Articles
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Surat Keterangan Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Faridhi, Adrian]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Medan Area ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (659.039 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v5i2.2181
<![CDATA[Pemilihan umum (pemilu) merupakan pesta demokrasi yang diselenggarakan sekali dalam lima tahun termasuk juga dalam hal ini pemilihan kepala daerah (Pilkada), memilih merupakan hak asasi yang mesti dilindungi sebagai hak dasar warga negara. Syarat untuk memilih dalam perkembangannya mengalami perluasan makna demi dapat menggunakan hak politik berupa memilih dan dipilih, pada awalnya syarat memilih menunjukkan surat undangan memilih, dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi cukup menunjukkan identitas berupa Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP), timbul permasalahan ketika proses penerbitan KTP bermasalah, namun penggunaan KTP sebagai dasar identitas untuk memilih, maka terbitlah ketentuan penggunaan Surat Keterangan sebagai pengganti KTP yang belum selesai. Metode penelitian ini mengunakan penelitian yuridis sosiologis yang berlokasi di Kota Pekanbaru. Hasil Penelitian yaitu penggunaan surat keterangan sebagai pengganti KTP didapatkan jumlah yang cukup besar saat Pilkada Kota Pekanbaru tahun 2017 dan surat keterangan yang digunakan sebagai pengganti KTP diberikan tidak melampirkan foto sebagaimana yang terdapat didalam KTP yang berpotensi menimbulkan kecurangan dalam pelaksanaan Pilkada.]]>
<![CDATA[Sengketa Pencalonan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Faridhi, Adrian]]>
<![CDATA[ Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, JANUARY 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The election of the Regional Head of Pekanbaru in 2017 generally went smoothly, but at the beginning of the implementation of the Pilkada stage there was a nomination dispute between the regional head candidates who did not qualify with the Pekanbaru City General Election Commission (KPU). The nomination failure was the basis of the dispute over the nomination of the regional head, because there was a reason for disability in one of the prospective candidates which resulted in the failure of the candidate to become the regional head candidate for the Pekanbaru City Election in 2017. This research is sociological juridical legal research, in the form of how to deal with applicable laws and regulations are then associated with the reality that occurs in the community. The results of this study were in the form that Pekanbaru City KPU was asked to include the H. Dastrayani Bibra- H. Said Usman Abdullah as a participant in 2017 Mayor and Deputy Mayor Election, the interpretation of disability carried out by the KPU was refuted by the decision on nominating disputes issued by Pekanbaru City Election Supervisory Committee (Panwas). The conclusion in this study is in the dispute over the nomination of the Pekanbaru regional head that the Pekanbaru City Election Commission Decision was canceled with a Decision from the Election Supervisory Agency.]]>
<![CDATA[Limited Amendment Of 1945 Basic Constitution and The Return Of Main State Guidelines ]]>
<![CDATA[Sudi Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>
<![CDATA[ MIMBAR (Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan) Volume 36, No. 1, Year 2020 [Accredited Sinta 2] No 10/E/KPT/2019] ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Bandung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (346.898 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29313/mimbar.v36i1.5322
<![CDATA[This study focuses on the consequence of discourse for bringing back the Main State Guidelines (GBHN) in the administration structure of Indonesian Republic. The GBHN has been considered a solution for the insustainability of Indonesian development, despite the fact that there have been the constitutions of National Development Planning System (SPPN), Long-Term Development Plan (RPJP), Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJM), and Annual Development Plan. The research method used is the study of normative law. The results obtained from the study are to bring back the GBHN, to require the amendment of Basic Constitution of 1945, to harmonize the statutory regulations such as the material test and juridical review of People’s Consultative Assembly’s decree regulating the GBHN, adjustment to the president’s liability in implementing the GBHN, and evaluation towards the National Development Planning System (SPPN) which so far have been implemented to produce the efficient development planning. This paper concludes that the GBHN presence will lead to the legal consequences of state administration and the rearrangement of the state administration itself. ]]>
<![CDATA[PELANGGARAN ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILU KABUPATEN ROKAN HULU TAHUN 2015-2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Respublica Vol. 16 No. 1 (2016): Hukum Bisnis, Hukum Tata Negara, dan Hukum Pidana ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Universitas Lancang Kuning ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (144.325 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31849/respublica.v16i1.1433
<![CDATA[Posisi yang strategis sebagai penyelenggara Pemilu memiliki potensi penyimpangan tingkah laku, seperti pernah terjadi di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu pada tahun 2015-2016. Terkait dengan isu pelanggaran tersebut maka permasalahan dalam artikel ini ada 2 (dua): Pertama, bagaimana implementasi Peraturan Bersama KPU, BAWASLU dan DKPP di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Tahun 2015-2016? Kedua, bagaimana penyelesaian pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Tahun 2015-2016? Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum sosiologis, yakni dengan lebih memfokuskan terhadap persoalan-persoalan yang muncul. Untuk itu, penulis menitikberatkan pembahasan pada ketentuan perundang-undangan dan melihat bagaimana hukum dipraktikkan dalam masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa implementasi Peraturan Bersama KPU, BAWASLU dan DKPP di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu tahun 2015-2016 telah diterapkan pada kasus konkrit berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 111/DKPP-PKE-V/2016 DKPP Pemilu Republik Indonesia yang sebelumnya menerima Pengaduan Nomor 155/V-P/LDKPP/2015, dan diregistrasi pada tanggal 21 Juni 2016 yang disiarkan secara teleconference Kantor BAWASLU Provinsi Riau. Penyelesaian pelanggaran kode etik penyelenggara Pemilu di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu tahun 2015-2016 yang melibatkan Anggota Komisioner KPU Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Provinsi Riau merupakan kasus pelanggaran etik kategori berat. Putusan DKPP hanya menyangkut pelanggaran etik sehingga sanksi yang diberikan berupa sanksi etik (untuk pelanggaran berat sanksinya berupa pemberhentian sebagai penyelenggara Pemilu).]]>
<![CDATA[The Violation of Campaign Props Installation in 2019 Election in Pekanbaru ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>
<![CDATA[ JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): JOELS : Journal of Election and Leadership ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31849/joels.v1i1.3537
<![CDATA[The holding of the 2019 Election is a historic event for the Indonesian Nation, because it is the first election that combines the Election of President and Vice President with the Legislative Election. Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections regulates the Campaign mechanism, one of which relates to the use of Campaign Props, yet the regulation in its implementation still violates the use of campaign props. With the interest of investigating this problem, this study used the research methodology in the form of sociological juridical research on primary data collected from field research. The results of this study showed the campaign props that violate the provisions of the legislation derived from installation, and some props are still installed even though the campaign period has finished. The solution of this research is advocating the need for close supervision of the installation of campaign props and outreach for election participants and the winning team not to violate the provisions of the election law.]]>
<![CDATA[Problems of Voting Rights in Elections in Siak Regency, Riau Province ]]>
<![CDATA[Sahat Matua]]>;
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudi Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Alexander Yandra]]>
<![CDATA[ JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): JOELS : Journal of Election and Leadership ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31849/joels.v1i2.4588
<![CDATA[Elections are a means of democracy used to rotate governmental circles, both executive and legislative powers. Voter participation in the holding of elections in 2019 is very high compared to the previous elections and therefore the potential for voters who cannot use their voting rights is very high as well. The research method used is sociological juridical research methods, with data collection techniques from primary data sources, data collection techniques by interviewing, observing, and studying literature. Problems in the form of the exercise of voting rights in Siak Regency in the General Election, that every voter can use their voting rights at the polling station, but in the implementation of simultaneous elections in 2019 in Siak District there are still Voters who cannot give their voting rights due to the endless availability of ballots, this is due to lack of effective in carrying out the data collection of potential voters conducted by election organizers when updating data, systems and infrastructure and the readiness of organizers to face simultaneous elections, low public awareness of their own voting rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Model Pelanggaran dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Pelalawan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020 ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>;
<![CDATA[Alexsander Yandra]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudi Fahmi]]>
<![CDATA[ JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): JOELS : Journal of Election and Leadership ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31849/joels.v3i1.8396
<![CDATA[Election violations in the Pelalawan Regency Head Election will be used as evaluation material in the implementation of the next general election, the findings of violations provide a model/form for improvement. This study uses a normative legal research method that uses a statutory approach. The findings of this study are a model of election violations in the form of election criminal violations, election administrative violations, ethical violations and other legal violations, this is based on findings and reports examined by Bawaslu and by Gakumdu.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Surat Keterangan Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Medan Area ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v5i2.2181
<![CDATA[Pemilihan umum (pemilu) merupakan pesta demokrasi yang diselenggarakan sekali dalam lima tahun termasuk juga dalam hal ini pemilihan kepala daerah (Pilkada), memilih merupakan hak asasi yang mesti dilindungi sebagai hak dasar warga negara. Syarat untuk memilih dalam perkembangannya mengalami perluasan makna demi dapat menggunakan hak politik berupa memilih dan dipilih, pada awalnya syarat memilih menunjukkan surat undangan memilih, dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi cukup menunjukkan identitas berupa Kartu Tanda Penduduk (KTP), timbul permasalahan ketika proses penerbitan KTP bermasalah, namun penggunaan KTP sebagai dasar identitas untuk memilih, maka terbitlah ketentuan penggunaan Surat Keterangan sebagai pengganti KTP yang belum selesai. Metode penelitian ini mengunakan penelitian yuridis sosiologis yang berlokasi di Kota Pekanbaru. Hasil Penelitian yaitu penggunaan surat keterangan sebagai pengganti KTP didapatkan jumlah yang cukup besar saat Pilkada Kota Pekanbaru tahun 2017 dan surat keterangan yang digunakan sebagai pengganti KTP diberikan tidak melampirkan foto sebagaimana yang terdapat didalam KTP yang berpotensi menimbulkan kecurangan dalam pelaksanaan Pilkada.]]>
<![CDATA[Prinsip-prinsip Berdemokrasi bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Tuna Grahita pada Pemilihan Umum 2019 di Provinsi Riau ]]>
<![CDATA[Hernimawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Yulianti Asyar]]>;
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>;
<![CDATA[Alexsander Yandra]]>
<![CDATA[ Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Vol 18 No 31 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan FISIP Universitas Riau ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35967/jipn.v18i31.7802
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang penerapan prinsip berdemokrasi bagi penyandang disabilitas tuna grahita dalam Pemilihan Umum (Pemilu) tahun 2019 di Provinsi Riau. Berkembangnya informasi dimedia elektronik dan sosial terkait orang gila memilih menjadi perhatian serius peneliti untuk mengkaji kategorisasi kelompok disabilitas tuna grahita yang terganggunya fungsi pikir karena kecerdasan di bawah rata rata. Data menunjukkan bahwa penyandang disabilitas tuna grahita diprovinsi Riau pada Pemilu 2019 sebanyak 911 orang namun tingkat partisipasi penyandang disabilitas hanya 411 orang atau lebih kurang 48%. Melalui pendekatan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi dan metode kualitatif analitis fenomenologi terlihat bahwa rendahnya partisipasi politik penyandang disabilitas tuna grahita dalam berdemokrasi disebabkan oleh inefektifnya pola penerapan prinsip berdemokrasi bagi penyandang disabilitas tuna grahita yang cendrung simetris, sehingga berdampak terhadap terbatasnya aksesibilitas penyandanng disabilitas dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan informasi kepemiluan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mencoba memberikan masukkan dampak simetris maupun asimetris keterlibatan penyandang disabilitas dalam Pemilu.]]>
<![CDATA[Sengketa Pencalonan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pekanbaru Tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrian Faridhi]]>
<![CDATA[ Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, JANUARI 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31869/plj.v2i2.1359
<![CDATA[The election of the Regional Head of Pekanbaru in 2017 generally went smoothly, but at the beginning of the implementation of the Pilkada stage there was a nomination dispute between the regional head candidates who did not qualify with the Pekanbaru City General Election Commission (KPU). The nomination failure was the basis of the dispute over the nomination of the regional head, because there was a reason for disability in one of the prospective candidates which resulted in the failure of the candidate to become the regional head candidate for the Pekanbaru City Election in 2017. This research is sociological juridical legal research, in the form of how to deal with applicable laws and regulations are then associated with the reality that occurs in the community. The results of this study were in the form that Pekanbaru City KPU was asked to include the H. Dastrayani Bibra- H. Said Usman Abdullah as a participant in 2017 Mayor and Deputy Mayor Election, the interpretation of disability carried out by the KPU was refuted by the decision on nominating disputes issued by Pekanbaru City Election Supervisory Committee (Panwas). The conclusion in this study is in the dispute over the nomination of the Pekanbaru regional head that the Pekanbaru City Election Commission Decision was canceled with a Decision from the Election Supervisory Agency.]]>
