Saoki Saoki
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

METODE ISTINBATH HAZAIRIN TENTANG HUKUM WARIS Saoki Saoki
AL-HUKAMA: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/al-hukama.2015.5.1.123-147

Abstract

Abstract: This study focuses to answer the two fundamental questions. First, how is the legal reasoning method used by Hazarin in classifying heirs? and how is the contribution of Hazarin in the Islamic law renewal in Indonesia? This study uses a legal reasoning approach of Islamic law. Through this approach, it can be seen the methodology of legal reasoning used by Hazairin. The study concludes that the legal reasoning method which is used by Hazarin in classifying heirs: first, there is a tendency to use the principles of the legal maxim. They are the bayani and ta’lili method; second, the contributionn of Hazairin’s methodology of the legal reasoning in grouping heirs to the Islamic law is his attempt to uplift the grandson from the lineage of women as heirs who are entitled to participate in the division of inheritance through the institution of substitute heirs. It is according to some Muslim scholars is called zawu al-arham and they do not distinguish about the shape brother.Abstrak: Penelitian ini difokuskan untuk menjawab dua pertanyaan mendasar. Pertama, bagaimana metode penalaran hukum yang digunakan oleh Hazarin dalam mengklasifikasikan ahli waris? dan bagaimana kontribusi Hazarin dalam pembaruan hukum Islam di Indonesia? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan pertimbangan hukum dari hukum Islam. Melalui pendekatan ini, dapat dilihat metodologi penalaran hukum yang digunakan oleh Hazairin. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa metode penalaran hukum yang digunakan oleh Hazarin dalam mengklasifikasikan ahli waris: pertama, ada kecenderungan untuk menggunakan prinsip-prinsip ushul fiqh. Ada penggunaan metode bayani dan metode ta'lili; kedua, kontribusi Hazairin dalam metodologi penalaran hukum, yaitu pengelompokan ahli waris dalam hukum Islam dengan upaya untuk mengangkat cucu dari garis keturunan perempuan sebagai ahli waris yang berhak untuk berpartisipasi dalam pembagian waris melalui lembaga ahli waris pengganti. Hal ini menurut sebagian ulama disebut sebagai zawu al-arham dan mereka tidak membedakan antara jenis saudara
BATAS HAK SUAMI DALAM ‎MEMPERLAKUKAN ISTRI SAAT NUSYUZ ‎DAN SANKSI PIDANANYA ‎ saoki saoki
AL-HUKAMA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016): Desember 2016
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (479.997 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/al-hukama.2016.6.2.251-274

Abstract

Abstract: This study wants to answer two problems: first, the limit where the husband’s rights treat his nuzuz wife; and second, the provision of criminal sanction for the husband who goes beyond the limit of such rights. This research uses the normative research approach. Hopefully, through this approach it can be seen the limit of the husband’s rights in threatening his nuzuz wife and the criminal sanction for the husband who goes beyond the limit of such rights. The result of the research concludes that Islam gives the boundary to the husband’s rights toward his nuzuz wife: first, the persuasive right and physical sanction through the media of mentoring. The next step is through ‘bed separation’ and then physical sanction in the way of beating that does not hurt and injure; second, the right not to give the maintenance; and third is a divorce right. The husband’s action in implementing his rights that exceeds the limit of physical sanctions such as physical violence to hurt, injure, and harm, or psychological violence such as intimidation that causes severe trauma, according to KUHP and Undang-Undang no. 24 tahun 2004, can be subject to criminal sanction. Abstrak: Studi ini ingin menjawab dua permasalahan. Pertama, Sampai di mana batasan hak-hak suami dalam memperlakukan istri yang nusyuz. Kedua, bagaimana ketentuan sanksi pidana bagi suami yang melampaui batas-batas haknya tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan (teori) normatif research. Diharapkan melalui pendekatan ini dapat diketahui batasan hak-hak suami dalam memperlakukan istri yang nusyuz dan sanksi pidana bagi suami yang melampaui batas-batas haknya. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Islam memberi batasan hak suami pada istri yang sedang nusyuz; pertama, hak persuasif dan sanksi fisik melalui tahapan pemberian nasehat, lalu tahap berikutnya melalui pisah ranjang, lalu kemudian sanksi fisik melalui cara memukul yang tidak sampai menyakiti bahkan mencederai atau melukai,  yang bersifat mendidik dan memberi pelajaran. Kedua, hak tidak memberi nafkah, dan ketiga hak talak. Tindakan suami dalam menggunakan hak sanksi fisik yang melebihi batas seperti adanya kekerasan fisik yang menyakiti, melukai atau mencederai, atau kekerasan psikis seperti intimidasi yang menimbulkan trauma berat, menurut KUHP dan UU No. 23 Tahun 2004, tindakan suami tersebut dapat dikenai sanksi pidana.  Kata Kunci: Hak suami, nusyuz, dan sanksi pidana
Aktualisasi Makna Jihad dalam Kehidupan Modern Saoki Saoki
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2013): April 2013
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (716.859 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2013.3.1.1-18

Abstract

This article discusses about the essence of the meaning of jihad and its actualization in a modern life. Basically, jihad has two meanings; First, the notion of the propagation of Islam in a polite, tolerant, peaceful way, and away from coercion and violence. Second, the notion of war. Jihad in the first sense to be applied anytime and anywhere, while the second one should only be applied in a very constrained condition because of the definite threat of the enemy. The main purpose of jihad is al-amr bi al-ma'ruf wa al-nahy an al-munkar. Therefore, in today’s modern context, jihad could be interpreted in a more macro and holistic sense, so that any forms of al-amr bi al-ma'ruf wa al-nahy an al-munkar like an attempt to increase the level of education of Muslims, an attempt to increase the welfare of the Muslims weather economically, politically, and culturally. All are included in a category of jihad in Islam, and they are more important than a physical jihad with a war, due to the current context, jihad with those meanings are the most needed by Muslims.
Islam dan Negara Menurut M. Natsir dan Abdurrahman Wahid Saoki Saoki
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 4 No. 02 (2014): Oktober 2014
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (639.368 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2014.4.02.344-367

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses M. Natsirs and Abdurrahman Wahids thought about the relationship between Islam and state. Both of M. Natsir and Abdurrahman Wahid agree that the most realistic system to be applied in Indonesia is a democratic system. They also agree that there is no a rigid political system in Islam as it has existed today. In addition, Islam provides the basic principles of the nation and state namely deliberation, justice, equality, freedom, and togetherness. The fundamental difference between M. Natsirs and Gus Durs thought in viewing the relationship between Islam and state is about the two things: first, their respond to secularism, which tries to separate between religion and state; and second, their political thought in addressing democracy and the Pancasila ideology as the fundamental principles of Indonesia. Keywords: Islam, state, M. Natsir, Abdurrahman Wahid.