Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Development Research SIGn Jurnal Hukum
Maskun Maskun
Universitas Hasanuddin
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Environmental Legal Protection Against Mangrove Forest Destruction In Lantebung Area, Makassar City Hasriani Hamid; Muhammad Said Karim; Maskun Maskun
Journal of Development Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Volume 6, Number 2, November 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jdr.v6i2.220

Abstract

This study aims to examine the position of environmental permits in the perspective of environmental crimes against cases of mangrove forest destruction in Makassar City. This study uses a normative-empirical research method, namely the type of normative legal research that is supported and equipped with empirical data. The research approach method used is the statutory approach and the case approach. The types and sources of data used are primary data and secondary data. Furthermore, both secondary and primary data were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques and presented descriptively. The results of this research are: The position of environmental permits in the perspective of environmental crimes is an absolute thing to be fulfilled. The environmental permit which was originally regulated in UUPPLH has now been amended in a new regulatory provision, namely Article Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is an environmental agreement. The nomenclature is different, but the meaning remains the same, namely both environmental permits and environmental approvals are needed to limit the space for business actors to move so as not to deviate from the permits given.
Media Sosial dalam Proses Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Rionov Oktana; Syukri Akub; Maskun Maskun
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 2: Oktober 2022 - Maret 2023
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze social media accounts’ status and seizure procedures in the evidentiary process of cybercrime. This study uses normative legal research with a statute and case approach. The collection of legal materials is carried out using a literature study technique. The collected legal material is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer study purposes. The results show that the status of social media as legal means of proof in the evidentiary process at trial is regulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 and Law no. 8 of 1981. Electronic evidence can be categorized as proof of indication by fulfilling the formal and material requirements regulated in Law No. 11 of 2008. Meanwhile, seizure procedures of social media accounts in the evidentiary process of cybercrime are preceded by searching mobile phone communication to obtain device specifications. Social media accounts, files, documents, and applications used by cybercrime perpetrators will be found in these specifications. Seizure of social media accounts is regulated in Article 43 section (3) of Law No. 19 of 2016, while the procedure is carried out based on Law No. 8 of 1981. Therefore, it is recommended that the government and law enforcement agencies issue implementing regulations regarding seizing social media accounts as legal means of proof in the evidentiary process of electronic information and transaction crimes. In addition, collaboration between the Ministry of Communications and Informatics and social media platforms is needed to handle more accessible and more efficient cases, mainly regarding seizures of social media accounts used by cybercrime perpetrators. On the other hand, it is necessary to expand the meaning of proof of indication as regulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 in order to be able to emphasize social media proof as a legal means of proof.
Co-Authors Hasriani Hamid Muhammad Said Karim Rionov Oktana Syukri Akub