Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional
Ihdi Karim Makinara
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : SAMARAH:%20Jurnal%20Hukum%20Keluarga%20dan%20Hukum%20Islam

 1 
Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali Khairuddin Hasballah; Andi Darna; Wardana Said; Hajarul Akbar; Ihdi Karim Makinara; Faisal Fauzan
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10914

Abstract

This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines. 
Co-Authors Abdul Jalil Salam Andi Darna Faisal Fauzan Hadi Nasbey Hajarul Akbar Hasnul Arifin Melayu Jamhir Jamhir Khairil Akbar Khairuddin Hasballah MD Zawawi Abu Bakar Rusjdi Ali Muhammad Sarah Fadhilah Wardana Said Zahlul Pasha