Khairul Azwar Anas
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Persada Bunda

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMIDANAAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KHAMAR DAN NARKOBA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF INDONESIA Hulaimi Hulaimi; Lewiaro Laia; Khairul Azwar Anas
PETITA Vol 3, No 2 (2021): PETITA Vol. 3 No. 2 Desember 2021
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.692 KB) | DOI: 10.33373/pta.v3i2.3838

Abstract

Narkotika dan obat-obatan berbahaya (narkoba) mungkin sudah setua umur manusia. Semakin lama, para pemakai narkoba makin meluas di berbagai belahan dunia, termasuk Indonesia. Jenis-jenis narkoba semakin banyak dan canggih. Di abad mutakhir ini, tampaknya tidak ada negara yang terlepas dari problem narkoba. Istilah narkoba dalam konteks hukum Islam, tidak disebutkan secara langsung dalam Alquran maupun dalam Sunnah. Dalam Alquran hanya menyebutkan istilah khamar. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbandingan pemidanaan bagi pelaku tindak pidana khamar dan narkoba dalam hukum Pidana Islam dibandingkan dengan hukum pidana positif Indonesia dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Perbedaan pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana khamar dalam hukum Pidana Islam dibandingkan dengan hukum pidana positif Indonesia adalah dalam hukum Islam, pidana yang dijatuhkan hanya berupa pidana cambuk, sedangkan dalam hukum pidana positif Indonesia, pidana yang dijatuhkan adalah dapat berupa pidana penjara atau pidana denda yang terkait dengan minuman keras yang tergolong pada “kejahatan” dan pidana kurungan atau pidana denda yang terkait dengan minuman keras yang tergolong pada “pelanggaran”. Sanksi bagi pelaku penyalahgunaan narkoba dalam perspektif hukum pidana Islam, mempunyai kesamaan dengan sanksi hukum tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkoba dalam perspektif hukum pidana Republik Indonesia, yaitu keduanya sama-sama menjadi wewenang pemerintah/hakim untuk menentukan sanksi hukumannya.
PERBANDINGAN KONSTITUSI MADINAH DAN KONSTITUSI AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM POLITIK KETATANEGARAAN Duwi Handoko; Rahmad Alamsyah; Hulaimi; Khairul Azwar Anas
JURNAL SOSIO-KOMUNIKA Vol 1 No 2 (2022): November
Publisher : LPPM STISIP Persada Bunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.044 KB) | DOI: 10.57036/jsk.v1i2.26

Abstract

Law is a political product if it is understood to be one in this sense, but it can also refer to law in other senses, such as the constitution or the basic law. Therefore, this study poses the question: How were the fundamental articles of the Medina Constitution established at the outset of a nation? What fundamental rules govern a nation at its inception, according to the United States constitution? And what are the parallels and divergences in the constitutional development of the Medina constitution and the US Constitution? This research is of the normative legal research variety. By studying the literature pertinent to the topic of the research, a literature study is employed as the data gathering technique. Based on the definition of the problem, a systematic data analysis was conducted, and the results were qualitatively stated. Declaring the formation of a new ummah to create a new state was one of the fundamental principles of the Medina Constitution at the time the state was established (Islamic State). At the time of the country's establishment, the fundamental clauses of the United States Constitution were already written.  The  Medina  constitution's  constitutional growth is comparable to that of the US Constitution in that both are written documents that are always being modified. While the United States constitution does not make any religion the form of its state, the Medina Constitution makes Islam the form of its state.
Tantangan Masyarakat dalam Menjaga Persatuan dan Kesatuan di Tahun Politik Duwi Handoko; Beni Sukri; Hulaimi; Khairul Azwar Anas; Lewiaro Laia; Meidizon
JURNAL SOSIO-KOMUNIKA Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Mei
Publisher : LPPM STISIP Persada Bunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57036/jsk.v2i1.36

Abstract

National unity and integrity are crucial for political stability and security in Indonesia. However, during political campaigns, differences in political views and interests often lead to conflicts that can threaten national unity and integrity. This challenge is becoming more complex in the digital era and social media, where information can easily spread and reinforce polarization. Therefore, this research aims to examine the challenges of maintaining national unity and integrity in Indonesia amidst differences in political views and interests during political campaigns and efforts that can be made by the community and the government to overcome these challenges. This research is a normative legal research. The data collection method used is a literature study by reviewing literature related to the research object. Data analysis is carried out systematically based on the research problem formulation and described qualitatively. The challenges faced by society in maintaining national unity and integrity in the political year are framing narratives that reinforce polarization, spreading false information or hoaxes, using hate speech, and using identity politics. Efforts need to be made to overcome these challenges, such as increasing digital and media literacy, developing a better understanding of human rights and equality, and promoting constructive and inclusive dialogues between different social groups. Active involvement from all parties, including the government, society, and media, is also crucial in maintaining national unity and integrity during political campaigns.