Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2017 - 2022
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi
Haniah Ilhami
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Dewan Pengurus Syariah sebagai Otoritas Pengawas Kepatuhan Syariah bagi Bank Syariah Ilhami, Haniah
Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 3 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

Sharia Compliance is important in the management and operational of sharia banks, therefore a sharia supervisory board (Dewan Pengawas Syariah, DPS) is imperative to be established in every sharia-based banks. The problem is, Indonesian sharia banking laws do not clearly regulate the supervisory function of this DPS, hence this study.  Kepatuhan Syariah adalah elemen penting dalam pengelolaan dan operasional bank syariah, dengan demikian sebuah dewan yang bertugas mengawasi penerapan prinsip syariah (Dewan Pengawas Syariah, DPS) harus dibentuk di setiap bank berbasis syariah. Fokus penelitian ini adalah hukum perbankan syariah di Indonesia yang belum secara jelas mengatur fungsi pengawasan DPS.
INTERPRETATION OF SYIQAQAND ITS PROCEDURAL LAW AT RELIGIOUS COURT IN YOGYAKARTA Ilhami, Haniah
Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 26, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

The objective of this research is to identify the interpretation of syiqaq as a legal reason in divorce lawsuit and its procedural law implemented by the Religious Courts in Yogyakarta. This is an empirical normative research, using the literature research method and field research through Focus Group Discussion (FGD). This research found that syiqaq is interpreted as a specific form of an endless quarrelling which caused danger for either husband or wife. In practice, judges combine procedural law in divorce lawsuit based on syiqaq into the procedural law in other legal reason. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui interpretasi syiqaqsebagai alasan gugatan cerai oleh hakim dan praktek hukum acara penyelesaian perkara perceraian dengan alasan syiqaqyang diterapkan pada Pengadilan Agama di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif empiris, menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan melalui kegiatan Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa syiqaqdiinterpretasikan sebagai perselisihan dan percekcokan antara suami istri yang telah menimbulkan bahaya mengancam baik pada para pihak. Dalam prakteknya, hakim menggabungkan proses acara penyelesaian perkara perceraian dengan menggunakan alasan syiqaqke dalam proses beracara untuk perkara yang menggunakan alasan perselisihan terus menerus.
Pengaturan dan Implementasi Wasiat Wajibah di Indonesia Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Ilhami, Haniah; Harahab, Yulkarnain
Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 22, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

This normative and empirical legal research analyses the nature of compulsory will (wasiyah al-wajib) according to the Compilation of Islamic Law and its implementation in Islamic court trial. We will also discuss a number of legal consideration deliberated by the judges when rendering a verdict in a compulsory will case. Penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris ini akan menganalisis sifat pengaturan wasiat wajibah dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan implementasinya dalam pengadilan agama. Penelitian ini juga akan membahas beberapa pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan hakim ketika mengeluarkan putusan dalam suatu kasus pemberian wasiat wajibah.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGULATION RELATED TO OBLIGATORY BEQUEST (WASIAT WAJIBAH) IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC INHERITANCE LAW SYSTEM Ilhami, Haniah
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 27, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.795 KB)

Abstract

This research examine the development of regulation of wasiat wajibah, its legal consideration and the implementation in Religious Court. This research founds the addition of legatee of wasiat wajibah which are children born out of wedlock, children in unregistered marriage, and stepchildren. The consideration of those addition are relation between Inheritance Law with Marriage Law System, relation of legal rights and responsibilities, status of children through Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU VIII/2010, the application of Qiyas method,, and the objective of justice in Inheritance law. In Religious Court, judges only give wasiat wajibah to children born out of wedlock. Penelitian ini meneliti perkembangan pengaturan wasiat wajibah dalam Sistem Hukum Kewarisan Islam di Indonesia, pertimbangan hukumnya, dan implementasinya pada Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian menemukan penambahan kelompok penerima wasiat wajibah yaitu anak yang lahir di luar perkawinan, anak yang lahir di dalam perkawinan tidak tercatat, dan anak tiri yang dipelihara sejak kecil. Pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan adalah keterkaitan Sistem Hukum Waris dengan Sistem Hukum Perkawinan, hubungan Hak dan Kewajiban, status anak dalam Putusan MK Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010, penggunaan metode Qiyas, dan tujuan keadilan dalam hukum waris. Dalam implementasinya, Pengadilan Agama hanya memberikan wasiat wajibah kepada anak yang lahir di luar perkawinan
Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 dalam Upaya Mencegah Perkawinan Usia Anak Ilhami, Haniah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.084 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1723

Abstract

This research concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 which mandates the legislators to revise the age-limit of marriage, is irrelevant in preventing child-age marriages. Indonesian marriage legal system continues to open up opportunities for deviations of the principle of age-limit of marriage  through Dispensation of Marriage. This research finds the juridical development on Dispensation of Marriage on the type of marriage requiring Dispensation of Marriage, the applicant of Dispensation of Marriage, the authority to provide Dispensation of Marriage, and the administrative requirements to submit the Dispensation. Based on these developments, several factors that cause irrelevancy of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 in preventing child-age marriages are the absence of specific requirements in the application of Dispensation of Marriage to the court, the existence of the Principle of Freedom in procedural law, the voluntary nature attached in the request for Dispensation of Marriage, as well as the extension of provisions of applicants who can submit an application to the court.
Co-Authors Destri Budi Nugraheni Yulkarnain Harahab