Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) The Southeast Asia Law Journal Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum
Lilik Mulyadi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang Mulyadi, Lilik
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.191 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji lebih detail model ideal perlindungan hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam upaya penanggulangan organized crime di Indonesia untuk masa yang akan datang (ius constituendum). Model ideal perlindungan hukum bagi Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator ini harus berorientasi kepada model hak-hak prosedural, partisipasi langsung, atau aktif. Model ideal ini juga berbentuk model pelayanan atau model partisipasi tidak langsung atau model pastif (the service model), model persuasif atau partisipasi, model perlindungan komprehensif, model penjatuhan pidana bersyarat dan model perlindungan melalui teleconference.Kata kunci: justice collaborator, perlindungan hukum, organized crime, whistleblower, hak-hak prosedural. Legal Protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to Eradicate Organized Crime in IndonesiaAbstractThis paper examines the ideal model of legal protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to eradicate organized crime in the future Indonesia (ius constituendum). The proposed ideal models shall refer to procedural rights model, direct or active participation model. The other ideal models are: services model; persuasive or participatory model; comprehensive protection model; criminal punishment model; and teleconference based model.Keywords: justice collaborator, legal protections, organized crime, whistleblower, procedural rights.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a9
Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang Lilik Mulyadi
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.191 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji lebih detail model ideal perlindungan hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam upaya penanggulangan organized crime di Indonesia untuk masa yang akan datang (ius constituendum). Model ideal perlindungan hukum bagi Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator ini harus berorientasi kepada model hak-hak prosedural, partisipasi langsung, atau aktif. Model ideal ini juga berbentuk model pelayanan atau model partisipasi tidak langsung atau model pastif (the service model), model persuasif atau partisipasi, model perlindungan komprehensif, model penjatuhan pidana bersyarat dan model perlindungan melalui teleconference.Kata kunci: justice collaborator, perlindungan hukum, organized crime, whistleblower, hak-hak prosedural. Legal Protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to Eradicate Organized Crime in IndonesiaAbstractThis paper examines the ideal model of legal protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to eradicate organized crime in the future Indonesia (ius constituendum). The proposed ideal models shall refer to procedural rights model, direct or active participation model. The other ideal models are: services model; persuasive or participatory model; comprehensive protection model; criminal punishment model; and teleconference based model.Keywords: justice collaborator, legal protections, organized crime, whistleblower, procedural rights.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a9
The Shifting of Burden of Proof on Corruption Offences in Indonesia After The Ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003 Lilik Mulyadi; . Ismail
The Southeast Asia Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Postgraduate of Jayabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (558.527 KB) | DOI: 10.31479/salj.v2i1.77

Abstract

This article describes the result  of a research  regarding  the shifting of burden  of proof  on corrup-  tion offenses in the Indonesia after the ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. T he article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and compar- ative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concerto cases. Regulation  and concep-  tual approach to used how to know, existences, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offenses in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offender between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especially  article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003 (KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic.Keywords: Corruption; The Shifting of Burden of Proof; Balanced Probability of Principles         
PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA JENIS BARU DI POLDA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Endang Sulistyandini; Lilik Mulyadi; JS Murdomo
Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.191 KB) | DOI: 10.37159/jmih.v2i1.578

Abstract

PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA JENIS BARU DI POLDA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
ASAS STRICT LIABILITY DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Fajar Yudi Ariyanto; Lilik Mulyadi; Sigit Setyadi
Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (540.882 KB) | DOI: 10.37159/jmih.v2i1.568

Abstract

The study aims to examine and analyze: the strict liability principle in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and the ideal concept of strict liability principle in the Criminal Justice System. This type of research is normative research. This study uses secondary data. Data collection was done by document study and interview. Data analysis in this research is qualitative. Based on the result of the research, it is concluded that, Arrangement of strict liability principle in Criminal Justice System in Indonesia one of them can be seen in KUHP and outside KUHP. The Criminal Code does not explicitly mention the system of criminal liability held. Several articles of the Criminal Code only mention errors of intent or negligence. Outside of the Indonesian Criminal Code, the setting of strict liability principles in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System can be seen among others in the Environmental Law and Narcotics Act and the ideal concept of strict liability principle in the Criminal Justice System is explicitly affirmed in positive law, as defined in Article 35 Paragraph 2 The new Draft Penal Code, whose formula is: For certain criminal acts, the law may determine that a person may be criminally solely because of the fulfillment of the elements of the crime without regard to any errors. 
Co-Authors Endang Sulistyandini Fajar Yudi Ariyanto Ismail Ismail JS Murdomo Sigit Setyadi