Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unnes Science Education Journal JIPB (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi)
Aprizal Lukman
Staf Pengajar di Program Magister Pendidikan IPA Universitas Jambi
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Education Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI METODE BRAINSTORMING UNTUK MENGANALISIS PENGETAHUAN SISWA MENGENAI KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI PADA MATA PELAJARAN BIOLOGI Wicaksana, Ervan Johan; Lukman, Aprizal
Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi Vol 1, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengetahuan kesehatan reproduksi pada mata pelajaran Biologi siswa SMA menggunakan metode Brainstorming. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SMAN 10 kota Jambi di bulan Februari 2020 dengan penelitian kualitatif. penelitian sebanyak 30 siswa kelas XI IPA. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes, angket, dan wawancara. Hasil akhir dari validator instrumen adalah 87,5% dengan kategori “sangat baik” dan sudah layak digunakan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data menggunakan N-gain dapat diketahui bahwa hasil pre-test yaitu 57,16 dan post-test yaitu 77,50. Rata-rata nilai N-Gain dari hasil pre-test dan post-test yang termasuk kedalam kriteria sedang. Respon sangat baik diberikan siswa terhadap metode brainstorming yang digunakan pada saat menyampaikan materi kesehatan reproduksi. Persentase respon siswa mengenai keterlaksanaan metode brainstorming sebesar 87,25%. Sehingga dapat dikatetahui metode brainstorming cukup efektif dan membantu dalam menyampaikan materi tentang sistem reproduksi terutama pada materi kesehatan reproduksi
Misconception Analysis: A Necessary Complement to Investigated the Causes of Students’ Misconception in Conducting Research and Development Wicaksana, Ervan Johan; Lukman, Aprizal; Siburian, Jodion
Unnes Science Education Journal Vol 10 No 3 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : Department of Integrated Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in Collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/usej.v10i1.42719

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the need for the development of learning books in the form of research and development (R&D) model books to deal with student misconceptions in final project writing. This study analyzes student needs so that practical actions can be found in the early stages of developing research books. The development of R&D books that is carried out is expected to be able to deal with student misconceptions. Errors in understanding R&D are often experienced by students in the mentoring process which emphasizes the end result rather than the development process. The proposed solution is to use misconseption analysis (MA). This type of research is research and development or R&D (research and development) which refers to the ADDIE model with data analysis techniques using descriptive statistics. This stage is the initial stage of ADDIE, namely analysis. Data were obtained from 11 student respondents from a university consisting of three men and eight women. Based on the data collected, the results of student assumptions in understanding development research are not in accordance with actual understanding. The assumption data for students’ understanding of R&D development is 18.18% very understanding, 27.27% understanding, 36.36% quite understanding, 18.18% do not understand. 0.00% don’t understand. Whereas in fact the understanding of students in R&D development is 0.00% very understanding, 9.09% understands, 27.27% understands quite well, 36.36% does not understand, and 27.27% does not understand. The majority of students in research using the R&D method experience misconceptions. The concept that they believed was correct, it turned out that after being studied there were several mistakes or misunderstandings. Students do not get the main source of input in the mentoring process. The misconception is also caused by the fact that in writing a thesis, students have not received references that are studied in depth about the development model.
Co-Authors Ervan Johan Wicaksana Jodion Siburian