Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.642
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan community: Pengawas Dinamika Sosial DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Public Policy Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Teuku Ahmad Yani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implementasi Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Aceh Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 Husni Jalil; Teuku Ahmad Yani; Mohd. Daud Yoesoef
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 2, (Agustus, 2010)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research is to investigate and evaluate the implementation of special autonomy as it is regulated in the act No. 11, 2006 on the Government of Aceh. Data far this research was gathered by library resources, such as primary, second, tertiary law resources. Field study by interviewing some parties who were related this research was done in order to support secondary resources. The research findings show that the special autonomy in Aceh did not effectively implementation yet, this factor was caused by procedures of implementation (peraturan pelaksanaan) was not fulfilled by the center government. Special Autonomy Implementation in Province Aceh based on the act Number 11 of 2006
Mewujudkan Keharmonisan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas dalam Pendirian Perseroan Daerah Teuku Ahmad Yani; Teuku Muttaqin Mansur
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 22, No 2 (2020): Vol. 22, No. 2, Agustus 2020
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v22i2.16184

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis asas lex spesialis terkait dengan keharmonis-an Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas dalam Pendirian Perseroan Daerah. Perusahaan perseroan daerah merupakan salah satu badan usaha dari sejumlah badan usaha yang dikenal dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia. Ciri khas hukum perusahaan di Indonesia, masing-masing jenis perusahaan diatur dengan undang-undang yang terpisah. BUMD diatur dengan Undang-Undang Pemerintah Daerah, sedangkan perseroan terbatas diatur dengan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuri-dis normatif, dengan mendalami upaya harmonisasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjuk-kan bahwa perseroan daerah pada dasarnya juga perseroan terbatas yang dapat dimiliki sepenuh sahamnya oleh satu pemerintah daerah, namun dalam UUPT, tidak diakomodir sebagai perseroan terbatas dengan saham tunggal dapat didirikan oleh satu pemerintah daerah. Namun dalam praktiknya sebagian notaris berupaya melakukan terobosan yang kemudian diakui oleh pemerintah dengan memberikan status badan hukum pada perseroan yang didirikan sepenuhnya oleh satu pemerintah daerah sebagai satunya pendirinya Perseroda. Hal ini, menimbulkan pertanyaan hukum, apakah landasan hukum yang dapat digunakan oleh notaris dan pemerintah untuk menerobos UUPT untuk memenuhi kaedah yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Pemda. Bringing the Harmony of the Limited Liability Law in the Establishment of Regional Company The purpose of this study is to analyze the lex specialist principle related to the harmony of the Law on Limited Liability Companies in the establishment of regional companies. Regional company is one of business entities in Indonesia legal system. The characteristic of company law in Indonesia is each type of company regulated by a separate law. BUMD (regional company) is regulated by the regional government law while limited liability company is regulated by UUPT. This study uses a normative juridical method, by exploring efforts to harmonize the law. The results showed that the regional company is basically also a limited liability company that can be fully owned by regional government, but based on the company law, it is not accommodated as a limited liability company because the company has only a single share which is one local government. However, in practice some of notaries tried to make a breakthrough which was later recognized by the government by giving legal status to regional company. This raises the question of what legal basis can be used by notaries and the government to break through the company law so that it meets the methods contained in the regional government law.
Identifikasi Qanun Aceh dalam Upaya Menumbuhkan Iklim Usaha Menuju Demokrasi Ekonomi Berdasarkan UUD Tahun 1945 Eddy Purnama; Teuku Ahmad Yani; Saiful Bahri
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 2, (Agustus, 2010)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research to present whether economic democration as Stated in the 1945 Constotution, Article 33, has been able to be operationalized in to the Qanuns of Aceh for developing production athmosphir. This research refers secondary data, such as primary, secondary, tertiary resources. However emperical data was also used for quiding analysis of the research. Research finding shows that the effort of developing production athmosphir in case of the special authonomy in Aceh through regional and procedures regulation was not effectively achieved. This was indicated by unability of Aceh Government in constructing legislations product either for implementing obligation affairs or section of choices as there were mentioned in law Number 11, 2006 on Government of Aceh. Besides, effort of making debeaurocratization in permit services, it was not regulated yet in Qanun of Aceh. Identification for Qanun of Aceh in Developing Production Athmosphir Toward Economic Democration Based on 1945 Constitution
Pengaturan Hukum Perlindungan Nelayan Kecil Teuku Muttaqin Mansur; Muazzin Muazzin; Teuku Ahmad Yani; Sulaiman Sulaiman
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 19, No 3 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 3, (Desember, 2017)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 7/2016 tentang Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Nelayan, Pembudidayaan dan Petambak Garam, memunculkan masalah baru bagi nelayan kecil. Undang-undang ini memperbesar ukuran gross tonnage kapal nelayan kecil dari ukuran 5 GT menjadi 10 GT. Ketentuan ukuran 5 GT diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 45/2009 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang No. 31/2004 tentang Perikanan. Perubahan GT tersebut tidak sederhana. Masalah utama adalah terdapat perbedaan antara undang-undang yang mengatur perlindungan nelayan dengan undang-undang yang mengatur perikanan. Implikasi dari perbedaan ini tidak terbatas pada kapal semata, melainkan pada jalur penangkapan ikan, fishing ground, hingga proses perizinan kapal. Dengan semakin besar GT, maka fishing ground yang selama ini dipakai oleh kapal nelayan ukuran 5 GT, turut dipakai oleh kapal berukuran 10 GT. Hal ini berpotensi konflik sesama nelayan. Tawaran pemetaan untuk harmonisasi hukum diharapkan akan menjawab permasalahan hukum perlindungan nelayan. Legal Arrangement of Small Fishermen Protection The birth of the Act No. 7/2016 on Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Cultivation and Fishers of Salt, raises new problems for small fishermen. This act enlarges the gross tonnage size of small fishing vessels from 5 GT to 10 GT. The 5 GT size requirement is regulated in the Act No. 45/2009 on Amendment of the Act No. 31/2004 on Fisheries. The GT changes are not simple. The main problem is that there are differences between laws governing the protection of fishermen and the laws governing fisheries. The implications of this difference are not limited to ships alone, but to fishing lanes, fishing ground, to the licensing process of ships. With the bigger GT, then the fishing ground that has been used by fishing boats size 5 GT, also used by the ship size of 10 GT. This has the potential to conflict among fellow fishermen. The legal to harmonization mapping offer is expected to address legal protection issues of fishermen.
CHANGE OF BUSINESS ENTITY TO THE EXISTENCE OF BUSINESS LICENSE IN REALIZING LEGAL GUARANTEE AND EASY BUSINESS IN INDONESIA. Teuku Ahmad Yani; Azhari Yahya; Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 24, No 1 (2022): Vol. 24, No. 1, April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v24i1.27507

Abstract

The laws and regulations in Indonesia recognize various legal forms of companies; however, the legal form of a Limited Liability Company is considered to have better business prospects. Limited Liability Company also becomes a legal form of a company that can conduct business in all business fields. This condition has led to the practice of changing the legal form of companies in Indonesia from companies with certain legal forms to the legal form of Limited Liability Companies. This change in the legal form of the company is not covered by a special law that can combine the needs of changing the legal form of the company. In practice, this change in legal form is carried out in various ways that may result in legal uncertainty on one hand, and licensing difficulties as a result of a change in legal form on the other hand. Therefore, a new concept that can create legal certainty and ease doing of business in changing the legal form of companies in Indonesia is needed.
Co-Authors Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Azhari Yahya Eddy Purnama Husni Jalil I Nyoman Sujana Izra Fadiya Mohd. Daud Yoesoef Muazzin Muazzin Muhammad Haikal Natasya Aziza Suhar Saiful Bahri Sulaiman Sulaiman Sulaiman, Sulaiman Syarifah Fitri Sarah T Musahiddinsyah Teuku Muttaqin Mansur Teuku Muttaqin Mansur Yusri Yusri