p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Teras Kesehatan
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

VARIASI FAKTOR EKSPOSI PADA PEMERIKSAAN SCHEDEL PROYEKSI ANTERIOR POSTERIOR UNTUK HASIL RADIOGRAFI YANG MAKSIMAL DI RUMAH SAKIT AL ISLAM BANDUNG: Variation of Exposure Factors on Schedel Examination using Anterior Posterior Projection to Maximize Radiographs Quality at Al Islam Hospital of Bandung Oktarina Damayanti; Leny A Anggraeni; Surdiyah Asri Ningrum
JURNAL TERAS KESEHATAN Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Teras Kesehatan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Politeknik Al Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38215/jutek.v3i1.47

Abstract

The head is an examination that is often done at each hospital, especially Posterior Anterior projection. The quality of the results of a good picture of contrast, density and detail are needed so that the exposure factor will be very influential on the head examination. The study was conducted at Al Islam Hospital in Bandung using the head phantom. Variations in kV and mAs in this study were AP projections with 64 kV and 11.2 mAs, AP schemes with 72 kV and 14.2 mAs, AP heads with 80 kV and 12.6 mAs, AP heads with 88 kV and 14, 2 mAs and AP head radiographs with 96 kV and 16.0 mAs. The maximum exposure factor value on the head phantom in anteroposterior projections based on the data is that the respondent's value has changed and only one is the same or similar from the respondent's perspective, the use of kV 64 and mAs 11.2 has a density value of the ten respondents by 94%, the value of in contrast to the ten respondents by 68%, the sharpness value of the ten respondents by 74%, and the detailed value of the ten respondents by 74%. In the use of kV 72 and mAs 14.2, the density value of the ten respondents was 42%, the contrast value of the ten respondents was 44%, the sharpness value of the ten respondents was 38%, and the retail value of the ten respondents was 38%. The use of kV 80 and mAs 12.6 has a density value of the ten respondents of 56%, the contrast value of the ten respondents by 44%, the sharpness value of the ten respondents by 40%, and the retail value of the ten respondents by 40%. In the use of kV 88 and mAs 14.2, the density value of the ten respondents was 78%, the contrast value of the ten respondents was 64%, the sharpness value of the ten respondents was 64%, and the retail value of the ten respondents was 64%. In the use of kV 96 and mAs 16.0, the density value of the ten respondents was 78%, the contrast value of the ten respondents was 76%, the sharpness value of the ten respondents was 64%, and the retail value of the ten respondents was 80%. According to the evaluation of the ten respondents expose at Al Islam Hospital Bandung, the results of the first radiograph with the exposure factor kV 64 and mAs 11.2 had the highest value. And the lowest index value of each respondent is the exposure factor kV 72 and mAs 14.2.
Komparasi Treatment Planning Pada Kanker Leher Rahim Menggunakan Teknik 3DCRT dan IMRT: COMPARISON OF TREATMENT PLANNING IN CERVIX CANCER USING 3DCRT AND IMRT TECHNIQUES suwandi; Oktarina Damayanti; Surdiyah Asri Ningrum
JURNAL TERAS KESEHATAN Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Teras Kesehatan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Politeknik Al Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38215/jtkes.v6i1.104

Abstract

Cancer is a non-communicable disease that is still a health problem in the world, including Indonesia. About 50 percent of cancer treatments worldwide are performed using radiotherapy. In its implementation, radiotherapy includes several stages, one of which is treatment planning. This study aims to assess the difference in dose received by PTV and OARs in planning using IMRT and 3DCRT techniques in cervical cancer patients. The method used in this study is scanning using a CT simulator, delineating PTV and healthy organs around the tumor (OARs), and planning using treatment planning system software. The results showed that in OARs, 3DCRT planning resulted in a dose of 4000 cGy by hitting 58.28% of the buli volume, and a dose of 5000cGy by hitting 17.76% of the rectum volume. While planning IMRT, a dose of 4000cGy hits 31.50% of the buli volume, and a dose of 5000cGy hits 12.29% of the rectum volume. In PTV, the doses produced by 3DCRT and IMRT planning were 4750cGy and 4750 cGy, and hit 95.18% and 98.71% of PTV volume, respectively. This study concludes that planning using IMRT is better than planning using 3DCRT in cases of cervical cancer. This is shown by the dose that covers the target tumor (PTV) and a significant dose reduction in OARs.