Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA COVERNOTE NOTARIS SEBAGAI PEGANGAN BANK UNTUK MEDIA REALISASI PEMBIAYAAN / KREDIT DALAM DUNIA PERBANKAN Dwi Wahyu Juliyanto; Moch Najib Imanullah
Jurnal Repertorium Vol 5, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to find out the problems of Notary Public’s Covernote as the medium of realizing financing / loan in banking realm. This study was a doctrinal research using 2 (two) approaches relevant to the problem studied: statute and Conceptual Approaches. Considering the result of study, it could be found that no article in Law Number 2 of 2014 about Notary Public Position can be interpreted as the notary public’s authority of releasing recommendation called covernote. Therefore, viewed from its binding power, considering the covernote usually used the guideline by the bank, Covernote is not an authentic deed, because the law does not mention firmly the notary public’s authority of releasing authentic deed, so that viewed legally, in fact, covernote does not have a binding and perfect power of law.Keywords: covernote; binding power; ethical codeAbstrakKajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui problematika Covernote Notaris sebagai media realisasi pembiayaan / kredit dalam dunia perbankan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah doktrinal, menggunakan 2 (dua) pendekatan yang relevan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti, yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan (Statue approach) dan pendekatan Konseptual (Konseptual approach). Berdasarkan hasil kajian bahwa tidak ada satu pasalpun dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris yang dapat ditafsirkan sebagai kewenangan notaris untuk mengeluarkan surat keterangan yang disebut sebagai covernote. Oleh karena itu, jika dilihat kekuatan mengikatnya, dengan hanya melihat covernote yang biasa dijadikan pegangan oleh bank. Covernote bukan akta otentik, oleh karena tidak ditegaskan dalam undang-undang perihal kewenangan notaris untuk mengeluarkan akta otentik, sehingga jika dipandang secara hukum memang pada kenyataannya covernote tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat dan sempurna.Kata Kunci : covernote; kekuatan mengikat; kode etik.
INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC LAW ASPECTS OF CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY IN ORDER TO ESTABLISHING CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY REGULATION IN ASEAN: INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVE Imanullah, Moch Najib; Latifah, Emmy; Ratri, Pramesthi Dinar Kirana
Indonesia Law Review
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increases in cross-border trade has resulted in more companies with assets, business, and presence in multiple jurisdiction. When any of these companies face debt restructuring or insolvency, it confronts a myriad of complex issues in coordinating rescue proposals or winding up the businesses across jurisdictions. Prior to the 1997 economic crisis, insolvency laws in most state economies were generally out of date and irrelevant to the modern commercial needs, particulary the cross-border insolvency matters that has not been well regulated. ASEAN has initiated an integrated economy regional by launching an ASEAN Economic Community on late 2015. It aimed to establish a deeply integrated and highly cohesive ASEAN economy that would support sustained high economic growth and resilience in the face of global economic shocks and volatilities within ASEAN members. Unfortunately, ASEAN member has not prepared a regulation regarding cross-border insolvency matters which could restrains its aim to establish a fully integrated economy regional. Each state members has its own national insolvency laws and proceedings, but none have the schemes that could surpassed the national borders and simplified the procedures. The aspects of cross-border insolvency from both the international law and domestic law of Indonesia is already prepared to deal with foreign proceedings. Both could be adjusted to establish a cross-border regulation in ASEAN. Hence, there should be an in-depth harmonization of cross-border insolvency should be another priority upon ASEAN Economic Community to achieve a fully-integrated economy in ASEAN.
KARAKTERISTIK PERJANJIAN GUARANTEED STOCK BERDASARKAN KONSEP ‘NIAT UNTUK MENCIPTAKAN HUBUNGAN HUKUM’ (Komparasi dalam Sistem Hukum Common Law dan Civil Law) Roby Agung Kurniawan; Moch Najib Imanullah; Al Sentot Sudarwanto
Arena Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01301.3

Abstract

AbstractThe requirements of intention to create legal relation in an agreement have been a long debate between states both in common law and civil law countries. The absence of legal rules regarding guaranteed stock makes the guaranteed stock agreement a source of legal implementation in the UK. This article purposes to know the importance of the “intention” in guaranteed stock agreement to be applied in Indonesia. This is a normative legal research using comparative approach which compares the concept of intention in a guaranteed stock agreement in the UK with the concept of intention based on Indonesian contract law. The result of this research is that fi rst, intention as a consideration which discuss about the interests of the parties and the second, intention as a fulfi llment of the consensualism principle that guarantee the validity of the implementation of guaranteed stock agreement in Indonesia.AbstrakPersyaratan mengenai ‘niat untuk menciptakan hubungan hukum’ dalam sebuah perjanjian menjadi perdebatan yang panjang antara negara dengan sistem hukum common law dengan sistem hukum civil law Tidak adanya aturan hukum mengenai guaranteed stock memposisikan perjanjian guaranteed stock sebagai sumber hukum pelaksanaannya pada saat itu di Inggris Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pentingnya ‘niat’ dalam perjanjian guaranteed stock untuk dapat diterapkan di Indonesia Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan yaitu membandingkan antara konsep ‘niat’ dalam perjanjian guaranteed stock di Inggris dengan konsep ‘niat’ berdasarkan hukum perjanjian di Indonesia Bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari bahan hukum primer berupa KUHPerdata dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku dan artikel jurnal yang tervalidasi yang berkaitan dengan isu hukum yang ada Hasil yang didapatkan yang pertama adalah ‘niat’ sebagai konsiderasi yaitu membahas mengenai kepentingan para pihak dan kedua adalah ‘niat’ sebagai pemenuhan atas asas konsensualisme guna menjamin keabsahan dari penerapan perjanjian guaranteed stock di Indonesia