Yohannes Suardin
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Eksistensi Outsourcing dan Kerja Kontrak Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Yohanes Suhardin
Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA Vol. 27 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (7192.891 KB)

Abstract

Eksistensi Outsourcing dan Kerja Kontrak Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia
Peranan Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Yohanes Suhardin
Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA Vol. 25 No. 3 (2007)
Publisher : Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9537.443 KB)

Abstract

Peranan Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat
POLITIK HUKUM TERHADAP PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA DARI PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Yohannes Suardin
Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 1
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (993.092 KB) | DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v1i1.911

Abstract

The existence of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia has been quite clear that it also encompasses marginal communities, one of which is street vendors, although explicitly it cannot be read. This is already apparent from one of the national goals contained in the 4th paragraph Opening of the Constitution of the Republic of the Republic which states "promoting public welfare". However, it is implicit in the provisions of Article 34 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in particular paragraph (2) of the state developing a social security system for all people and empowering people who are weak and unable to comply with human dignity. Promote general welfare (goodness) called bonum commune, including the marginal community, especially the street vendors who are specifically analyzed in this article. Thus, legal politics towards street vendors from the perspective of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is adequate, and what must be improved is the political will of partiality towards street vendors.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENGURUS KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DALAM HAL KOPERASI GAGAL BAYAR TERHADAP SIMPANAN BERJANGKA MILIK ANGGOTA (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 3075 K/Pdt/2016) Rina Uli Banjarnahor; Janus Sidabalok; Yohanes Suhardin
Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (486.198 KB) | DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v2i2.1774

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap simpanan berjangka milik anggota dan pertanggungjawaban pengurus dalam hal Koperasi gagal bayar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 3075 K/Pdt /2016. Putusan Mahkamah Agung ini menguatkan dan mengambil alih seluruh pertimbangan dalam Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar, Pengadilan Tinggi Medan dalam perkara yang sama. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepentingan anggota koperasi, termasuk simpanan anggota dilindungi dengan berbagai ketentuan nyang terdapat didalam Anggaran dasar Koperasi yang bersangkutan, dengan memberi hak kepada anggota koperasi dapat bertindak aktif dalam melakukan pengawalan kepengurusan koperasi sebagaimana diatur dalam UU Perkoperasian. Secara khusus kepentingan anggota dilindungi melalui perjanjian yang dibuat oleh pihak koperasi dengan anggota. Apabila perjanjian itu tidak dilaksanakan salah satu pihak maka, salah satu pihak itu dapat digugat di pengadilan. Dalam hal koperasi wanprestasi untuk mengembalikan simpanan milik anggota, koperasi bertanggungjawab dengan cara mengembalikan simpanan berjangka dengan bunga yang telah di perperjanjikan oleh koperasi dengan anggota melalui penjualan aset koperasi. Sementara itu pengurus tidak dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban secara pribadi karena pengurus bukanlah pihak yang mengikatkan diri dalam perjanjian simpanan dan juga bahwa dengan diterimanya laporan pertanggungjawaban pengurus saat Rapat Anggota tahunan, berarti pengurus tidak mempunyai kesalahan dalam pengurusan koperasi dan dengan demikian membebaskan pengurus dari segala tuntutan hukum.
Fenomena Mengabaikan Keadilan dalam Penegakan Hukum Yohanes Suhardin
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (391.131 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16261

Abstract

Happening phenomenon in law enforcement at current Indonesia is while justice progressively most moves over. Justice tend is ignored in law enforcement, eventually justice is fundamental and realities of laws. Even frequent being said justice is its heart of law, therefore while in law enforcement justice be ignored, law becomes not wherewith. Justice institute as institute foremost and castled deep enforcement episodic law functions as institute of place law to be kidded, commercialized and even commercial it’s called with jurisdiction mafia. That jurisdiction mafia takes shelter at turns back rule of law. To rule of law, justice and utility is sacrified. Apparatus enforcer law just focussed on legal security aspect without tries to respond society justice charge that wants that deep law enforcement to be done by that progressive ala close to justice point in society. It visually of justice verdict those are assessed soft especially in impacted corruption matter negative to realize it national aim which is society which fairs and affluent.
POLITIK HUKUM TERHADAP PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA DARI PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Yohannes Suardin
Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 1
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (993.092 KB) | DOI: 10.54367/fiat.v1i1.911

Abstract

The existence of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia has been quite clear that it also encompasses marginal communities, one of which is street vendors, although explicitly it cannot be read. This is already apparent from one of the national goals contained in the 4th paragraph Opening of the Constitution of the Republic of the Republic which states "promoting public welfare". However, it is implicit in the provisions of Article 34 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in particular paragraph (2) of the state developing a social security system for all people and empowering people who are weak and unable to comply with human dignity. Promote general welfare (goodness) called bonum commune, including the marginal community, especially the street vendors who are specifically analyzed in this article. Thus, legal politics towards street vendors from the perspective of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is adequate, and what must be improved is the political will of partiality towards street vendors.
UPAYA MEMPERTAHANKAN HAK KONSUMEN MELALUI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DENGAN CARA KONSILIASI DI BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN KOTA MEDAN Cindy Octabriel Sirait; Janus Sidabalok; Yohanes Suhardin
Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (265.406 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the process of resolving consumer disputes by means of conciliation and to determine the efforts to defend consumer rights at the Medan Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK).This research is descriptive, using normative-empirical research methods with a focus on the enforcement or implementation of normative legal provisions on consumer dispute resolution. Data or information obtained from BPSK Medan. in the form of notes and information regarding the settlement of consumer disputes by means of conciliation. The results show that the consumer dispute resolution process at BPSK Medan City is different from that regulated in Law No. 8/1989 on Consumer Protection and Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade No.350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 concerning Implementation of Duties and Authorities BPSK. Disputes are resolved by the parties accompanied by a conciliator assembly appointed by the BPSK leadership. After the parties obtain an agreement, then it is reported to BPSK which is then stated in a peace agreement which will be strengthened by the BPSK Decision. In fact, consumer disputes were resolved by parties outside of BPSK after BPSK held the first meeting, and subsequently the final settlement was not reported so that BPSK could not make decisions to strengthen the peace reached by the parties.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA AKIBAT PERCERAIAN MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 755/Pdt.G/2017/PN Mdn) Novi Febrianti Damanik; Yohanes Suhardin; Christopher Panal Lumban Gaol
Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (383.636 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kesesuaian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 755/Pdt.G/2017/PN Mdn mengenai gugatan harta bersama menurut KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 755/Pdt.G/2017/PN Mdn, berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 35 jo Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan jo Pasal 128 KUHPerdata, maka sebidang tanah berikut bangunan ruko di atasnya dan Usaha Bengkel Saudara Jaya Motor adalah harta bersama yang diperoleh penggugat dan tergugat semasa perkawinan penggugat dan tergugat. Adapun harta benda yang tidak dapat dibagi adalah satu unit mobil merek Honda CRV, hal ini dikarenakan tidak ada satu alat bukti surat ataupun keterangan saksi penggugat yang mempunyai nilai kekuatan pembuktian untuk mendukung dalil gugatan penggugat bahwa mobil tersebut diperoleh penggugat dan tergugat dalam masa perkawinan sebagaimana dalam ketentuan Pasal 1865 KUH Perdata yang mengatur mengenai pembuktian. Oleh karena itu, putusan tersebut telah sesuai dengan Pasal 128 KUH Perdata dan Pasal 35 jo Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.