Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal
I Gede Rusdy Mahayana Putra
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Computer Science & IT

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
IDENTIFIKASI CITRA UKIRAN ORNAMEN TRADISIONAL BALI DENGAN METODE MULTILAYER PERCEPTRON I Gede Rusdy Mahayana Putra; Made Windu Antara Kesiman; Gede Aditra Pradnyana; I Made Dendi Maysanjaya
SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): SINTECH Journal Edition April 2021
Publisher : LPPM STMIK STIKOM Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31598/sintechjournal.v4i1.552

Abstract

Balinese ornament carving are a cultural heritage that is owned by especially the Balinese people. However, especially Balinese people only know the shape of the carving without knowing the name and characteristics of the Balinese traditional carving ornaments. Based on these problems, the researchers have a solution to research about Balinese Ornament Carving Identification by utilizing digital image processing technology. In this study uses Gabor Filter as a feature extraction from the carved image that used and Multilayer Perceptron as a classifier. There are 18 (eighteen) classes of Balinese carving ornaments use in this study with a total of dataset is 268 (two hundred and sixty eight). The purpose of this study was to determine the level of identification  accuracy  of Balinese ornament carving with Multilayer Perceptron method. In the implementation using digital image processing technic with Multilayer Perceptron method was based on backpropagation learning algorithm with 10560 neuron input layers, 50 neuron hidden layers, and 18 neuron output layers as classifier obtained the accuracy for testing is 43%. Classification testing based on k-fold cross validation with K=5 results in average accuracy of 41.14% with optimum accuracy of 56% and accuracy testing with Confusion Matrix obtained the accuracy 43.3%, sensitivity 42.68% and specificity 96.87%. 
Co-Authors Gede Aditra Pradnyana I Md. Dendi Maysanjaya Made Windu Antara Kesiman