Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Numeracy : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika MAJU : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Academy of Education Journal Genta Mulia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jurnal Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Indonesian Railway Journal) Intersections: Jurnal Pendidikan matematika dan matematika
Aji Permana Putra
Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
Aerospace Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal%20S2%20Pendidikan%20Matematika

 1 
EKSPERIMENTASI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DAN OPEN ENDED PADA MATERI SEGITIGA DAN SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PACITAN Putra, Aji Permana; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (248.038 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of circumference and area of triangles and quadrangles: (1) which one produce better learning achievement among Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, open ended approach or a mechanistic approach; (2) which had better learning achievement between field dependent cognitive style students or field independent cognitive style students; (3) at each cognitive styles, which was better learning achievement among RME approach, open ended approach or mechanistic approach, and (4) at each learning approach, which had better learning achievement between field dependent cognitive style students or field independent cognitive style students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 3×2 factorial design. The population was all students in seventh grade of state Junior High School in Pacitan Regency on Academic Years 2012/2013. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 238 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded that: (1) RME approach produce better learning achievement than open ended approach and mechanistic approach, open ended approach produce better learning achievement than mechanistic approach; (2) the field independent cognitive style students have a better learning achievement than field dependent cognitive style students; (3) at each of cognitive styles, RME approach produce better learning achievement than open ended approach and mechanistic approach, open ended approach produce better learning achievement than mechanistic approach; (4) at each learning approach, field independent cognitive style students have better learning achievement than field dependent cognitive style students.Keywords: Field Dependent, Field Independent, Mechanistic, Open Ended, Realistic Mathematics Education (RME).
Co-Authors dias Prasetyo Hema Malini Imam Sujadi Maratu Shalikhah Nuria Mahdra Fajarini Nurni Utami Riyadi Riyadi Septanto, Djoko Sumantri Widya Praja