Prischa Listiningrum
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERDEBATAN EKSISTENSI DAN KEDUDUKAN PERATURAN PRESIDEN DALAM HIERARKI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA Listiningrum, Prischa
Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2013
Publisher : Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perdebatan eksistensi dan kedudukan Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) yang cukup sengit dalam Rapat Panitia Khusus (Pansus) Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (RUU P3) antara DewanPerwakilan Rakyat (DPR RI) sebagai penginisiasi RUU dan Pemerintah, menggelitik penulis untuk mengkaji lebih dalam mengenai keberadaan Perpresdalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia, terutama dalam hierarki peraturanperundang-undangan. Jika dirujuk kembali kepada UUD 1945, tidak disebutkan secara langsung mengenai adanya Perpres dan jika dilihat sebagai produk eksekutif (Pemerintah), maka keberadaan Perpres sebagai aturan pelaksana undang-undang hampir sama dengan Peraturan Pemerintah (PP), yakni sama-sama bertindak sebagai delegated legislation. Sehingga demi efisiensi, DPR mengusulkan penghapusan Perpres dari hierarki. Pendapat ini tentunya harus dikaji secara mendalam, mengingat Perpres merupakan kewenangan Presiden yang muncul atas konsekuensi dianutnya sistem pemerintahan presidensial dimana Presiden sebagai penyelenggara pemerintahan tertinggi mempunyai original power dalam memutus dan mengatur.
UNRAVELING THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN CASES OF DEATHS RESULTING FROM THE ACTIONS OF STATE AGENTS UNDER THE SYSTEM OF ECHR Listiningrum, Prischa
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (114.259 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01.04

Abstract

it shall be done in a certain threshold of necessity. In particular when the taken of life is done by the agents of states. This article examines the interpretation of article 2 by the European Court of Human Rights, especially when it is read in conjunction with state’s positive obligations under article 1. The discussion will proceed in three sections: first, the review of the evolvement of the procedural requirements of article 2 in cases of deaths arising from the acts of state agents. Second, is the examination of whether the procedural requirements of article 2 can be used as a mean in securing the adequate protection of the right to life from arbitrary killing by the use of lethal force. Third, is an analysis of an effective legal system as a procedural requirement of article 2 in the case of homicide caused by the negligence of the authorities. Finally, this essay will conclude by examining the Court’s position in its endeavours to achieve an appropriate balance between not over-burdening its Member States and securing the adequate protection of the right to life.
Improving Indonesia's Commitment to Open Government Through Online Petition Kusumaningrum, Adi; Bachtiar, Rizqi; Listiningrum, Prischa
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (508.662 KB)

Abstract

Since 2011 Indonesia has joined as a member of Open Government Partnership, which is an international platform for countries committed to making their government more open, accountable, and responsive to citizens. However, the implementation of open government in Indonesia is criticized by some researchers because of the simplification of meaning. Open government is often described as uploading all government information into the official government website.Therefore, alternative policies are needed to ensure the openness of the government. This study offers the idea of ​​creating an online petition system officially administered by the House of Representatives as an alternative forum. The petition system offered is different from the conventional online petition system, because the conventional system does not have clear legal umbrella and is managed by Non-Governmental Organizations. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the addition of the authority to the Parliament, it is expected that the system will strengthen the oversight function by the Parliament. Nevertheless, the alternative solution offered in this study is highly dependent on the political will of the government and the House of Representatives in making clear and legal rules.