Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Muhammad Alpi Syahrin
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE LEGAL TRADITION IN INDONESIA: FINDING THE MIDDLE WAY Maghfirah Maghfirah; Zulkifli Zulkifli; Muhammad Alpi Syahrin; Aslati Aslati
Sosiohumaniora Vol 24, No 1 (2022): Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, MARCH 2022
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i1.35341

Abstract

Community life continues to develop dynamically. Along with that, various demands emerged to make various changes towards the achievement of national goals. Changes to the framework of the national legal system that was built on the basis of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The direction of development must take into account the plurality of society without limiting rights and giving respect to the implementation of the law without overriding other legal interests. The context of a pluralistic Indonesian society develops along with the dynamics and development of society, both socio-culturally and politically. This article discusses the legal tradition that grows and takes root in Indonesia. This article is a normative research, which is conducting a literature study or secondary data to collect data through documentation from various articles, books, and other sources that discuss legal traditions in Indonesia. The finding of this article is that legal practices that develop in Indonesia are customary law, Islamic law, and Continental Europe. In the development of national law through the “middle way” as a principle of compromise against legal traditions that influence and attract each other, taking into account the philosophical, sociological, and juridical. In essence, legal practice refers to welfare and benefit considerations: “maintaining old traditions that are still relevant, building new, better traditions.” What this article has in common with others is that it discusses legal traditions, while the difference is that this article analyzes the development of legal practice in Indonesia from various perspectives and approaches to religious values so as to create a just legal concept.
UPAYA MENEMUKAN KONSEP IDEAL TENTANG FUNGSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI muhammad alpi syahrin; Jufri hardianto zulfan; Mhd. Kastulani
Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri sultan syarif kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v1i2.8314

Abstract

AbstrackThe constitutional court in Indonesia was formed to strengthen the guard against democratic development which is expected to transition smoothly and achieve a new democratic national life and relizes the rule of law, because historically the idea of establishing a Constitutional Court by PAH 1 BP MPR  was to go through a transition from an authoritatian regime to an era of democracy. The Constitutional Court is actually not an institution that “menoton” as the guardian of the constitution but must also be able to provide decisions which are certainly the result of the interpretation of the Constitution Court judges who not only issue decisions based on the text alone but the Constitution Court must look at the context that occurs in the mindst of society, so with that the Constitutional Court’s decision was not only oriented to the principle of legal certainty but more than that, namely the principke of legal usefulness. Because the use of the law in the results of decisions of the constitutional institution will be more expected by the public by remembering that the court is a judicial institution whose decisions are binding and final. AbstrakMahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia dibentuk untuk memperkuat pengawalan terhadap perkembangan demokrasi sehingga diharapkan masa transisi dapat dilalui dengan lancar dan tercapai kehidupan nasional baru yang demokratis dan terwujudnya supremasi hukum, karena sejarahnya gagasan pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh PAH I BP MPR untuk melalui masa transisi dari rezim otoriter menuju era demokrasi. Mahkamah Konstitusi sebenarnya bukan lembaga negara yang hanya “menoton” sebagai pengawal konstitusi (the guardian of the constitution) tetapi juga harus mampu memberikan putusan-putusan yang tentunya merupakan hasil dari penafsiran hakim MK yang bukan hanya mengeluarkan keputusan berdasarkan kondisi yang terdapat didalam teks saja melainkan MK harus melihat konteks yang terjadi di tengah-tengah masyarakat, sehingga dengan hal tersebut putusan yang dibuat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi bukan hanya berorientasi asas kepastian hukum tetapi lebih dari itu yaitu asas kemamfaatan hukum. karena kemamfaatan hukum dalam hal hasil keputusan dari lembaga Mahkamah Konstitusi akan lebih diharapkan oleh masyarakat dengan mengingat bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan lembaga peradilan yang keputusanya bersifat mengikat dan final.
Co-Authors Aslati Aslati Jufri hardianto zulfan Maghfirah Maghfirah Mhd. Kastulani Zulkifli Zulkifli