Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.704
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Diponegoro Law Journal Law, Development and Justice Review Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Erlyn Indarti
Faculty Of Law Diponegoro University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

 1 
Bone Montete Inda Posala-Sala: Kesetaraan di Hadapan Hukum Pada Kesultanan Buton Muh. Afif Mahfud; Erlyn Indarti; Sukirno Sukirno
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 21, No 3 (2019): Vol. 21, No. 3 (Desember 2019)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v21i3.13850

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan pengaruh ajaran Islam dan pemisahan kekuasaan pada perumusan prinsip bone montete inda posala-sala. Penegakan hukum di Kesultanan Buton didasarkan pada prinsip kesetaraan di hadapan hukum yang disebut bone montete inda posala-sala. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis serta menggu-nakan data sekunder, yaitu bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa asas bone montete yinda posala-sala pada Kesultanan Buton dipengaruhi oleh ajaran Islam. Ini tampak dari ilmu tasawuf yang mendasari perumusan asas tersebut. Pemisahan kekuasaan di Kerajaan Buton turut mendukung implementasi asas bone montete yinda posala-sala. Fungsi peradilan yang dilaksanakan oleh sultan sebagai lembaga eksekutif diawasi Siolimbona sebagai lembaga legislatif. Direkomendasikan bahwa pemerintah mengadopsi nilai-nilai lokal dalam perumusan asas kesetaraan di hadapan hukum dan intensif mengkaji nilai-nilai lokal yang dapat berkontribusi dalam pengembangan hukum nasional. Bone Montete Inda Posala-Sala: Equality Before the Law in Buton Sultanate This research aims to describe the influence of Islamic teachings and the separation of powers in formulating the principle of “bone montete inda posala-sala”. Law enforcement in Butonese Sultanate is based on the equality before the law principle named “bone montete inda posala-sala”. This research apply normative juridical method by using conceptual and historical research based on secondary data namely primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicates that the principle of bone montete yinda posala-sala is influenced by Islamic teachings. This can be seen from the sufism that underlies the formulation of the principle. The separation of powers also supported the implementation of the principle. Judicial function under Sultan as an excecutive is supervised by Siolimbona as an legislative agency. It is recommended that the government should adopts local wisdoms in the formulation of the principle and intensively studies local values that can contribute to the development of national law.
Agrarian Justice and Contextuality in Maxim Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum and Fiat Justitia Ne Pereat Mundus Muh. Afif Mahfud; Erlyn Indarti; Sukirno Sukirno
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23, No 1 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 1, April 2021
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i1.20178

Abstract

Maxim is a short sentence with deep meaning related to value and purpose of law include agrarian law. This article analyse the meaning of fiat justitia ruat caelum and fiat justitia ne pereat mundus as well as its relation to agrarian justice and its contextuality. Both of those maxim are paradigmatically analysed. This is a normative juridical research, use conceptual and historical approach with secondary data then qualitatively analysed. Concluded that fiat justitia ruat caelum and fiat justitia pereat mundus is part of legal formalism. The agrarian justice is achieved when the law is enforced as the text and its acontextual. In contrast, fiat justitia ne pereat mundus consider law is valid when it is according to the purpose and agrarian justice exist when it bring out prosperity for all people. Paradigmatically, fiat justicia ruat caelum and fiat justitia pereat mundus fall in positivism paradigm, consider rule is perfect, no interpretation, separation of law and morality, impossibility of interdisciplinary approach. In another hand, fiat justitia ne pereat mundus falls in post positivism paradigm which consider law is imperfect, interpretation is possible, no separation of law and morality and interdisciplinary approch is opened. The law is acontextual.
Co-Authors Amalia Diamantina Amiek Soemarmi Armunanto Hutahaean Dian Wijayanto Fitri Ayu Lestari*, Nabitatus Saadah, Muhamad Azhar, Fitri Ayu Lestari*, Mochamad Rizqi Nurridlo Muh. Afif Mahfud Pujiyono Pujiyono Sukirno Sukirno Tri Laksmi Indreswari Wenny F Limbong*, Eko Soponyono, Umi Rozah, Wenny F Limbong*, Yosua Hardi Nugroho