Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pembuatan Meja Bak Cuci Tangan Menggunakan Mutu Beton Sederhana dengan Memanfaatkan Limbah Olahan Rotan dan Sosialisasi Cuci Tangan 6 Langkah di Panti Asuhan Budi Mulya Kota Palangka Raya Rida Respati; Nirwana Puspasari; Hendra Putra Jaya; Ridho Saleh Silaban; Ari Widya Permana
PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 6 No 2 (2021): PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/pengabdianmu.v6i2.1872

Abstract

The development of coronavirus or Covid-19 in Central Kalimantan is currently increasingly worrying. All areas in this province are now in red zone status. This transmission is very fast spreading, so we are doing outreach to the community at Budi Mulya Orphanage, Palangka Raya City, implementing 6 recommended handwashing steps to kill the Covid 19 virus that sticks to our fingers. Washing hands with soap is one of the sanitation measures to prevent disease. Even WHO also recommends 6 steps in washing the palms of hands, the palms of backs of hands, between the fingers, the backs of hands, the thumbs, and the tips of fingers. The last method of washing hands is to clean soap with running water and dry it. To support the 6-step handwashing program, we are working with the orphanage's leadership to make a table for a water storage basin used for washing hands. The table is made permanent, made of reinforced concrete, whose composition of the reinforced concrete mixture is mixed with processed rattan waste that is no longer used as a substitute for concrete fiber. The rattan waste mixture used was 0.25% of the total volume of concrete.
Permodelan Pengekangan Kolom Pada Beton Mutu Normal Dengan Metode Elemen Hingga 3-D Ridho Saleh Silaban; Darmansyah Tjitradi; Syahril Taufik
Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol 8 No 2 (2020): Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1520.271 KB) | DOI: 10.33084/mits.v8i2.1408

Abstract

The column is a critical element in the building structure, the failure of the column will directly result in the collapse of other related structural components. The column must have strength, stability and ductility. In increasing the capacity and ductility of the column by providing confinement, to protect concrete elements from breaking due to the influence of the working pressure. Analyzing ultimate axial load capability, stress-strain distribution patterns and crack patterns in concrete elements and column ductility. Tests of several models and variations of the restraint distance in short columns of normal concrete quality with longitudinal reinforcement of steel steels and carbon steel transversal reinforcement. The columns were analyzed using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method with the help of a full scale ANSYS 3-D application, with material properties for concrete using SOLID65 and steel reinforcement using LINK8 and SOLID45 loading plates. The type of pedestal used is the joints with axial loading (axial loadstep) centric direction. The effect of the restraint model and the variation of the restraint distance to the value of the column ultimate axial load for the whole model is relatively small with a ratio of 1.079, while for the ratio of the axial deformation ratio of 1.496. The pattern of stress and strain distribution when yielding spreads throughout the column area but when it reaches the ultimate distribution the concentration is concentrated in the support area. The first dominant crack occurs in the pedestal area and generally occurs in the concrete blanket layer, in the ultimate condition cracks have occurred evenly throughout the column area. The ratio of the ratio of ductility values ​​for all column models and the restraint distance is relatively large with a ratio value of 1.523
Analisa Struktur Bangunan Rumah Susun MBR Type – 36 (3 Lantai) Prototype Pada Wilayah Gempa Dan Non Gempa Study Kasus Rusun MBR Pemkab Kotim : Structure Analysis Of Flats Building Type MBR – 36 (3 Floor) Prototype In Earthquake And Non Earthquake Areas Case Study MBR Flats Of Kotim Regional Government Ridho Saleh Silaban
Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/mits.v11i1.4221

Abstract

Structural design is an important element in a building to produce a strong, safe, and economic structure. The structure is designed according to the needs of the working load. The earthquake area will produce different dimensions of the structure and reinforcement with non-earthquake. This study aims to compare the need for dimensions and reinforcement in earthquake vs non-earthquake areas. The design standard refers to SNI 1727:2013, SNI 2847:2013, SNI 2847-2019, and SNI 1726-2019. The building being studied is a Type 36 MBR Prototype Flat (3 floors) using Fc 25 MPa concrete and Fy 400 MPa reinforcing steel. Research on the upper structure of Columns, Beams, Ring balks, and Floor plates, includes the design of the structural dimensions and reinforcement requirements. The structure's dimensions and the reinforcement area will be designed efficiently and declared safe by controlling the reinforcement ratio (ρ), Limitation of structural dimensions, Capacity Ratio (Pu/ϕ.Pn), and deflection. Analysis of the calculation of the structure using the computer application SAP 2000. The results of the study obtained a comparison of the structural dimensions of the earthquake vs non-earthquake load column with an average of 25.42%, while for the need for the main reinforcement area of 22.50%, the Capacity Ratio value (Pu/ϕ.Pn) between 0.535-0.967. The dimensions of the beam and floor slab structures with an average of 23.84%, while the area of flexural reinforcement (AS) is 20.22%, with a maximum deflection (δ) for all beams and floor slabs with values between 0.13 - 3.70 mm. Comparison for the entire structure the dimensions with an average of 24.63% while the reinforcement is 21.36%.