Anti Mayastuti
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

POLA MEDIASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADAT Mayastuti, Anti
PARENTAL Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia is a country that has a value of harmony, tolerance, and communalism precedence over the values ​​of individualism, therefore the type of dispute resolution further highlight the type of win-win solution compared disputes through litigation. The concept of dispute resolution through mediation using the principle of win-win solution in fact has been recognized in local community life traditional or indigenous people of Indonesia. The main characteristic of the mediation process is essentially the same as the negotiation process of deliberation or consensus. Mediation is not the best option to resolve the dispute, but as a goal in dispute with deliberation and consensus approach, the relationship between the two parties to the dispute to be maintained, so as to create social harmony.
EFEKTIVITAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN DALAM MENDUKUNG PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI DAN PENGEMBANGAN WILAYAH KOTA SURAKARTA Mayastuti, Anti
PARENTAL Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Traffic and road transport has a strategic role in supporting development and national integration as part of efforts to promote the general welfare, as mandated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, so it requires a synergistic relationship (synergistic relationship) between the implementation of UU No. 22 Tahun 2009 on Traffic and Transportation with economic development and regional development especially in Surakarta. The Government is obliged to keep the roads safe, orderly and smooth, so as to encourage development in areas of the economy and industry, particularly in the areas of production, consumption and distribution of goods or services, either within or between Surakarta, with the ex-residency of Surakarta, in order to achieve equitable development and its results, economic growth and balanced development of the region.
The Problematic Issue of Sharia Court’s Absolute Authority under Indonesia Judicial System Hastuti, Luthfiyah Trini; Mayastuti, Anti; Lukitasari, Diana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Indonesian J. Crim. L. Stud. (November, 2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v5i2.28111

Abstract

The amendment of the Sharia Court position within the Indonesia’s public court jurisdiction is contained in Article 27 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Powers where the existence of the Sharia Court is no longer stated to be included in the scope of the special court within this law. The amendment set different tone from what is contained in Law No. 4 of 2004 which in the elucidation of Article 15 states that, the Sharia Court is part of a special court. The problematic issue of Sharia Court’s absolute authority in Aceh province under Indonesia judicial system is also the main study discussed in this article. At the end of the article, suggestions for improvement are also presented in order to strengthen the position of the Sharia Court in Indonesia judicial system.
The Problematic Issue of Sharia Court’s Absolute Authority under Indonesia Judicial System Hastuti, Luthfiyah Trini; Mayastuti, Anti; Lukitasari, Diana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Indonesian J. Crim. L. Stud. (November, 2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v5i2.28111

Abstract

The amendment of the Sharia Court position within the Indonesia’s public court jurisdiction is contained in Article 27 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Powers where the existence of the Sharia Court is no longer stated to be included in the scope of the special court within this law. The amendment set different tone from what is contained in Law No. 4 of 2004 which in the elucidation of Article 15 states that, the Sharia Court is part of a special court. The problematic issue of Sharia Court’s absolute authority in Aceh province under Indonesia judicial system is also the main study discussed in this article. At the end of the article, suggestions for improvement are also presented in order to strengthen the position of the Sharia Court in Indonesia judicial system.