Puguh Priyo Widodo
Master Of Hospital Management Faculty Of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALYSIS OF SECTIO CAESAREA UNIT COST AS A BASIS TO RECOMMEND THE PRICE Puguh Priyo Widodo; Tatong Hariyanto; Ali Djamhuri
Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Vol 15, No 4 (2017)
Publisher : Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.275 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jam2017.015.04.02

Abstract

This research aims to know the amount of Sectio Caesarea unit cost as a basis to recommend the price. Beside that this research also aims to know cost component which influences Sectio Caesarea unit cost and to know factoHospital that can influence counting Sectio Caesarea unit cost in the hospital. The method used in this research is Operational research and this research is descriptive with an approach to quantitative and qualitative data. Unit cost calculation using real cost method. The results show that Sectio Caesarea unit cost as a basis to recommend the price of Rp. 7,687,231.03. Hospital costs currently only reach CRR 102.86%. The proposed price of Section Caesarea amounted to Rp. 7,878,000.00. Cost components that affect the unit cost are direct costs, indirect costs, and utilization. FactoHospital affecting the calculation of the unit cost include never done a cost analysis, incomplete data, human resource capability, knowledge of human resources, and lack of skills of human resources. From these results Need to do a cost analysis, revamping financial statements, and equipment inventory.
Evaluasi Implementasi JKN pada Studi Kasus Layanan Operasi Caesar Di Provinsi Jawa Timur (Evaluation of the JKN program implementation: a case study of sectio caesarean in East Java Province, Indonesia) Edit Oktavia Manuama; Puguh Priyo Widodo; Yennike Tri Herawati; Ni’mal Baroya; Muhammad Faozi Kurniawan
Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia Vol 10, No 3 (2021): Special Issues
Publisher : Center for Health Policy and Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkki.67088

Abstract

Tingginya pembiayaan untuk prosedur layanan kesehatan tertentu termasuk operasi seksio menjadi ditengarai menjadi penyebab defisit anggaran JKN pada periode 2015 - 2020. Selain itu, berbagai studi menemukan bahwa adanya pemanfaatan layanan operasi caesar yang tidak perlu pada kelompok tertentu, sekaligus tidak tersedianya akses ke pelayanan operasi caesar pada kelompok masyarakat lainnya. Dengan menggunakan studi kasus layanan operasi seksio di Jawa Timur, penelitian ini mengkaji aspek ekuitas dari implementasi JKN. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan menganalisis data survei Pemerintah (SUSENAS dan RISKESDAS) serta data sampel BPJS 2015 – 2018. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan disajikan dalam bentuk proporsi dan absolut. Studi ini memberikan gambaran bahwa telah terjadi ketimpangan utilisasi layanan operasi caesar berdasarkan segmen kepesertaan di mana 86% pelayanan operasi caesar dinikmati oleh segmen kepesertaan PPU dan PBPU dibandingkan dengan segmen sasaran utama program JKN yaitu segmen PBI. Selain itu, layanan dokter spesialis kebidanan dan kandungan hanya terkonsentasi di wilayah kotamadya di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Sistem single pool dan belum optimalnya tanggung jawab pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah dalam pemerataan fasilitas kesehatan di Jawa Timur telah menjadikan masyarakat miskin Jawa Timur justru mensuplai golongan yang mungkin tidak perlu mendapatkan bantuan akses ke layanan kesehatan, termasuk layanan operasi caesar. The increasing trend in section caesarean procedure has been associated with the deficit of health insurance program in Indonesia. Previous studies highlighted that both underutilisation and overutilisation of SC procedure are present.  Using SC as a case study, this research analyzes the equity of the implementation of the Indonesia Health Insurance Program, namely JKN. This study used a quantitative approach to analyse the government survey ( SUSENAS and RISKESDAS) and the data sample of BPJS. This study provides an inequity in SC services where 86% of the SC procedure were used by the secondary target of the NHI program, PPU and PBPU group compared to the targeted group, the PBI. Besides, there is a gap in the distribution of the obstetric gynaecologists, where most of the doctors are in the city. To conclude, the existing single pool system and suboptimal role of national and local government to provide more equitable access to health facility have widen the inequality as currently the poor is supplying the wealthier groups, including access to SC procedure.