Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 312 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN TERKAIT PERKARA KORBAN TABRAK LARI (Studi di Unit Laka Satuan Lalu Lintas Kepolisian Resort Kabupaten Malang). Muhammad Firmansyah Nasution
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2019
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Muhammad Firmansyah Nasution, Dr. Ismail Navianto, S.H., MH., Ardi Ferdian, S.H., M.Kn. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya firmansyahhangat@gmail.com ABSTRAK Implementasi Kepolisian dalam proses penindakan hingga pengungkapan kasus kecelakaan tabrak lari di Kabupaten Malang, serta menunjukan bahwa kegiatan-kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh anggota unit idik laka terkait penerapannya terkadang ada kendala Dalam kasus kecelakaan lalu lintas sendiri juga sering terjadinya kendala terhadap cara pengungkapannya yang dimana langkah dari pihak kepolisian nanti akan membuat surat SP2HP (Surat Pemberitahuan Hasil Penyelidikan) dikarenakan alat bukti dalam mengungkap kasus tabrak lari sendiri minim atau tidak cukup sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. yang mengakibatkan kasus kecelakaan tabrak lari sendiri masih sulit untuk diungkap. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dapat ditemukan adalah masih kurangnya kegiatan-kegiatan dari anggota unit idik laka dalam mengungkap kasus tabrak lari yang mengakibatkan kasus-kasus kecelakaan lalu lintas tabrak lari masih sulit dalam penyelesaiannya. Jenis penelitian hukum ini adalah empiris yang menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Berdasarkan pembahasan, maka dapat disimpulkan: 1) penerapan pada pasal 312 tidak mampu diaplikasikan secara benar dan berkesinambungan. 2)  Kendala kepolisian dalam menerapkan pasal 312 terkait tabrak lari kurangnya pihak penyidik dalam memahami aturan-aturan yang berlaku serta kurangnya kesadaran dan pengetahuan masyarakat tentang arti penyidikan pada kasus tabrak lari. Kata Kunci : Implementasi, Pasal 312, Perkara Korban, Tabrak Lari.   ABSTRACT This research is aimed to observe further the implementation of the process that takes place following hit- and-run accident in the Regency of Malang. There are still several hindrances faced by the members of enquiry unit of road accident especially related to the road accident cases in terms of enquiry into the     case. In this case, the police will issue notice of progress of investigation since the evidence in hit-and-run   is considered insufficient and does not meet corroboration criterion, leading to unsettled hit-and-run case. This research was conducted based on socio-juridical method. Based on the discussion, the research  results conclude: 1) Article 312 is not appropriately implemented, 2) the hindrances are caused by the lack  of understanding from enquirers about applying rules and lack of awareness and the knowledge of the people concerning enquiry in hit-and-run cases. Keywords: implementation, Article 312, case of the victim, hit-and-run
PKPU Moratory As a Form of Proof of Failure to Pay Ratibulava Ratibulava; Steppanus Meky Cresiawan; Muhammad Firmansyah Nasution
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6090

Abstract

The most appropriate Debt Moratorium at this time is the Bankruptcy mechanism and PKPU, by looking at the good faith of the Debtor, then the creditor can estimate that the debtor is able to pay its obligations by postponing / moratorium on the debt as outlined in the peace plan. The idea of a bankruptcy moratorium and PKPU started from the increase in cases registered in commercial courts and other economic impacts, so it can actually be said that a moratorium is not the right solution. Reviewing the discussion of the moratorium can be done if there is uncertainty in the situation and if the moratorium is carried out it will bring goodness and order to all parties. The moratorium on bankruptcy cases and PKPU is not an effective solution, considering that the bankruptcy institution and PKPU were born from Law Number 37/2004. This means that the idea of a moratorium must go through a legislative process so that it can be in sync with Law No. 37/2004. This mechanism is not easy and will take a long time so that the idea of a moratorium is technically a law and regulation. Likewise, technically judicial, the moratorium idea is related to the limitation of the competence of the commercial court so that it is necessary to synchronize the legislative and judicial functions, if implemented it will cause many problems so that it will be more effective and efficient to revise Law No. Compared to a moratorium on bankruptcy and PKPU cases, revising the two regulations will be more effective in resolving the negative impacts that arise in connection with bankruptcy and PKPU cases in commercial courts.