Mutiara Girindra Pratiwi
Universitas Tarumanagara

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Gender Equality Issues in Optical Feminist Jurisprudence and Implementation in Indonesian Heri Setiawan; Steven Ouddy; Mutiara Girindra Pratiwi
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no4.1386

Abstract

Gender meaning of fundamentally different from biological sex. Biological sex is a gift; we are born as a man or a woman. However, the path that makes us masculine or feminine is a combination of the building blocks of basic biological and biological interpretation by our culture. From the tiny baby to reach old age, we learn and practice specific ways that have been determined by the community for us to be men and women. Gender is a set of roles as well as costumes and masks at the theater, convey to others that we are feminine or masculine. Device specific behaviors include appearance, dress, attitude, personality, work inside and outside the household, sexuality, family responsibilities and so together polish "gender roles" us. If someone mentions or asks about gender, then what is meant is gender in the context of language approach. This term became very commonly used in the last few decades. Feminist jurisprudence is a legal philosophy that is based on gender equality in politics, economic and social. Feminist jurisprudence unpacks and explain how the law plays a role to legalize the status of women in subordination to men, in other words, the law as a means to preserve the status quo, namely the dominance of men over women. Moreover, feminist jurisprudence is also trying to make a change/transformation changing the status of women by changing laws and its approach and its stance on gender cases be more fair and balanced. This is an emancipatory project woman in law. Keywords: Gender; Feminist Jurisprudence; justice; men and women.
Usaha Pemerintah Melindungi Hak Imunitas Advokat Dalam Melakukan Pekerjaan Cinthia Wijaya; John Calvin; Mutiara Girindra Pratiwi
RESAM Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2019): RESAM Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : RESAM Jurnal Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1787.012 KB) | DOI: 10.32661/resam.v5i1.16

Abstract

AbstrakHak Imunitas Advokat menjadi tolak ukur bagi seorang Advokat dalam melaksanakan tugasnya sesuai kuasa yang diberikan klien dalam pembelaan hukum dalam kasus yang ditangani, sebagaiaman diatur dalam Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui usaha pemerintah melindungi hak imunitas advokat dalam melakukan pekerjaan. Pendekatan penelitian ini yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder atau data pustaka (library research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Hak imunitas sangat penting bagi advokat dalam menjalankan fungsi dan tugasnya sebagai aparat penegak hukum demi terciptanya keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan. Dengan demikian, hak imunitas advokat bukan hanya diberikan dalam sidang pengadilan, tapi berlaku juga di luar persidangan dengan catatan bahwa di luar persidangan tersebut merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari proses peradilan.AbstractThe Advocate's Immunity Rights is a benchmark for an Advocate in carrying out his duties by the authority granted by the client in a legal defense in the case handled, as stipulated in Article 16 of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Lawyers. The purpose of this study is to determine the government's efforts to protect the rights of immunity of advocates in carrying out work. This research approach is normative juridical by using secondary data or library data. The results of the study indicate that the right to immunity is very important for advocates in carrying out their functions and duties as law enforcement officers to create justice, certainty, and expediency. As such, the rights of the immunity of advocates are not only given in court proceedings but also apply outside the trial provided that outside the trial is an integral part of the judicial process.