
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine how the Magistrate Judges' legal considerations are based on Visum et Repertum and how Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving theft charges with violence resulting in death in death Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg. This is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied to case studies. The technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used for this research is a documental study and literature materials. Regarding the results of the research and discussion, it can be seen that the considerations of the Magistrate Judges in Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg have included juridical and non-juridical aspects. Magistrate Judges require the opinion of a doctor as outlined in the Visum et Repertum, bearing in mind that the judge as a case breaker is not equipped with knowledge related to forensic medicine, so he must pay attention to Visum et Repertum as one piece of evidence that is adapted to other evidence. In addition, Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving the indictment of Decision 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg because it has strength in evidence, namely through matching Visum et Repertum with witness statements, which results are used as conclusions for judges who can be used as a consideration in determining whether a crime has occurred or not and determining the guilt of the defendant at trial.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENERAPKAN PASAL 2 UU TIPIKOR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR77/PID.SUS-TPK/2018/PN.KDI) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aulia Putri Khairunnisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75275
<![CDATA[This research examines the problem, what are the legal considerations of judges in applying Article 2 of the Corruption Crime Law to Decision Number 77/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Kdi. The research method in writing this journal is normative legal research. This method involves an analysis of legal materials in the form of applicable legal regulations and existing legal documents. The legal material in this study is Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes which is focused on Article 2. The results of the research show that as a judge has a great responsibility in making decisions that are fair and based on the law. Some of the legal considerations that must be considered by the judge in making a decision include applicable law, existing facts and evidence, principles of justice, public policy considerations, appropriate punishment, and the interests of the victim. Keywords: Corruption Crime, Judge's Legal Considerations; Article 2 of the Corruption Law]]>
