Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal U-JET: Unila Journal of English Teaching Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature
Nabila Ayu Nisa
University of Lampung
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Comparative Study between Reflectivity and Impulsivity Cognitive Style in Using Learning Strategy in Reading and Reading Comprehension Nabila Ayu Nisa; Bambang Setiyadi; Huzairin Huzairin
U-JET Vol 7, No 3 (2018): U-JET
Publisher : FKIP UNILA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.441 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Kelompok mana antara murid yang reflektif atau impulsif yang lebih baik dalam pemahaman membaca dan apakah ada perbedaan yang significant  antara kedua kelompok murid saat menggukan strategi belajar untuk membaca. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah Matching Failiar Figure Test (MFFT), Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ), dan tes membaca. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa siswa reflektif lebih baik dalam pemahaman membaca dibandingkan siswa impulsif. Hasilnya juga menunjukan bahwa hipotesis 2 ditolak karna tidak ada nya perbedaan yang signifikan antara siswa reflektif dan impulsif dalam menggunakan strategi belajar. Peneliti dapat menyarankan bahwa penelitian ini sangat penting untuk siswa dapat mengetahui kecenderungan strategi belajar yang mereka gunakan untuk memaksimalkan proses belajar  dalam memahami tes membaca.The aims of this study were to find out whether i) reflective or impulsive students had better comprehension in reading and ii) there was a statistically significant difference between impulsive and reflective students in using different learning strategy in reading. The instruments are Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ), and the reading comprehension test. The result showed that reflective students did better in reding comprehension than the impulsive students. It also showed that the hypothesis was rejected that there was no a statistically significant difference between reflective and impulsive students in using different learning strategy. This suggests that it is very important for the teachers to know students’ dominant learning strategies to maximize their learning process in comprehending reading test.Keywords: learning strategies, impulsivity, reflectivity, reading comprehension.
THE COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN REFLECTIVITY AND IMPULSIVITY COGNITIVE STYLE IN USING LEARNING STRATEGY IN READING AND READING COMPREHENSION Nabila Ayu Nisa; Bambang Setiyadi; Huzairin Huzairin
U-JET Vol 7, No 3 (2018): U-JET
Publisher : FKIP UNILA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.441 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Kelompok mana antara murid yang reflektif atau impulsif yang lebih baik dalam pemahaman membaca dan apakah ada perbedaan yang significant  antara kedua kelompok murid saat menggukan strategi belajar untuk membaca. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah Matching Failiar Figure Test (MFFT), Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ), dan tes membaca. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa siswa reflektif lebih baik dalam pemahaman membaca dibandingkan siswa impulsif. Hasilnya juga menunjukan bahwa hipotesis 2 ditolak karna tidak ada nya perbedaan yang signifikan antara siswa reflektif dan impulsif dalam menggunakan strategi belajar. Peneliti dapat menyarankan bahwa penelitian ini sangat penting untuk siswa dapat mengetahui kecenderungan strategi belajar yang mereka gunakan untuk memaksimalkan proses belajar  dalam memahami tes membaca.The aims of this study were to find out whether i) reflective or impulsive students had better comprehension in reading and ii) there was a statistically significant difference between impulsive and reflective students in using different learning strategy in reading. The instruments are Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ), and the reading comprehension test. The result showed that reflective students did better in reding comprehension than the impulsive students. It also showed that the hypothesis was rejected that there was no a statistically significant difference between reflective and impulsive students in using different learning strategy. This suggests that it is very important for the teachers to know students’ dominant learning strategies to maximize their learning process in comprehending reading test.Keywords: learning strategies, impulsivity, reflectivity, reading comprehension.
The use of Learning Strategy in Reading of Reflective Learners Nabila Ayu Nisa
Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): August
Publisher : CV. Tripe Konsultan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54012/jcell.v2i1.52

Abstract

The goal of this study was to see if there was a significant difference between the three types of reflective learners' reading learning strategies. The participants were 35 Senior High School students in Bandar Lampung, who were in the 12th grade. The Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) was used to categorize students into reflectivity/impulsivity, and the Language Learning Approach Questionnaire (LLSQ) was administered to determine students' learning strategy preferences. The data was analyzed using One Way ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed that reflective learners' reading strategies differed significantly from those utilized by non-reflective learners. According to the finding, Reflective learners used more metacognitive reading methods that were related to their own prior experience and knowledge.
Co-Authors Bambang Setiyadi Huzairin Huzairin