Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI)
Silviana Farrah Diba
Department Of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty Of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281
Dentistry Energy Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Physics

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Efek Aplikasi Patch Gingiva Mukoadesif β-Carotene Akibat Paparan Radiografi Panoramik Rurie Ratna Shantiningsih; Silviana Farrah Diba
Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia Vol 1, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (435.886 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.9121

Abstract

Effect of β-carotene Gingival Mucoadhesive Patch Application at Panoramic Radiography Exposure. According to previous research, β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch has a radiation protection effect on New Zealand Rabbits. The increase in micronucleus after panoramic radiography exposure is avoided because of β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch application. In order to continue that research, we try the application of β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch into human. Twenty subjects who requested to take panoramic radiography were divided into two groups randomly. Group I was without β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch application and Group II was given the application before radiography exposure. Each of the subjects was swabbed on anterior maxillary gingiva before radiography exposure and the 10th day after the exposure. The swab was stained using modified Feulgen Rossenbeck method. The adhesive time and the effect of radiograph were also observed. The result shows that there was a decrease in micronucleus number after β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch application but there was no significant difference (p>0,05) between Grup I and II. The adhesive time was more than 10 hours and there was uncomfortable taste in the first time application. Gray scale analysis shows no significant difference (P>0,05) between panoramic radiography application and without application. The conclusion is that β-carotene gingival mucoadhesive patch application reduces micronucleus number although not significantly.
Biological changes after dental panoramic exposure: conventional versus digital Rurie Ratna Shantiningsih; Silviana Farrah Diba
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) Vol. 51 No. 1 (2018): March 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.135 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i1.p25-28

Abstract

Background: Dental digital radiography is more practical and requires fewer doses of radiation than conventional radiography. Because ionizing radiation has a biological effect on exposed tissue, concerns regarding its stochastic effect merit greater attention. In a previous study, it was found that biological changes and increases in the micronucleus occurred after conventional panoramic exposure to gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in biological effects after digital panoramic exposure compared with conventional exposure. Methods: Twenty subjects were classified into two groups according to the radiographic technique employed. The techniques consisted of ten subjects undergoing digital panoramic radiograph exposure and ten others being subjected to conventional exposure. GCF calculated in mm3 was collected by applying paper strips to the anterior maxillary labial gingival sulcus for one minute prior to and ten minutes after exposure. A micronucleus was obtained from a gingival smear on the same quadrant ten days after panoramic exposure. Results: There was a significant difference in the number of micronuclei between conventional and digital panoramic radiographs both before and after exposure (p=0.000). In contrast, increased GCF volume was not statistically significant (p=0.506) before or after digital panoramic exposure, while the significant difference of conventional panoramic exposure was p=0.017. Conclusion: Digital panoramic radiograph exposure induced a biological change only in terms of an increase in the number of micronuclei but not in the volume of GCF.
Panoramic and periapical radiographs utilization in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI): narrative review Vivin Nadine Ekayultania; Ryna Dwi Yanuaryska; Silviana Farrah Diba
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI) Vol 5 No 3 (2021): Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI)
Publisher : Ikatan Radiologi Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jrdi.v5i3.714

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this narrative review is to discover radiographic images in panoramic and periapical radiographs that are used as identifiers and to compare the use of panoramic and periapical radiographs in identification based on DVI. Review: The databases used in this narrative review are Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct. A total of 1258 search results appeared based on keywords. The search results were selected by title and abstract according to their relevance to the review topic, then results are selected again based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Total of 38 literatures were reviewed. This review shows radiographic identifiers used in panoramic radiographs are tooth restorations, crown, Root Canal Treatment (RCT), dental bridge, dental implants, maxillary sinus, rectilinear metal plate, orthodontic brackets, tooth anomaly, and root morphology. The radiographic identifiers used in periapical radiograph are tooth restorations, PSA, tooth anomaly, and root morphology. In this review, 53.8% of the literatures used panoramic radiograph for identification, whereas 46.2% used periapical radiograph. Conclusion: This review concluded that the most used radiographic identifier in panoramic radiograph is tooth restoration (57,1%) whereas in periapical radiograph is RCT (83,3%). Panoramic radiography were used in 53,8% of the literatures in this review, it was used more than periapical radiography.
Kista radikuler besar yang melibatkan dasar cavum nasalis Silviana Farrah Diba; Lusi Epsilawati; Rike Kapriani
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI) Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI)
Publisher : Ikatan Radiologi Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jrdi.v3i3.439

Abstract

Objectives: This case will present a radicular cyst and its expansion effect, seen from cone beam CT (CBCT) 3D radiograph. Case Report: A 32-year-old patient complained about discoloration of her upper anterior teeth and swollen gums. Periapical radiograph for preliminary examination revealed a large radiolucent area with well-defined cortical border in periapical 21. In coronal view, the lesion extends to 22 also causes the destruction of the nasal cavity floor and palatal cortical bone. Endodontic, cyst enucleation, and bone graft was performed to the patient. After endodontic treatment, CBCT examination was performed to determine the extent of cyst lesions. Conclusion: Large lesion needs an adequate radiographic technique to examine anatomical structure involvement. In large cysts, CBCT examination is matter to consider.
Artificial intelligence based on Convolutional Neural Network for detecting dental caries on bitewing and periapical radiographs Amelia Roosanty; Rini Widyaningrum; Silviana Farrah Diba
Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI) Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia (JRDI)
Publisher : Ikatan Radiologi Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jrdi.v6i2.867

Abstract

Objectives: This narrative review is written to describe the accuracy of caries detection and find out the clinical implications and future prospects of using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to determine radio-diagnosis of dental caries in bitewing and periapical radiographs. Review: The databases used for literature searching in this narrative review were PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The inclusion criteria were original article, case report, and textbook written in English and Bahasa Indonesia, published within 2011-2021. The exclusion criteria were articles that the full text could not be accessed, research article that did not provide the methods used, and duplication articles. In this narrative review, a total of 33 literatures consisting of 30 articles and three textbooks reviewed, including four original articles on CNN for caries detection. Conclusion: Results of the review reveal that GoogLeNet produces the best detection compared to Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) and U-Net for caries detection in bitewing and periapical radiographs. Nonetheless, the positive predictive value (PPV), recall, negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, F1-score, and accuracy values in these architectures indicate good performance. The differences of each CNN’s performances to detect caries are determined by the number of trained datasets, the architecture’s layers, and the complexity of the CNN architectures. The conclusion of this review is CNN can be used as an alternative to detect caries, increasing the diagnostic accuracy and time efficiency as well as preventing errors due to dentist fatigue. Yet the CNN is not able to substitute the expertise of a radiologist. Therefore, it is need to be revalidated by the radiologist to avoid diagnostic errors.
Co-Authors Amelia Roosanty Lusi Epsilawati Rike Kapriani Rini Widyaningrum Rurie Ratna Shantiningsih Ryna Dwi Yanuaryska Vivin Nadine Ekayultania