Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RESPON TUTUR SISWA AUTIS TERHADAP TUTUR DIREKTIF GURU DALAM INTERAKSI PEMBELAJARAN DI KELAS Siti Robiah; Abdul Syukur Ibrahim; Ahmad Rofi'uddin
Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya Vol 44, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (81.365 KB)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe the form, function and response strategies from autistic studentson the teachers’ directive in the classroom. This study used a case study. The results showed that there are two categories of the students’ spoken responses: (1) speech production in the form of assertive, directive, commissive and expressive; and (2) the speech responses are based on the senses including auditory, visual and emotions. In addition, the function of the students’ responses is categorized into two: (i) the effect of speech production in terms of complaining, agreeing, asking, stating something, thanking, apologizing, asserting, reporting, mentioning and offering; and (ii) the students’ responses as the effect of the teachers’ directive speech acts. Furthermore, the students’ response strategies are divided into two categories, namely: (i) internal and external factors, and (ii) the delivery of the students’ responses  Permalink/DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v44i22016p111
RESPON TUTUR SISWA AUTIS TERHADAP TUTUR DIREKTIF GURU DALAM INTERAKSI PEMBELAJARAN DI KELAS Siti Robiah
AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Juli-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ajbe.v1i1.309

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the form, function, and response strategies said autistic students against the said directive of teachers in the learning interactions in the classroom. This study used a qualitative approach to this type of case studies. The results showed a form of response said students have two categories, namely a) manufacture a form of response aperitif response, covering the said directive, commissive, and expressive; and b) according to the type of subdivision of said response who observed, i.e. sensory response auditive, visual, and flavorings. The function of the response said the students were found in two categories, namely a) function of the response function includes the manufacture of complaining, approve, ask, ask for, stating something, showing, say thank you, apologize, asserting, reporting, States, and offering; and b) processing the occurrence response is caused by an action of the teachers giving rise to reactions from students. Furthermore, the response strategies said students found in two categories, namely a) formation of the response is determined by two factors, namely, internal and external; and b) submission of response said delivered directly.