Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2018 - 2023
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional
Ihdi Karim Makinara
Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP MASYARAKAT MISKIN ( Meninjau Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum) Ihdi Karim Makinara
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 2, No 1 (2013): April 2013
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.55 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i1.78

Abstract

Bantuan hukum adalah salah satu upaya mengisi hak asasi manusia (HAM) terutama bagi lapisan masyarakat termiskin rakyat Indonesia. Bantuan hukum harus dimaknai dan dilaksanakan sebagai upaya perjuangan menegakkan HAM bagi si miskin. Tujuan bantuan hukum perlu diperluas, dak saja terbatas pada bantuan hukum individual, tetapi juga struktural dan juga jangan terbelenggu dengan jalur-jalur formal semata. Dengan diundangkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum memunculkan permasalahan bagaimana pengaruh bantuan hukum terhadap masyarakat? Dengan menggunakan metode peneli an norma f dan dengan pendekatan data secara kualita f yang dianalisis deskrip f, didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa keberadaan Undang-Undang Bantuan Hukum belum maksimal memberikan pengaruh terhadap bantuan hukum bagi masyarakat miskin, karena bantuan hukum masih dalam jalur formalis k dan masih bersifat pasif. Pendanaan penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum yang digeser dari Mahkamah Agung, Kejaksaan Agung, dan Kepolisian kepada Menteri Hukum dan HAM dan dilaksanakan oleh Lembaga Bantuan Hukum atau Organisasi Kemasyarakatan agar dapat menyentuh orang atau kelompok orang miskin, tetapi besar anggaran perlu memper mbangkan proses peradilan yang berjalan, karena dikhawa rkan dapat menghambat orang miskin dan kelompok orang miskin untuk mengakses keadilan guna mewujudkan hak-hak kons tusional mereka.Legal aid is an effort to fulfill human rights, especially for Indonesian poorest society. Legal aid should be interpreted and implemented as an effort of human rights enforcement for the poor. The purpose of legal aid should be expanded, not just limited to individual legal assistance, but also structural and not fe ered by mere formal channels. By enacted the Law Number 16 Year 2011 on Legal Aid, raises the ques on of how the in fl uence of legal assistance to the society? By using norma ve research methods and approaches qualita ve data were descrip vely analyzed, was concluded that existence of legal aid has not been maximized e ff ect to legal assistance for the poor, and because of it is s ll on formalis c track and passive. Funding of legal assistance shi ed from the Supreme Court, A orney General and Police to the Ministry of Jus ce and implemented by a Legal Aid Ins tu on or civil society organiza on in order to reach people or the poor community, but the magnitude of budget needs to consider the judicial process, because it feared could hinder the poor to access of jus ce to realize their constuonal rights.
PENGENYAMPINGAN PIDANA DENDA BAGI PENJUAL KHAMAR: QANUN, PUTUSAN HAKIM DAN TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF Ihdi Karim Makinara
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 7, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v7i2.3258

Abstract

This study discusses criminal prosecution of fines for perpetrators of jarimahkhamar crimes in Aceh. Uqubatta'zir was previously formulated alternative cumulative in Article 26 paragraph (2) Qanun NAD Number 12 Year 2003 and has been used in Decision Number 22/JN/2009/MS.Mbo.The judges of the MahkamahSyari'iyyahMeulaboh did not impose a fine on the convicted person.The culprit is a non-Muslim, he has a family, and this is his second crime. While Article 16 paragraph (1) and (2) Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 formulates a fine with an alternative formulation. If the formulation in these two paragraphs finds a concrete legal event, what judge will use a fine to the same perpetrator. Judge is not a funnel of law, so it must give justice according to the situation of the convicted person. Because the criminal not only reply, but educate and prevent.
Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali Hasballah, Khairuddin; Darna, Andi; Said, Wardana; Akbar, Hajarul; Karim Makinara, Ihdi; Fauzan, Faisal
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10914

Abstract

This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines. 
Kontestasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menyelesaikan Polemik Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh Karim, Zahlul Pasha; Akbar, Khairil; Makinara, Ihdi Karim
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i2.13876

Abstract

Abstract: This article tries to trace the steps of the House of Representatives which revoked two articles in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Governance, namely Article 57 and Article 60 paragraph (1), (2) and (4), which relate to the Aceh election institution through Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Later, the Constitutional Court's action was annulled by the Constitutional Court because it violated the formal procedure for amending the Aceh Governance Law. The research method was carried out normatively with two problem formulations, why did the House of Representative revoke two articles of the Aceh Governance Law related to election management institutions in Aceh without complying with and even violating the procedures regulated by the Aceh Governance Law as a special law? Why did the Constitutional Court annulled the revocation of the two articles and consider them unconstitutional? The result showed that the revocation of the two articles was carried out by the House of Representative for several reasons, namely removing the dualism of the election supervisory agency in Aceh and tidying up the structure of the election management body in Indonesia to comply with the provisions of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In 1945 and strengthening election administration institutions in the face of simultaneous elections in 2019. Meanwhile, the steps were taken by the Constitutional Court to cancel the revocation of the two articles and judge them as unconstitutional because the House of Representative did not conduct consultations and asked the Aceh People's Representative Council for consideration in the revocation process.Keywords: Aceh Election Commission; Election Supervisory Committee; Aceh Governance Law; Election Law.Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan menelusuri langkah DPR yang mencabut dua pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh (UUPA), yakni Pasal 57 dan Pasal 60 ayat (1), (2) dan (4), yang berhubungan dengan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Belakangan, pencabutan itu dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi karena dinilai inkonstitusional. Metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif dengan dua rumusan masalah, mengapa DPR mencabut dua pasal UUPA terkait lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh tanpa mematuhi tata cara yang telah diatur oleh UUPA sebagai undang-undang khusus? Mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional? Adapun metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, teori, dan historis. Hasilnya diperoleh bahwa pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dilakukan DPR karena beberapa alasan, yakni menghapus dualisme lembaga pengawas pemilu di Aceh dan menertibkan struktur lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia agar sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 22E ayat (5) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sementara langkah Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional dikarenakan DPR tidak melakukan konsultasi dan meminta pertimbangan DPRA dalam proses pencabutan.Kata Kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Lembaga Pemilu Aceh; Undang-undang Pemilu.
Co-Authors Akbar, Hajarul Darna, Andi Fauzan, Faisal Hasballah, Khairuddin Karim, Zahlul Pasha Khairil Akbar Said, Wardana