Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PETANI PENGGARAP TANAH NEGARA MILIK PERUM PERHUTANI Permadi, Iwan
Arena Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (483.728 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.5

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to analyze the legal implications of farmers that are not allowed to work on public land controlled by Perum Perhutani which causes conflicts, especially on land abandoned by Perum Perhutani and determine the form of legal protection against farmers who work the state land ruled by Perhutani to prevent horizontal conflicts between society and Perhutani. The author uses the normative method that is supported by empirical data. Farmers are not allowed to work on land controlled by perhutani because it is considered by Perhutani to be State Land, wherea from the law perspective if the land controlled by Perhutani is abandoned the it becomes free state land that is not entitled. Forms of legal protection against Farmers who work the land ruled by Perhutani state is through preventive and repressive legal protection, namely through the issuance of land titles to the land controlled by the Perhutani but abandoned by Perhutani. AbstrakTulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum petani tidak diperbolehkan menggarap tanah negara yang dikuasai oleh Perum Perhutani  yang mengakibatkan konflik khususnya pada tanah yang ditelantarkan oleh Perum Perhutani dan mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap Petani yang menggarap tanah negara yang dikuasai oleh Perhutani agar tidak terjadi konflik horizontal antara masyarakat dan Perhutani. Penulis menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang didukung dengan data empirik. Petani tidak diperbolehkan menggarap tanah yang dikuasai perhutani karena dianggap oleh Perhutani itu adalah Tanah Negara, padahal secara hukum apabila tanah yang dikuasai oleh Perhutani tersebut ditelantarkan maka akan menjadi tanah Negara bebas yang tidak mempunyai alas hak. Bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap Petani yang menggarap tanah negara yang dikuasai oleh Perhutani adalah melalui perlindungan hukum preventif dan represif, yaitu melalui pemberian hak atas tanah terhadap tanah yang dikuasai oleh Perhutani tersebut tetapi ditelantarkan oleh Perhutani. 
THE AUTHORITY OF VILLAGE GOVERNMENT IN AFFIRMING BORDER MANAGEMENT (CASE STUDY OF GALANG ISLAND DISPUTE) Permadi, Iwan; Yulianti, Rina
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (96.44 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.02

Abstract

Border Disputes related to territorial management between local Governments dominate the ongoing cases within the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Indonesia. This study aims to propose a model of a policy of border Disputes resolution using non-doctrinal legal research (socio-legal research). This research limited itself by looking at Galang Island, the which is disputed between the city of Gresik and Surabaya. To gain Appropriate analyzes, in depth interviews and secondary of data was conducted and collected both in Gresik and Surabaya. Furthermore, this research finds that the reason underpinned such Disputes lays on the weaknesses of village government in the territorial management proofing Formally they have been doing. It is submitted that in forming and affirming border delimitation, Indonesian Act Number 6 year 2014 on Village jo Ministry of Internal Affairs Regulation number 114 year 2014 can used as legal base.
KEWENANGAN KREDITUR DALAM MENJUAL OBYEK JAMINAN TANAH DAN BANGUNAN LETTER C TANPA MELALUI LELANG Santoso, Budi; Permadi, Iwan; Hidayati, Nuri
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (48.072 KB)

Abstract

Tujuan kajian ini adalah mendeskripsikan kewenangan kreditur menju?l obyek j?min?n berup? t?n?h d?n b?ngun?n Letter C sec?r? l?ngsung t?np? mel?lui lel?ng. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif (hukum norm?tif) yang mengkaji dan menganalisis penerapan aturan, kaidah dan norma hukum positif yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi (case law), dan kontrak. Pendekatan untuk menganalisis kajian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kreditur berwenang menjual objek jaminan berupa tanah dan bangunan Letter C tanpa melalui lelang, melainkan melalui penjualan di bawah tangan.
REKONSEPTUALISASI MODEL PROGRAM LANDREFORM YANG BERKEADILAN SOSIAL Permadi, Iwan
Arena Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.3

Abstract

Abstract In Indonesia there are imbalances in land ownership, namely land is mostly owned by land lords, while farmers can only be farm laborers because they do not have enough capital to buy land. This condition will result in an imbalance in the structure of land ownership because farmers should own land, not the owners of capital. This study uses a normative juridical research method using statute and case approach. The results show that one of the methods taken by the Government is a land reform program, namely a concept and strategy for changing the structure of agrarian control in a better direction for rural residents, especially the peasants by changing the structure of land ownership of landlords given to poor farmers who have no land. Reconceptualization of the right model for land reform and equitable redistribution of land is through government policies that have political will to give land to the community, especially landless farmers through the use of rights or management rights. AbstrakDi Indonesia terdapat ketimpangan dalam pemilikan tanah, yaitu tanah sebagian besar dimiliki oleh para tuan tanah (Land Lord), sedangkan para petani hanya bisa sebagai buruh tani karena mereka tidak cukup memiliki modal untuk membeli tanah. Kondisi ini akan mengakibatkan suatu ketimpangan dalam tatanan pemilikan tanah, karena seharusnya para petanilah yang memiliki tanah, bukan para pemilik modal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa salah satu cara yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah adalah dengan program landreform yaitu sebuah konsep dan strategi tentang perubahan struktur penguasaan agraria ke arah yang lebih baik bagi penduduk pedesaan, khususnya kaum tani dengan merubah struktur kepemilikan tanah dari tuan tanah yang diberikan kepada petani miskin yang tidak punya tanah. Rekonseptualisasi model yang tepat untuk landreform dan redistribusi tanah yang berkeadilan adalah melalui kebijakan pemerintah yang mempunyai political will untuk memberikan tanah-tanah kepada masyarakat khususnya petani yang tidak punya tanah melalui alas hak yaitu hak pakai atau hak pengelolaan.
Indigenous Peoples Social Justice in Management of Coastal Areas Yono, Dwi; Permadi, Iwan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 2 No 2 (2016): L. Research Rev. Q. (May 2016) "Pancasila and Global Ideology: Challenges and Con
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v2i01.21315

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have a significant role in the management of coastal areas, in the management of coastal areas based on ecology and local wisdom is part of social justice that involves the State in making laws and regulations in protecting the community in the management of coastal areas and small islands. Indigenous peoples' social justice is related to the government's role in developing coastal areas that neglects the existence of coastal communities, so that the local wisdom of indigenous peoples is marginalized and ignored by the State on the pretext of public interest, while the constitution still provides recognition of the indigenous peoples who are conditional in the State constitution, and its impact is one of them is the existence of Law Number 27 Year 2007 concerning the management of coastal areas and small islands that are ignorant of indigenous peoples revised to Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law No. 27 of 2007 due to the conduct of judicial review in the Constitutional Court due to lack of justice inside it.
Legis Ratio Norms Article 64 of Law No. 1 Year 2004 Concerning State Treasure Pakpahan, Alman P.; Sudarsono, Sudarsono; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Permadi, Iwan
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4, No 3 (2021): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v4i3.2255

Abstract

Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, states firmly that the Treasurer and other officials who have been determined to compensate the state/regional losses in settlements with the dimensions of State Administrative Law may still be subject to administrative sanctions and/or criminal sanctions. And if the treasurer and other officials are processed under criminal law, the criminal decision does not relieve the claim for compensation that has been determined through a settlement with the dimensions of State Administrative Law. Such norms are regulated in Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, of course, has the purpose and intent (ratio legis) of the legislators. Based on research on the minutes of the discussion of the Draft Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, the legislative ratio of Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) in general is 3 (three), namely: as a form of official accountability in carrying out office functions, punishment for Treasurers and Other Officials who are detrimental to State/Regional finances, and realizing the principle of returning State/Regional losses.