p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL AKUNTANSI
Rizka Indri Arfianti
Bisnis dan Informatika kwik Kian Gie

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL AKUNTANSI

MODERASI FREE CASH FLOW TERHADAP FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI EARNINGS RESPONSE COEFFICIENT Filbert Nathaniel; Rizka Indri Arfianti
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 8 No 2 (2019): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46806/ja.v8i2.617

Abstract

Financial statements are the information used by investors and stakeholders for consideration of decision making. One of the important information is earnings. Quality earnings information can be relied on by users to predict the company's performance in the future. Earnings response coefficient (ERC) is a variable that measures the level of market reaction to the publication of earnings. Increasingly high market reaction means the earnings are qualified. But many other pieces of information that affect ERC, the increase in earnings is not always followed by an increase in market reaction. In this research, the other pieces of information are leverage, earnings persistence, size, and growth with free cash flow (FCF) as a moderating size and growth. The Sample of this research is 31 LQ45 companies which are listed in the IDX period 2015-2017. Sampling techniques to be used are the Non-Probability Sampling technique with Judgement Sampling Method. The data analysis method which is used in this research is the Structural Equation Model in WarpPls 5.0. The results' inner model and overall fittest are fulfilled. The conclusion showed that the leverage, size, and growth hasn’t affected the ERC, and free cash flow is not able to strengthen influence growth on ERC. However, earnings persistence has affected positively on ERC and free cash flow can strengthen influence size on ERC.Keywords: Earnings Response Coefficient, Leverage, Earnings Persistence, Size, Growth, Free Cash Flow
KEMAMPUAN SPESIALISASI INDUSTRI AUDITOR MEMODERASI PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE DAN KUALITAS AUDIT SERTA PENGARUH RASIO KEUANGAN TERHADAP AUDIT REPORT LAG Monica Kosasih; Rizka Indri Arfianti
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Edisi Februari
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46806/ja.v9i1.660

Abstract

Financial statements must be presented soon so it will not reduce its usefulness principles. This study aims to prove the effect of audit tenure and audit quality with auditor industry specialization as a moderating variable and also the effect of financial ratios to audit report lag. Research objects used mining sector companies listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2016—2018 with an amount of 35 companies and a total of 105 observational data. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistic test, pooled data regression test, classic assumption test, multiple regression linear test, and hypothesis test using SPSS 20. The classic assumption test results show that the residual data is normally distributed, there is no symptom of heteroscedasticity, the regression model is free from multicollinearity, and there is no positive or negative autocorrelation. Based on this research, it can be concluded that there is sufficient evidence that solvability ratio has a positive effect on audit report lag, audit quality, and profitability ratio have negative effects on audit report lag. However, there is no sufficient evidence that audit tenure has a negative effect on audit report lag and auditor industry specialization doesn’t have the capability to moderate the effect of audit tenure and audit quality to audit report lag. Keywords: audit report lag, audit tenure, audit quality, financial ratios, auditor industry specialization
PENGARUH LEVEL DIVERSIFIKASI, JUMLAH SEGMEN, DAN JENIS SEKTOR INDUSTRI TERHADAP KINERJA PERUSAHAAN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2016 – 2018 Felicia; Rizka Indri Arfianti
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46806/ja.v9i2.762

Abstract

The high competition in the business world with many competitors has forced the company to develop its business, one of them by diversification. This study aims to investigate the influence of diversification level, segment numbers, and industrial sector types on firm performance measured by the excess value. The theory underlying this research is agency theory, which describes the relationship between the company owner with the company management, The number of samples of this study are 333 companies from miscellaneous industry sector, and consumer goods sector, and basic industry and chemicals sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange throughout 2017 – 2018. The results showed that data can be pooled for 3 years, all classic assumption tests are fulfilled, and partial regression coefficient test found that variable diversification level and variable number of segments > 0.05, then Ho1 and Ho2 rejected, while type of miscellaneous industry sector and Type of consumer goods sector <0.05, then Ho3 and Ho4 received. The conclusion showed that variable diversification level and variable number of segments has not sufficient evidence of negative effect on excess value, while type of miscellaneous industry sector and Type of consumer goods sector sufficient evidence of negative effect on excess value. Keywords: Firm Performance, Diversification Level, Number of Segments, and Industrial Sector. References: Amyulianthy, R., & Nuraini, Sari. (2013), “Pengaruh Diversifikasi Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan”, Binus Business Review, Vol.4, no.1, pp.215–230. Berger, P. G., & Eli, O. (1995), “Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.37, pp.39–65. Bowerman, B. L., O’Connell, R. T., & Murphree, E. S. (1979), Business Statistics in Practice, Edisi 7, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Chandra, D., & Triyani, Y. (2015), “Pengaruh Level Diversifikasi, Leverage, Return On Asset, Umur Perusahaan, Dan Sektor Industri Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Periode 2009-2011”, Jurnal Akuntansi Manajemen, Vol.4, no.2, pp.66–84. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2013), Business Research Methods, Edisi 12, New York: McGraw-Hill. 'Diversifikasi Usaha, Unilever Masuk Bisnis Saus Sambal' (2018), CNBC Indonesia, 28 September, diakses 9 Oktober 2019, https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20180928100757-17-35152/diversifikasi-usaha-unilever-masuk-bisnis-saus-sambal Ghozali, I. (2013), Aplikasi Analisis Multivariette Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23, Edisi 8, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Gujarati, D., & Dawn, P. (2009), Basic Econometrics, Edisi 4, New York: McGraw-Hill. Harto, P. (2005), “Kebijakan Diversifikasi Perusahaan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia”, SNA VIII Solo, pp.297-307. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (2014), Standar Akuntansi Keuangan, Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Jensen, M. C., & William, H. M. (1976), "Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economic, Vol.3, No.4, pp.1-75. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. 2014. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online”, diakses 5 Oktober 2019 http://www.kbbi.web.id. Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2016), Intermediate Accounting, Edisi 16, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Lucyanda, J., & Wardhani, R. H. K. (2017), “Pengaruh Diversifikasi Dan Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Montgomery, Cynthia A. (1994), Corporate Diversification, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.8, No.3, pp.163-178. Rani, P. (2015). “Peran Kepemilikan Manajerial Dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Strategi Diversifikasi Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol.4, no.2, pp.162–82. Salindeho, A. O., Ivonne, S. S., & Joubert, B. M. (2018), “Pengaruh Diversifikasi Usaha Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dan Return Saham Study Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Automotive and Effect of Business Diversification of Financial Performance and Return Stock Case Stock in Automotive and Component Manufacturing”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol.6, no.3, pp.1078–87. Sari, I. A., Wiratno, A., & Suyono, E. (2014), “Pengaruh Strategi Diversifikasi Dan Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan”, JAFFA (Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting), Vol.02, no.1, pp.13–22. Scott, W. R. (2015), Financial Accounting Theory, Edisi 7, Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc. Setionoputri, A., Meiden, C., & Siagian, D. (2007), “Pengaruh Diversifikasi Korporat Terhadap Excess Value Perusahaan Manufaktur, Perdagangan Grosir Dan Eceran, Serta Properti Dan Real Estate Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2005-2007” Bidang Akuntansi Private: Akuntansi Keuangan dan Pasar Modal, pp.1–25. Satoto, S. S. (2009), “Strategi Diversifikasi Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan”, Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, Vol.13, no.2, pp.280–287. Spence, M. (2002), “Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets”, American Economic Review, Vol.92, no.3, pp.434–459. Thompson, A. J. G., & Peteraf, M. (2012), Crafting and Executing Strategy: Concept and Cases, Edisi 18, New York: McGraw Hill. Virginia, Y. M., & Ratnasih, C. (2017), “Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Dan Berimplikasi Pada Kinerja Karyawan”, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol.53, no.9, pp.1689–99. Wolk, H. I., Dodd, J. L., & Tearney, M. G. (2003), Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues in a Political and Economic Environment, Edisi 6, Mason: South-Western College Pub.
FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KETEPATAN WAKTU PENYAMPAIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN Leny Septiani; Rizka Indri Arfianti
Jurnal Akuntansi Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46806/ja.v11i2.879

Abstract

Timeliness of the submission of financial statements is the most important thing because the information contained in it is needed by the parties, especially investors. Timeliness of the submission of financial statements is necessary so as not to lose its relevance. Loss of relevance can make information less useful for decision making. However, in reality there are still public companies that are late in submitting their financial reports, one of which is the property and real estate sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of profitability, leverage, firm size and audit committee meeting frequencies on the timeliness of submitting financial statements. Financial Services Authority (OJK) Regulation No. 29 /POJK.04/2016 Article 7 states that the submission of the annual financial report to OJK is no later than the end of the fourth month (120 days) after the date of the annual financial report, and if it exceeds 120 days, it will be subject to sanctions, fines by PT Bursa Efe Indonesia. The object of research used is the property and real estate sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2020. The results of the research using Wald's test show that the independent variables are profitability, solvency size of the company, and the number of audit committee meetings with a value of sig. one tail each of 0.095, 0.028, 0.021, 0.311 so that the first and fourth hypotheses are rejected. While the second and third variables show test results of 0.028 and 0.021 so that the second and third hypotheses are accepted. The conclusion of this study shows that solvency has a negative effect and firm size has a positive effect on the timeliness of submitting financial statements. Meanwhile, profitability and audit committee meetings have no effect on the timeliness of submitting financial reports.