Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Pembangunan Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi TEKNOLOGI PANGAN : Media Informasi dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Teknologi Pertanian
Rizka Maulida
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGALIHAN KEWENANGAN BAPEPAM-LK KEPADA OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM HAL PENGAWASAN TRANSAKSI EFEK(Studi di Kantor Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pusat) Rizka Maulida
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2015
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (401.734 KB)

Abstract

Otoritas jasa keuangan merupakan lembaga yang independen dalam melaksanakan fungsi dan tugasnya. Salah satu tugasnya ialah melakukan pengawasan pasar modal, meningkatnya kegiatan transaksi efek dalam pasar modal membutuhkan suatu pengawasan yang baik untuk terjadinya pasar modal yang teratur dan wajar sehingga tidak adanya kejahatan dalam dunia pasar modal seperti manipulasi pasar. Dalam mewujudkan pengawasan yang baik maka terjadi pengalihan pengawasan dari Bapepam-LK kepada OJK sejak 31 desember 2011. Oleh karena itu Otoritas Jasa Keuangan memiliki pengawasan dalam sektor pasar modal agar terjadi pengawasan yang terintegrasi. Oleh karena itu Otoritas Jasa keuangan mempuyai upaya peningkatan pengawasan pasar modal khususnya sektor transaksi efek. Namun dalam mengerjakan tugasnya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan menghadapi hambatan-hambatan baik secara internal maupun ekternal dan OJK mempuyai cara untuk mengatasi hambatan-hambatan tersebut agar mewujudkan pengawasan yang terintegrasi.Kata kunci :Pengalihan Kewenangan, OJK, Transaksi efek, pengawasan integrasi
ANALISIS KARATERISTIK KEMISKINAN DI KOTA BANDA ACEH Rizka Maulida; Diana Sapha A.H
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Pembangunan Vol 3, No 3 (2018): Agustus 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UNSYIAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (177.593 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik penduduk miskin di kota Banda Aceh. Ruang lingkup penelitian ini adalah karakteristik penduduk miskin yang tinggal di daerah perkotaanyang dipengaruhi oleh karakteristik sosial demografi, karakteristik pendidikan, karakteristik ketenagakerjaan, karakteristik tempat tinggal (perumahan),dan karakteristik pola konsumsi rumah tangga. Penelitian menggunakan sampel sebanyak 100 orang responden yang mewakili dari masing-masing kecamatan di Kota Banda Aceh. Pada umumnya terdapat dua indikator untuk mengukur tingkat kemiskinan di suatuwilayah, yaitu kemiskinan relatif dan kemiskinan absolut. Mengukur kemiskinan dengan mengacu pada garis kemiskinan disebut kemiskinan absolut, sedangkan konsep kemiskinan yang pengukurannya tidak didasarkan pada garis kemiskinan yang pengukurannya tidak didasarkan pada garis kemiskinan disebut kemiskinan relatif.Gambaran hasil yang didapati dari analisis karateristik kemiskinan di Kota Banda Acehtermasuk di dalam garis kemiskinan relatif dikarenakan beberapa persen dari pendapatan nasional yang diterimakan oleh kelompok penduduk dengan kelas pendapatan tertentu dibandingkan dengan proporsi pendapatan nasional yang diterima oleh kelompok penduduk dengan kelas pendapatan lainnya.Disarankan bagi Pemerintah untuk memberikan bantuan pendidikan, pelatihan, modal, dan teknologi bagi penduduk miskis sehingga dapat mengembangkan produktivitas masyarakat dan menjalankan program yang sudah tersedia dengan bijaksana sehingga dapat berjalan dengan efektif.Kata Kunci: Karakteristik Sosial Demografi, Karakteristik Pendidikan, Karakteristik Ketenagakerjaan, Karakteristik Tempat Tinggal (Perumahan) dan Karakteristik Pola Konsumsi Rumah Tangga.
ANALISIS AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN WAQAF PADA BAITUL MAL PROVINSI ACEH Rizka Maulida; Ridwan Ridwan
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi Vol 2, No 4 (2017): November 2017
Publisher : Accounting Departement Economics and Business Faculty Syiah Kuala University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Accountability of management of waqf is not in accordance with Act No. 41 of 2004 on Baitul Mal of Aceh province, due to the lack of socialization of Law and Accountability management of waqf has not been complied with by Act No. 41 of 2004 on Baitul Mal Province Aceh, because its implementation does not refer to the Law, Accountability waqaf management yet to be implemented and carried out activities in accordance with legislation and qanuns waqf, which is caused due to lack of training or development provided by the organization to improve the reliability of waqf manager. Pewaqaf did not pay attention and consider the ability nazir, so as to manage the waqf property is not optimal due to the lack of socialization of Law Number 41 Year 2004 on Waqf and Aceh Qanun No. 10 of 2007 on BaitulMal.
PENGARUH MODAL ORGANISASI BERSIH, PELUANG PERTUMBUHAN, VOLATILITAS LABA, DAN PENJUALAN KREDIT TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG PADA PERUSAHAAN MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2011-2014 Rizka Maulida; Adhisyahfitri Evalina Ikhsan
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi Vol 3, No 2 (2018): Mei 2018
Publisher : Accounting Departement Economics and Business Faculty Syiah Kuala University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of net organizational capital, growth opportunity, earnings volatility, and credit sales either simultaneously or partially toward debt policy. The samples are food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) during 2011-2014. Purposive sampling method was used to select the data. Total samples are 10 companies with a total of 40 observations for 4 years. The data analysis used is multiple linear analysis by using SPSS version 22.0. The results showed that: (1) simultaneously, net organizational capital, growth opportunity, earnings volatility, and credit sales affect the debt policy; (2) partially, net organizational capital and growth opportunity do not have influence toward debt policy, while earnings volatility and credit sales are positively affect the debt policy.
Karakteristik susu probiotik fortifikasi belimbing wuluh (Averrhoa bilimbi) dengan perbedaan konsentrasi bakteri (Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota) Rizka Maulida; Khoirin Maghfiroh

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Universitas Yudharta, Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35891/tp.v14i1.3514

Abstract

???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? (???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????) ???????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????????. ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????, ???????????????????? ????????????????????, ???????????? ????????????????????????????????-3-????-β-????-???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? (????????????) ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????. ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? (????????????) ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? 25% ???????????? 50% (????/????) ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? 4%, 6%, ???????????? 8% (????/????). ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????, ????????, ???????????????????? ????????????????????????????, ???????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???? ????????????-???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????'???? ????????????????. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? 50% (????/????) ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? 6% (????/????) ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????: ???????????????????????????????????? 0.036 ????????.????; ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? 0.37%; ???????? 4.4; ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? 7.9; ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????, ????????????????????, ????????????????????, ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? 3,4 (???????????????????????????????? ????????????????); 3.8 (????????????????????); 3.6 (????????????????????); ???????????? 3,4 (???????????????????????????????? ????????????????).
Co-Authors Adhisyahfitri Evalina Ikhsan Diana Sapha A.H Khoirin Maghfiroh Ridwan Ridwan