Anton Hendrik Samudra
Faculty Of Law, University Of Surabaya

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Kewenangan Penyidik Menetapkan Rehabilitasi Tanpa Penetapan Pengadilan pada Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Reza Setyawan; Anton Hendrik Samudra
JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol. 22 No. 01 (2019): Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (271.594 KB) | DOI: 10.24123/yustika.v22i01.2029

Abstract

This article reviews criminal justice process in deterring drug abuse case, discussing rehabilitation as a part of criminal sanction and the implementation or existence without court ruling or decision. Several rules and regulations discussed in resolving this matter include Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Government Regulation Number 25 of 2011 concerning Mandatory Implementation of Narcotics Addict Report. The article was a part of bachelor’s degree thesis, conducted using normative legal study with case approach method. The case discussed is about rehabilitation of drug abuser Without Court’s order. The research finding is investigator do not have authority to place the drug abuser under rehabilitation. It is supposedly by court’s order.
Modus Operandi dan Problematika Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring Anton Hendrik Samudra
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 31, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (634.548 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.34786

Abstract

AbstractOnline fraud experienced by the society in general perspective, and the East Java community in particular. The victimVictims hope is hoping that the perpetrator can be arrested, and the victim's loss got returned. Beside the technical constraints faced by law enforcement regarding privacy and data security regimes that also protect perpetrators, there is also problem in the rule of law. The norm specifically regulated in Article 28 paragraph (1) Law 11 of 2008 on Electronic Transaction Information (UU ITE) has a special restriction because of its consumer protection dimension. This article is a result of a research conducted regarding the profile of the modus operandi of online fraud in East Java and outlining the emerging legal problems. The research method used is juridical empiric and juridical normative, empiric juridical used to gather data, whereas juridical normative by literature study. The research findings are: it is necessity to reformulate the norms related to online fraud in the ITE Law because in its modus, there are cases of online fraud which not covered by Article 28 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law. IntisariTindak pidana penipuan daring cukup banyak dialami masyarakat pada umumnya, dan masyarakat Jawa Timur pada khususnya. Korban sangat berharap pelakunya dapat ditangkap kemudian uang atau kerugian korban dikembalikan. Selain kendala teknis yang dialami penegak hukum dalam rezim privasi dan keamanan data yang juga melindungi pelaku, juga terdapat problematika dalam pengaturan norma hukum. Norma yang diatur secara khusus dalam Pasal 28 ayat (1) UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) memiliki batasan khusus karena dimensi perlindungan konsumennya. Tulisan berikut ini merupakan hasil penelitian tentang profil modus operandi tindak pidana penipuan daring di Jawa Timur, penormaannya terkait tindak pidana tersebut dan menguraikan problematika hukum yang muncul. Metode penelitan yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dan yuridis normatif, yuridis empiris dilakukan dengan pengambilan dan pengolahan data sedangkan yuridis normatif dengan cara studi kepustakaan. Temuan penelitian adalah perlunya reformulasi norma terkait penipuan daring dalam UU ITE karena dalam profil modusnya terdapat kasus penipuan daring yang tidak tercakup dalam Pasal 28 ayat (1) UU ITE.
How Far the Authorities are Going to go on Tackling Political Motive Hoax Spreading Anton Hendrik Samudra
Kertha Patrika Vol 43 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2021.v43.i01.p02

Abstract

This paper identifies hoax as a cyberspace social problem which can have a negative impact toward public order, both in cyberspace and real life. It also elaborates how a hoax is different from fake news for its characteristic. A hoax could cause horizontal conflict, especially in Indonesia when it is about the most recent common political commodities, which are race, ethnicity, religion, intergroup (SARA). Every government has interest on maintaining public order to keep the sustainability of society. Criminal law is designed to be the ultimate tool of social engineering through deterrence effect. The problem is how far the law enforcement is going to go to eradicate the hoax spreading, because the issues of freedom of speech/information.The research is conducted by using a conceptual approach in a normative legal study. Secondary data also provided in this paper to grasp the factual problems as the threat that needed to be encountered. The first part of the paper elaborates the freedom of speech/information, cyberspace, and social media. The second part is explanation of profile of hoax in Indonesia. The third part is elaboration of criminal statutes of hoax distribution using information communication technology. The last part is on how far the government and law enforcement synergize and how far they going to go in handling hoaxes and the sources to prevent and contain further damage. The findings are the blocking and taking down is not just about depraving internet user’s rights, but balancing between the freedom and public order. In order to be justifiable and balanced, the government needs to consider objectively whether the content was a threat that disrupting public order (moreover, national security), while the law enforcement could confiscate the electronic system involved and it should have been through appropriate criminal procedure.
Modus Operandi dan Problematika Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring Anton Hendrik Samudra
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 31, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (634.548 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.34786

Abstract

AbstractOnline fraud experienced by the society in general perspective, and the East Java community in particular. The victimVictims hope is hoping that the perpetrator can be arrested, and the victim's loss got returned. Beside the technical constraints faced by law enforcement regarding privacy and data security regimes that also protect perpetrators, there is also problem in the rule of law. The norm specifically regulated in Article 28 paragraph (1) Law 11 of 2008 on Electronic Transaction Information (UU ITE) has a special restriction because of its consumer protection dimension. This article is a result of a research conducted regarding the profile of the modus operandi of online fraud in East Java and outlining the emerging legal problems. The research method used is juridical empiric and juridical normative, empiric juridical used to gather data, whereas juridical normative by literature study. The research findings are: it is necessity to reformulate the norms related to online fraud in the ITE Law because in its modus, there are cases of online fraud which not covered by Article 28 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law. IntisariTindak pidana penipuan daring cukup banyak dialami masyarakat pada umumnya, dan masyarakat Jawa Timur pada khususnya. Korban sangat berharap pelakunya dapat ditangkap kemudian uang atau kerugian korban dikembalikan. Selain kendala teknis yang dialami penegak hukum dalam rezim privasi dan keamanan data yang juga melindungi pelaku, juga terdapat problematika dalam pengaturan norma hukum. Norma yang diatur secara khusus dalam Pasal 28 ayat (1) UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) memiliki batasan khusus karena dimensi perlindungan konsumennya. Tulisan berikut ini merupakan hasil penelitian tentang profil modus operandi tindak pidana penipuan daring di Jawa Timur, penormaannya terkait tindak pidana tersebut dan menguraikan problematika hukum yang muncul. Metode penelitan yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dan yuridis normatif, yuridis empiris dilakukan dengan pengambilan dan pengolahan data sedangkan yuridis normatif dengan cara studi kepustakaan. Temuan penelitian adalah perlunya reformulasi norma terkait penipuan daring dalam UU ITE karena dalam profil modusnya terdapat kasus penipuan daring yang tidak tercakup dalam Pasal 28 ayat (1) UU ITE.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PENYIMPANAN BAHAN BAKAR MINYAK NON SUBSIDI TANPA IZIN OLEH HP BERDASARKAN AJARAN KONKURSUS DITINJAU DARI KUHP DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI Chyntia Bella Yudi R.S.; Taufik Iman Santosa; Anton Hendrik Samudra
CALYPTRA Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (Maret)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan Penulisan jurnal ilmiah ini adalah sebagai suatu syarat untuk kelulusan dan mendapatkan gelar Sarjana Hukum di Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya. Tujuan Praktis dari penulisan skripsi ini untuk dapat mengetahui apakah HP dapat dikenakan pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan ajaran konkursus atas tindakan penyimpanan Bahan Bakar Minyak non subsidi tanpa izin ditinjau dari KUHP dan UU No. 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi. perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh HP perihal penyimpanan bahan bakar minyak jenis pertamax, dapat dikenakan pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan Pasal 53 huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi. Perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh HP telah memenuhi keseluruhan unsur pertanggungjawaban pidana. Perbuatan HP telah memenuhi keseluruhan unsur sebagaimana Pasal 53 huruf c UU No. 22 Tahun 2001, yaitu melakukan penyimpanan bahan bakar minyak jenis pertamax tanpa memiliki izin usaha penyimpanan dari pihak yang berwenang. Perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh HP memenuhi kedua unsur Pasal 480 KUHP dan Pasal 53 huruf c UU No. 22 Tahun 2001, berdasarkan konkursus idealis sebagaimana Pasal 63 ayat (1) KUHP, maka perbuatan yang dilakukan HP dapat dijatuhkan hanya satu pidana pokok terberat. Sehingga HP dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana sebagaimana Pasal 53 huruf c UU No. 22 Tahun 2001 dan dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana penjara paling lama 3 (tiga) tahun dan denda paling tinggi Rp 30.000.000.000,00 (tiga puluh miliar rupiah).
Transaksi Fiktif Melalui Marketplace Daring Memanfaatkan Promo Cashback Christian Tarapul Anjur Hasiholan; Anton Hendrik Samudra
JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol. 23 No. 02 (2020): Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/yustika.v23i02.3066

Abstract

The present development of technology, mainly with the presence of internet has presented new ways and opportunities in business, namely by electronic commerce (e-commerce). Despite having positive impact, e-commerce also has the potential to cause a negative impact, that is by cyber crime. This research is intended to analyse the possibility of a new cyber crime mode which utilizes cashback promotion in e-marketplace (mainly known as marketplace). The mode used by the perpetrators is to make fictitious transaction in order for the system of marketplace to provide many cashback promos for each transaction made. The perpetrators are allowed to do this mode because they take advantage of the flaw in the system of the marketplace due to the availability of the cashback promo for all of the consumer. The emergence of the possibility of a new cyber crime mode shows the importance of this case to be assessed based on The Law of Republic Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 Concerning Amandment to The Law of Republic Indonesia Number 11 Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions when a transaction is considered as manipulative.
SCREENSHOT FACEBOOK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA PENCIPTAAN INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK PALSU Clarisa Permata Hariono Putri; Hwian Christianto; Anton Hendrik Samudra
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (233.131 KB) | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p161-178

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pembuktian tindak pidana penciptaan informasi elektronik palsu menggunakan screenshot facebook sebagai alat bukti berdasarkan Undang – Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dan perubahannya, serta peraturan terkait dengan melihat pada kasus yang ada dalam putusan No. 43/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Mjl. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif yaitu suatu metode penelitian yang dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah screenshot facebook tidak cukup untuk dapat digunakan sebagai alat bukti tindak pidana penciptaan informasi elektronik palsu karena masih diragukan keabsahannya secara materiil sebagai alat bukti dan penerapannya sebagai alat bukti masih kurang memenuhi dan membuktikan tiap unsur tindak pidana penciptaan informasi elektronik palsu, sehingga perlu digunakan alat bukti lain dalam mekanisme pembuktian tindak pidana penciptaan informasi elektronik palsu dan perlunya diadakan pengaturan penyitaan atas akun.