Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Muhammad Rustamaji
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perspektif Hukum Pidana Dalam Polemik Pengajuan Sumpah Advokat: Telaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-XVII/2018 Atas Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 Faisal Faisal; Muhammad Rustamaji
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art2

Abstract

The discussion regarding a single forum for advocates has been widely analyzed, but after the issuance of the Letter of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Number 73 / KMA / HK.01 / IX / 2015, the concept of a single container still leaves big questions. One of the questions in the realm of criminal law is whether the letter of the Chief Justice that allows an advocate organization other than PERADI to propose an Advocate oath to the High Court can be categorized as an act against criminal law and can be held criminally responsible at the same time? This type of normative legal research uses a conceptual approach and a case approach, especially with regard to judicial reviews. The collection of legal materials is carried out by studying the literature on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study concluded that the issuance of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court No. 73/2015 which allowed advocacy organizations other than PERADI to propose an advocate's oath to the High Court could lead to acts against material criminal law. However, it is difficult to realize criminal liability for acts against criminal law due to the incomplete formulation, especially regarding the concept of contempt of court.
Co-Authors . Faisal