Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Edy Purnomo
university of lampung
Education

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Soft Skill Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran GGE dan TSTS Memperhatikan Motivasi Berprestasi Nurhidayani Yani; Edy Purnomo; Yon Rizal
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 9 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know the difference of soft skill and the interaction of the use of cooperative learning model of group to group exchange and two stay two stray type by considering achievement motivation. The methodology in this research was quasi experiment with comparative approach. The study design used treatment by level design. The population were 4 classes and the samples used by 2 classes in Islamic Junior high School Tias Bangun, classes was determined through random cluster sampling. Data collection technique used observationand questionnaires. Hypothesis testing using two-way analysis of variance and t-test two independent sampels. Based on data analysis, it obtained the result that there is a difference in soft skill and the interaction of the use of cooperative learning model of group to group exchange and two stay two stray write type by considering achievement motivation.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan soft skill dan interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group to group exchange dan two stray two stay dengan memperhatikan motivasi berprestasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif. Desain penelitian yang digunakan treatment by level design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 4 kelas dan sampel sebanyak 2 kelas di SMP Islam Tias Bangun yang ditentukan melalui cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui pengamatan dan angket. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis varians dua jalan dan t-tes dua sampel independen. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil bahwa ada perbedaan soft skill dan interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe gge dan tsts dengan memperhatikan motivasi berprestasi.Kata kunci: motivasi berprestasi, soft skill, group to group exchange, two stay two stray
Perbandingan Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Model Pembelajaran MEA dan RTE dengan Memperhatikan AQ Defika Putri Nastiti; Edy Purnomo; Pujiati Pujiati
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 7 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the difference of thinking ability of student analysis which learning using cooperative model type Means-Ends Analysis and Rotating Trio Exchange, and interaction to learning model by considering adversity quotient. The method research used is quasi experiment with comparative approach design by level. The population in this study is as many as 4 classes with the number of 170 students and the sample used as much as 2 classes with the number of 88 students determined through cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques through tests and questionnaires. Hypothesis testing used two way street variance analysis and two independent sample t-test. Based on the data analysis, the results obtained are: There is a difference of analytical thinking ability among students whose learning using Means-Ends Analysis learning model with Rotating Trio Exchange learning model on economic subjects, and There is an interaction between the use of learning models with adversity intelligence to the ability of analytical thinking.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis antara siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model kooperatif tipe Means-Ends Analysis dan Rotating Trio Exchange, serta interaksi antara model pembelajaran terhadap kecerdasan adversitas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif desain by level. Populasi dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 4 kelas dengan jumlah 170 siswa dan sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 2 kelas dengan jumlah 88 siswa yang ditentukan melalui cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui tes dan angket. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis varians dua jalan dan t-tes dua sampel independen. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil: Ada perbedaan kemampuan berpikir analitis antara siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model Means-Ends Analysis dengan model Rotating Trio Exchange pada mata pelajaran ekonomi, dan Ada interaksi antara penggunaan model pembelajaran dengan kecerdasan adversitas terhadap kemampuan berpikir analitis.Kata kunci: analisis, kecerdasan adversitas, mea, rte
Perbandingan Life Skills Menggunakan Model Talking Chips, Class Wide Peer Tutoring, Group Resume Sylvia Imara Nurlaela; Edy Purnomo; Tedi Rusman
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 7 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know the difference of life skills use of cooperative learning model of Talking Chips, Class Wide Peer Tutoring and Group Resume. The method used quasi experiment with comparative approach. The study design used post test only. The population this research was VII grade in SMP Negeri 1 Pesawaran and those sample from 3 classes using random Cluster Random Sampling. Data collection technique used observation. Hypothesis testing used one-way analysis of variance and countinu test t-Dunnet. Based on analysis of result data: 1. There is a difference life skills learning model Talking Chips, Class Wide Peer Tutoring and Group Resume, 2. Life skills learning model Talking Chips better than Class Wide Peer Tutoring, 3.Life skills Talking Chips learning model better than Group Resume and, 4.Life skills Class Wide Peer Tutoring learning model better than Group Resume.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan life skills penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Talking Chips, Class Wide Peer Tutoring dan Group Resume. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif. Desain penelitian yang digunakan Only One Posttest. Populasi penelitian ini siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Pesawaran dan sampel sebanyak 3 kelas menggunakan Cluster Random Sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui lembar observasi. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis varians satu jalan dan uji lanjut t-Dunnet. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil: 1. Ada perbedaan life skills antara model pembelajaran Talking Chips, Class Wide Peer Tutoring dan Group Resume, 2. Life Skills yang model pembelajaran Talking Chips lebih baik dibandingkan Class Wide Peer Tutoring, 3. Life skills yang model pembelajaran Talking Chips lebih baik dibandingkan Group Resume dan, 4. Life skills yang model pembelajaran Class Wide Peer Tutoring lebih baik dibandingkan Group Resume.Kata kunci: life skills, talking chips, class wide peer tutoring, group resume
HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI MODEL PROBING PROMPTING DAN TIME TOKEN MEMPERHATIKAN BENTUK TUGAS Hair Vanny Palla; Edy Purnomo; Yon Rizal
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 4, No 1 (2016): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know the difference of learning outcomes, the interaction of the use of cooperative learning model of Probing Prompting (PP) and Time Token (TT) type by considering the type of task. Research methodology used in this research was experiments with comparative approach. The experimental methods were divided into two, which is true experiment and quasi experiment. The methodology that was used in this research was quasi experiment. Data collection was done, by using test. The data which were collected by test of learning outcomes were analyzed by using SPSS program. Based on analysis of the data, it obtained the result that there is a difference in learning outcomes and the interaction of the use of cooperative learning model of Probing Prompting type and Time Token by considering the type of task.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar, interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Probing Prompting (PP) dan Time Token (TT) dengan memperhatikan bentuk tugas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian eksperimen dengan pendekatan komparatif. Metode eksperimen dibedakan menjadi dua, yaitu eksperimen murni (True Eksperimen) dan eksperimen semu (Quasi Eksperimen). Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode eksperimen semu (quasi eksperimen). Pengumpulan data dilakukan tes. Data yang terkumpul melalui tes hasil belajar diolah dengan program SPSS. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil bahwa ada perbedaan hasil belajar dan interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe PP dan TT dengan memperhatikan bentuk tugas.Kata kunci: hasil belajar, probing prompting, time token, tugas
HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI MODEL NHT DAN MAM DENGAN MEMPERHATIKAN SIKAP SISWA Fitma Indrawan; Edy Purnomo; Erlina Rupaidah
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 7 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of the research was to know the difference of result study, the interaction of using Numbered Heads Together learning model and Make a Match to observe students attitude. The research was done in ten class of Social Study in SMAN 1 Pagar Dewa with total population was 60 students and total of sample was 40 students. In this research, the method was used experiment method with comparative approach. The design was used treatment by level. The collected data was done by giving test and non-test. The analysis data was used analysis varian two way formula and t-test two independent samples. Based on the analysis data was gained that there were the difference between the result of Economy study in Numbered Heads Together and Make A Match, There were the interactions between using learning model and the students attitude at Economy study.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar, interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Togethers dan Make a Match dengan memperhatikan sikap siswa. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada siswa kelas kelas X IPS di SMA N Pagar Dewa dengan populasi yang berjumlah 60 siswa dan jumlah sampel sebanyak 40 siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode eksperimen dengan pendekatan komparatif. desain penelitian yang dugunakan adalah Tratment by level. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan memberikan test dan non tes. Analisis data menggunakan rumus analisis varian dua jalan dan t-test dua sample independen. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara hasil belajar Ekonomi model Numbered Heads Together dengan Make a match, ada interaksi antara penggunaan model pembelajaran dengan sikap siswa terhadap mata pelajaran Ekonomi.
Perbandingan Kualitas Butir Soal Pelajaran Ekonomi antara Sekolah Berakreditas A dan B SMA Negeri Tasya Ayu Destari; Edy Purnomo; Tedi Rusman
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 7 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find the comparison of the quality of the economic items about artificial teachers of high school subject accredited A and accredited B. The methodology that was used in this research was comparative with quantitative approach. The research design used expost facto design. The population in this research were all items question on 17 High School in Bandar Lampung and the sample used by 240 item question with 6 senior high school was determined through random cluster sampling. Data collection technique documentation. Hypothesis testing using t-test of two independent samples. Based on analysis of the data, the quality of economics questions viewed from the level of difficulty, differential power items and validity of high school accredited A is better than high school accredited B, the quality of economics questions viewed from effectiveness and reliability of high school accredited B is better than high school accredited A.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbandingan kualitas butir soal buatan guru mata pelajaran ekonomi antara sekolah berakreditasi A dan berakreditasi B. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah komparatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Desain penelitian yang digunakanexpost facto. Populasi pada penelitian yaitu butir soal seluruh SMA Negeri di Bandar Lampung berjumlah 17 sekolah dan sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 240 butir soal berjumlah 6 sekolah yang ditentukan melaluicluster random sampling.Teknik pengumpulan data melalui dokumentasi. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan t-tes dua sampel independen. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil bahwa kualitas soal dilihat dari tingkat kesukaran, daya beda dan validitas soal ekonomi SMA berakreditasi A lebih baik dari SMA berakreditasi B, sedangkan kualitas soal dilihat dari efektivitas pengecoh dan reliabilitas soal ekonomi SMA berakreditasi B lebih baik dari SMA berakreditasi A.Kata kunci:akreditas sekolah, butir soal, ekonomi.
Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model ST dan NHT Dengan Memperhatikan Gaya Belajar Julian Eka Saputra; Edy Purnomo; Pujiati Pujiati
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 4 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the difference of learning result, the interaction of using cooperative learning model of Snowball Throwing and Numbered Head Together by considering the learning style. The research method used in this research is quasi experiment with comparative approach. The data collected through the test of learning outcomes and analyzed by two-way analysis of variance analysis and two independent sample t-test. Based on the data analysis, it was found that the population of 244 students with the number of samples of 72 students, there was a difference of learning outcomes using the Snowball Throwing model more effective than Model Head Head Together by using visual style, while using Model Head Together is more effective than Snowball Throwing model by using auditorial learning style and interaction using cooperative learning model type Snowball Throwing and Numbered Head Together with attention to learning styleTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar, interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Snowball Throwing dan Numbered Head Together dengan memperhatikan gaya belajar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif. Data yang terkumpul melalui tes hasil belajar dan dianalisis dengan uji analasis varians dua jalan dan t-tes dua sampel independen.Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil bahwa populasi sebanyak 244 siswa dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 72 siswa. Ada perbedaan hasil belajar menggunakan model Snowball Throwing lebih efektif dibandingkan model Number Head Together dengan menggunakan gaya visual, sedangkan menggunakan model Number Head Together lebih efektif dibandingkan model Snowball Throwing dengan menggunakan gaya belajar auditorial dan interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Snowball Throwing dan Numbered Head Together dengan memperhatikan gaya belajar.Kata Kunci : gaya belajar, hasil belajar, number head together, snowballthrowing
Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Model Pembelajaran ETH, GQGA dan TGT Zeyca Wilantini; Yon Rizal; Edy Purnomo
JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis) Vol 5, No 8 (2017): JEE (Jurnal Edukasi Ekobis)
Publisher : FKIP Unila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know the difference of learning outcomes of student analysis which learning using cooperative model type ETH, GQGA and TGT on Economic study learning outcomes. The method used in this research was quasi experiment with comparative approach design Post Test Only, Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The population in this study is as many as 7 classes with the number of 291 students and the sample used as much as 3 classes with the number of 124 students determined through cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques used tests. Hypothesis testing using one way street variance analysis and t-dunnet long testing. Based on analysis of the data, it obtained the results: There is a difference of learning outcomes among students whose learning using cooperative model type ETH, GQGA and TGT on Economic study learning outcomes.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe ETH, GQGA, dan TGT pada mata pelajaran Ekonomi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif desain Post Test Only, Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 7 kelas dengan jumlah 291 siswa dan sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 124 siswa yang ditentukan melalui cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui tes. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis varians satu jalan dan uji lanjut t-dunnet. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil: Ada perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe ETH, GQGA, dan TGT pada mata pelajaran Ekonomi.Kata kunci: Ekonomi, Hasil Belajar, ETH, GQGA, TGT
Co-Authors Defika Putri Nastiti Erlina Rupaidah Fitma Indrawan Hair Vanny Palla Julian Eka Saputra Nurhidayani Yani Pujiati Pujiati Sylvia Imara Nurlaela Tasya Ayu Destari Tedi Rusman Yon Rizal Zeyca Wilantini