Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Asuhan Kesehatan Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kebidanan dan Keperawatan Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JURNAL PERIKANAN TROPIS Jurnal Sains Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri
Mardiyana Mardiyana
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 116 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 116 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION PADA MATERI GARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN MAGETAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Annurwanda, Pradipta; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (306.276 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student emotional intelligences. The learning model compared were TGT, TAI and direct learning. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental. The population was all of student seventh grade of junior high school in Magetan regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sampling technique by using a stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 252 students with 85 students as experimental class I, 86 students as experimental class II, 81 students as control class. The data collections were taken by document, questionnaire and test method. Hypothesis testing was performed by using an unbalanced two way analysis of variance. The conclusions of  the research were as follows: (1) TGT learning model give better mathematics achievement than TAI and direct learning model, TAI learning model give an equal mathematics achievement to direct learning model, (2) the high level emotional intelligence students have an equal mathematics achievement to the middle level emotional intelligence students, the high level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low level emotional intelligence students, the middle level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low level emotional intelligence students, (3) for the high level emotional intelligence students, TGT, TAI and direct learning models give the same mathematics achievement, for the middle level emotional intelligence students, TGT learning model give the same mathematics achievement as TAI and direct learning model, direct learning model give better mathematics achivement than TAI learning model, for the low level emotional intelligence students, TGT learning model give the same mathematics achievement as TAI learning model, TGT learning model give better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, TAI learning model give the same mathematics achievement as direct learning model, (4) on the TGT and TAI learning models, students in each level of emotional intelligence have the same mathematics achievement, for student with direct learning model, the high level emotional intelligence students have the same mathematics achievement as middle and low level emotional intelligence students, the middle level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than low level emotional intelligence students.Keywords: Teams Games Tournaments, Team Assisted Individualization, direct learning, emotional intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN TEKNIK KANCING GEMERINCING PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI 2013/2014 Swastika, Annisa; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (405.935 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to reveal the effect of TGT cooperative learning model with talking chips technique, TGT cooperative learning model, and direct learning model to the mathematics achievement in polyhedron subject viewed from mathematics communication ability. The type of this research was a quasi-experimental by 3x3 factorial design. The population was the eighth grade of Junior High School students at Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics achievement test and mathematics communication ability test. Analysis of the data used was unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusion of this research shows that TGT cooperative learning model with talking chips technique gives the same achievement as TGT cooperative learning model, but gives better achievement than direct instruction model, and TGT cooperative learning model gives better achievement than direct instruction model. It shows the same result in each categories of mathematics communication ability. Another conclusion shows that students with high mathematics communication ability have the same achievement as students with middle mathematics communication ability but they have better achievement than students with low mathematics communication ability, and students with middle mathematics communication ability have better achievement than students with low mathematics communication ability. It shows the same result in each learning model.Key words: TGT, Talking Chips, and mathematics communication ability
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR PADA SISWA SMP KELAS VII DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Ambarwati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.991 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of research is to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from students independence learning. The type of the research is a quasi-experimental. The population are the seventh grade students of junior high school at Surakarta. The sample are 268 students. Sampling is done by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments which are used to collect data are achievement tests and questionnaire of students independence learning. Hypothesis test is two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of this research are as follows: 1) the TPS-GNT learning model gives better learning achievement than TPS and direct learning model, and TPS learning model gives better learning achievement than direct learning model. 2)  the students with high independence learning have better learning achievement than students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have better learning achievement than students with low independence learning. 3) in each  learning model, the students with high, medium and low independence learning have the same learning achievement. 4) in the high independence learning, students with TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning model have the same learning achievement, but in the medium and low independence learning, students with TPS-GNT learning model have better learning achievement than students with direct model, students with TPS-GNT and TPS learning model have the same learning achievement and students with TPS and direct learning model have the same learning achievement.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Guided Note Taking  (GNT), Independence Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA KEDIRI Yannuansa, Nanndo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (302.491 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models of TAI Type with contextual approach, learning models of TAI and direct learning model on mathematics achievement viewed from learning style. The type of the research was quasi experimental research using design factorial 3x3. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in a city of Kediri. The samples of the research consisted of 321 students; 107 students belonged to experiment class one, 103 students belonged to experiment class two, and 111 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. Before giving the treatment, the population  had to be in balanced condition. The balance test used one way analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The hypothesis test used two ways analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies at the significance level of 0.05. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning, the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (2) Each of the learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic does not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students who taught by the TAI with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (4) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: TAI learning models, contextual approaches, and learning style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI PERBANDINGAN DAN SKALA DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PESERTA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Rahayu, Puji; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.416 KB)

Abstract

Abstrack: The aims of this research were to determine: (1) the better students’ achievement in learning by using Problem Based Learning (PBL), Discovery Learning (DL) or direct learning models (2) the better students’ achievement among the students who have positive, neutral or negative attitude (3) the better students’ achievement in each category attitude, in learning by using PBL, DL or direct learning models (4) the better students’ achievement in each learning model, among the students who have positive, neutral or negative attitude. This research used a quasi-experimental research with the population of seventh grade students of Junior High Schools in Klaten Regency which have implemented curriculum 2013 in the Academic Year 2013/2014. The sampling technique used stratified cluster random sampling and three schools selected namely SMPN 1 Delanggu, SMPN 1 Prambanan and SMPN 2 Wedi.  Two-way variance analysis was used to test the hypothesis, followed by scheffe’ technique. Considering the result of analysis, the following conclusion could be drawn. (1) The students’ achievement who learnt by using DL was better than PBL and direct learning models. The students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL were similar to direct learning models. (2) The students’ achievement with positive attitude was better than neutral and negative attitude. The students’ achievement with neutral attitude was better than negative attitude. (3) In the positive and neutral attitude, the students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL, DL and direct learning models were similar. In the negative attitude, the students’ achievement who learnt by using DL model were better than PBL and direct learning models and the students’ achievement who learnt by using PBL and direct models were similar. (4) In learning by using PBL, the students’ achievement with positive attitude were better than negative one, the positive and neutral attitude ware similar and the neutral and negative attitude were similar too. In learning by using DL, the student’s achievement with positive, neutral and negative attitude were similar. In learning by using direct learning, the students’ achievement with positive attitude were better than the negative one, the positive and neutral attitude were similar and the neutral and negative attitude were similar too.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Discovery Learning, students’ Attitude, achievement of mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN STRATEGI PETA KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL SISWA Bilda, Westi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.03 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the spatial intelligence students. The type of this research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of the VIII class of MTsN Ngawi Regency in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of the research consisted of 314 students and were taken through stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used were spatial intelligence test and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) NHT and mind concept gives better mathematics achievement than NHT model and direct learning model, and NHT model gives the same mathematics achievement as direct learning. 2) The high spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than midlle and low spatial intelligence students, midlle spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than low spatial intelligence students, 3) For NHT and mind concept and NHT, students having high, moderate and low spatial intelligence have the same achievement. For direct learning model, students having high spatial intelligence had better achievement than students having moderate and low, then, students having moderate spatial intelligence have better achievement than students having low spatial intelligence. 4) For students having high and moderate spatial intelligence NHT and mind mapping concept model, NHT and direct instructionl model have the same effect toward students’ achievement. For students having low spatial intelligence, NHT and mind concept gives better learning achievement than NHT. NHT gives better learning achievement than direct learning model. NHT gives the same learning achievement as direct learning model.Keywords: NHT, mind mapping concept, spatial intelligence.
PENGEMBANGAN BUKU ELEKTRONIK TRIGONOMETRI DENGAN MENGINTEGRASIKAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS, TEKNOLOGI, SEJARAH, DAN APLIKASI TRIGONOMETRI Wulandari, Ika; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.204 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed (1) to formulate the need of trigonometric book content, (2) to develop prototype into trigonometric electronic book, and (3) to find out the result of evaluation on the feasibility of electronic book developed for teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors. A research and development method was used to provide a trigonometric electronic book. This method encompassed the following stages: (1) exploring: analyzing library study and case study, (2) developing: designing the product until it became a trigonometric electronic book, and (3) evaluating: studying  the feasibility of trigonometric electronic book. The results were reveals as follows: 1) The identification of trigonometric content should pay attention to: (a) geometric reasoning and understanding such as: symbol, distance, pythagorean theorem, circle, triangle, angle, and pi concept, (b) function reasoning and understanding such as: representation (numeric, chart, symbolic/algebraic, verbal), and representation interrelationship, (c) trigonometric function reasoning and understanding such as: definitions of function based on unit circle, based on right triangle side ratio, multiple representation and property in trigonometric main function, (d) history and the chronology of trigonometric function inception, and (e) the application of trigonometric function in real world. 2) The development of prototype into trigonometric electronic book was conducted with the following procedures: (a) design analysis based on the identification of book content need, (b) the development of book content, (c) the alignment of illustration, chart, table, game, video and layout, (d) designing the application (.exe), electronic book pdf and html, 3) Expert judgment: material expert rated 4.07 (Good), media expert rated 4.03 (Good). The result of evaluation showed that: (a) in Trial I, the product users’ candidates rated 4.95 (Very Good) for material aspect and 4.8 (Very Good) for media aspect, (b) in Trial II, the product users’ candidates rated 4.79 (Very good) for material aspect, and 4.61 (Very Good) for media aspect. Considering the result of feasibility test of materials and media expert, trials I and II for feasibility test of users’ candidates, this trigonometric electronic book was feasible to be used as the handout for the students as teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors.Keywords: trigonometric electronic book, mathematic reasoning, technology, history, and trigonometric application.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) YANG DIMODIFIKASI PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Sasomo, Budi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (232.31 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning independency. The learning model compared were modified GI, GI and direct learning. This research  was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri in Pacitan regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it were concluded that: 1) modified GI learning model give better achievement than GI and direct learning, while GI learning model and direct learning gave the same achievement. 2) Students with independent type have better achievement than students with individualistic type, conscientious type and self-conscious type, students with individualistic type have better achievement than students with conscientious type and self-conscious type, students with conscientious type and self-conscious type have the same achievement. 3) For all of learning independency type, modified GI learning model give better achievement than GI learning model and direct learning, GI learning model and direct learning give the same achievement.  4) For all of learning models,  students with independent type, individualistic type, conscientious type and self-conscious type have the same achievement.Keywords: Modified Group Investigation (GI), student learning independency. 
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN MAKE A MATCH TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DITINJAU DARI KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL SISWA PADA KELAS X SMK DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI TAHUN AJARAN 2012/2013 Destiningsih, Nuryani; Usodo, Budi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
JIPM Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : JIPM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui : ( 1 ) yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi belajar , penggunaan kooperatif tipe model pembelajaran NHT , Membuat Pertandingan atau pembelajaran langsung , ( 2 ) yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi belajar , peserta didik dengan tinggi, sedang , atau rendah tingkat keterampilan sosial, ( siswa dengan tinggi , sedang, atau rendahnya tingkat keterampilan sosial , ( 3 ) di masing-masing keterampilan sosial , mana yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi , model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT , Membuat Match . atau pembelajaran langsung , ( 4 ) masing-masing model pembelajaran , mana yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi , siswa yang memiliki tinggi, sedang , atau keterampilan sosial yang rendah penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi - eksperimental kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah : . ( 1 ) prestasi matematika siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe model NHT lebih baik daripada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan atau instruksi langsung , sedangkan siswa matematika prestasi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan lebih baik daripada belajar langsung , ( 2 ) siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah , sehingga prestasi matematika yang sama , sedangkan siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah memiliki prestasi matematika yang lebih baik adalah dari siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang rendah , ( 3 ) pada setiap keterampilan sosial ( tinggi, menengah , dan rendah ) , siswa matematika prestasi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan atau instruksi langsung , dan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan memiliki lebih baik daripada prestasi matematika hands- on belajar , ( 4 ) pada masing-masing model pembelajaran ( NHT , Membuat Match, dan belajar langsung ) , siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah , memiliki prestasi matematika yang sama , sedangkan siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah matematika yang lebih baik daripada prestasi siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang rendah belajar .Kata kunci : Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) , Membuat Match, pembelajaran langsung , dan keterampilan sosial.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, GROUP INVESTIGATION, DAN THINK TALK WRITE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA Nuraya, Naufalia; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.077 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to know the different effect among learning models used i.e, Discovery Learning (DL) with scientific approach, Group Investigation (GI) with scientific approach, and Think Talk Write (TTW) with scientific approach. The research method was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of district Tegal year of 2014/2015. Sample was taken by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used two way MANOVA with unbalanced cell. The results of the research were as follows: (1) a. Learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning achievement of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. Mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and mathematics learning creativity of student treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (2) a. Learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. Mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; (3) a. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, learning achievement of students treated by DL with scientific approach is better than those treated by GI and TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of student treated by GI with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by TTW with scientific approach; b. In the high, medium, and low reasoning ability, mathematics learning creativity of students treated by DL and GI with scientific approach is better than those treated by TTW with scientific approach, and learning creativity of students treated by DL with scientific approach is the same good with student treated by GI with scientific approach; (4) a. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, learning achievement of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and learning achievement of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability; b. In DL, GI, and TTW with scientific approach, mathematics learning creativity of students who have high and medium reasoning ability is better than those who have low reasoning ability, and mathematics learning creativity of students who have high reasoning ability is the same good with students who have medium reasoning ability.Keywords: DL, GI, TTW, Scientific Approach, Reasoning Ability, Learning Achievement, Mathematics Learning Creativity.
Co-Authors Abdul Choliq Hidayat Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Afrizal Abdi Musyafiq Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Putra Wijaya, Agung Putra Ambar Nurhayati Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Anggrahini Anggrahini Annisa Swastika Aritsya Imswatama Arsa’ad Kurniadi Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin Berti Okta Sari, Berti Okta Budi Sasomo, Budi Budi Usodo Danar Supriadi Desi Gita Andriani Dewi Retno Sari Dewi Retno Sari S Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Ratna Ariyani, Dian Ratna Dwi Ambarwati, Dwi dwi hidayati Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu Eka Fitria Ningsih EKA RAHAYU PUJILESTARI, EKA RAHAYU Ekaningsih Haryati Eli Widoyo Retno Endang Hariyati Endang Sri Handayani Fahimah Andini Fina Hanifa Hidayati Fitri Apriyani Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani Gatut Iswahyudi Hafidh Jauhari Harmei Mahar’ Aini Hera Susanti Heri Cahyono Hirtanto Hirtanto, Hirtanto Iim Marfuah Ika Wulandari Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Intan Sari Rufiana Isna Nur Lailatul F, Isna Nur Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Joko Domas, Joko Julian Reza Siwi Kristin Yulianti Kristiningsih, Ari Kristiningsih, Ari Mania Roswitha Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardi Mardi Nana Hasanah Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Naufalia Nuraya, Naufalia Noor Hidayati Novia Dwi Rahmawati Nurul Hidayatus, Nurul Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Pitra Dwiningsih, Pitra Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prihastini Oktasari Putri, Prihastini Oktasari Puji Ayuni Puji Rahayu Purwaningrum, Santi Pusaka, Semerdanta Rafiq, Arif Ainur Rahayu Sri W Ratnasari Ratnasari Rino Richardo Riski Aspriyani Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Sabar Santosa Savitri, Maria Endah Septiana Wijayanti Siti Amirah Budiastuti Siti Rahayu Sri Subanti Stefy Erlinda Novalia, Stefy Erlinda Sugihardjo Sugihardjo Sulistiyono Sulistiyono Sumanah Sumanah Supriyatin Supriyatin Susmono Susmono Sutanto, Aftoni Sutarman Sutarman Sutrima Sutrima Sutrisno Sutrisno Suyono Suyono Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Toipur Toipur Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Silaningsih Tunjung Genarsih, Tunjung Very Hendra Saputra Wahyu Astuti Budi Wahyu Kurniawan Wardani, Endang Purwati Westi Bilda, Westi Wicaksana, Hafid Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan Yundari, Yundari Yusnita Rahmawati